Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
The comment on the change is:
deleted fixed issue
---
Hi,
diving into the open issues, I would like prio them.
* SANDBOX-282 TAR formaT unspecified
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-282
I would do this in version 1.1. Its an important thing, but will need
its time, at least, if I work on this :-)
* SANDBOX-286 BZip2CompressorInputStream
Hi,
a patch for SANDBOX-298 is available. Nothing special here.
Thanks for applying!
Cheers
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by ChristianGrobmeier:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CompressRoadmap
--
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Stephen Colebourne
wrote:
>
> Thats OK technically (as there is no runtime dependency on
> net.jcip.annotations). However, I suspect it will confuse users, as very few
> people realise that no dependency is created beyond compilation time.
>
I agree. Most folks
I added a patch for CPIO to SANDBOX-294
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2009-03-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>
>> > I'd like to remove some fields, make them private or final and maybe
>> > move some methods around before our fir
I think the use of JCIP annotations should be an Apache Commons-wide
decision. It would only be sensible to share the annotations across
projects. Otherwise, we could get fragmentation pretty easily.
Paul
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19/03/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>
On 19/03/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > > Are you proposing including these pieces of annotation code in [lang],
> or
> > > just referencing them? If its just referencing them, then it has no real
> > > effect, and should be fine (aprt from making the compilation a little
sebb wrote:
Are you proposing including these pieces of annotation code in [lang], or
just referencing them? If its just referencing them, then it has no real
effect, and should be fine (aprt from making the compilation a little more
complex)
I'm not sure what you mean by "including" or "refe
On 19/03/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > > I think that there is the distinct possibility of other groups
> including
> > > these annotatons. Maybe even JDK7. Should [lang] include them. Or use
> > > slightly different names?
> > >
> >
> > Not sure I follow.
> >
> > These
sebb wrote:
I think that there is the distinct possibility of other groups including
these annotatons. Maybe even JDK7. Should [lang] include them. Or use
slightly different names?
Not sure I follow.
These are existing annotations, from http://jcip.net/:
http://jcip.net/annotations/doc/index
Hi Ted,
As you suggested I opened a ticket for this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-250
:)
- Bernhard
Ted Dunning schrieb:
> Reasoning purely by symmetry, doesn't it seem that where you are headed here
> is toward an extended rational polynomial class that handles rational
>
On 18/03/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > I've added JCIP annotations jar to the POM, but not started adding any
> > actual annotations yet.
> >
> > The idea would be to annotate every class as one of
> >
> > @Immutable
> > @ThreadSafe
> > @NotThreadSafe
> >
> > These annotation
sebb wrote:
I've added JCIP annotations jar to the POM, but not started adding any
actual annotations yet.
The idea would be to annotate every class as one of
@Immutable
@ThreadSafe
@NotThreadSafe
These annotation appear in the Javadoc output in the class description.
Also, for objects that n
Yep. 72 hours after the vote is called; so tonight.
I'll be on a 777 over Greenland then, so it'll be Thurs night GMT
before the release happens. :)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Russel Winder
wrote:
> Henri,
>
> It seems there are only +1s for Commons CLI 1.2 RC7 which implies that
> of tho
Googling led me to the httpclient thread you started. If there is no runtime
dependency I am fine with it. :)
-Matt
--- On Wed, 3/18/09, sebb wrote:
> From: sebb
> Subject: [LANG] 3.0 JCIP Annotations
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2009, 10:51 AM
> I've added
I've added JCIP annotations jar to the POM, but not started adding any
actual annotations yet.
The idea would be to annotate every class as one of
@Immutable
@ThreadSafe
@NotThreadSafe
These annotation appear in the Javadoc output in the class description.
Also, for objects that need synchroniz
> Yes, understood now, thanks.
>
> In which case maybe it is worth refactoring into two package-protected
> methods so Unit tests can exercise them easily. It would be useful for
> a Windows developer to be able to test the Unix code too.
>
> Also consider doing this for any other bits of code that
On 18/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Sorry, I still don't understand why refactoring would be needed in
> > order for the code to be tested using CI?
> >
> > I must be missing something - can you explain?
> > I'm curious to know what the problem is that requires refactoring for CI.
>
> Sorry, I still don't understand why refactoring would be needed in
> order for the code to be tested using CI?
>
> I must be missing something - can you explain?
> I'm curious to know what the problem is that requires refactoring for CI.
Sorry for beeing unclear. Refactoring is big term for "ext
On 18/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> So we don't have a continues
> >> integration test for exactly that problem.
> >
> > IMO it does not matter not having a continuous integration test so
> > long as the OS-specific stuff is tested from time to time by someone,
> > and pa
Hi,
>> So we don't have a continues
>> integration test for exactly that problem.
>
> IMO it does not matter not having a continuous integration test so
> long as the OS-specific stuff is tested from time to time by someone,
> and particularly before release.
>
> Might be a good idea to make a no
On 18/03/2009, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> > At present the doap files are in each project trunk, and therefore
> > presumably get copied to tags (and branches), where they don't really
> > make sense.
>
>
> They don't?
They are mainly inte
On 18/03/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> test works on OSX - but we cannot really test on *nix boxes if the
> name-normalizing works on windows too. "if system == windows" wouldn't
> give back "windows" at the gump servers. So we don't have a continues
> integration test for exactly
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
On 18/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > I'd like to remove some fields, make them private or final and maybe
> > move some methods around before our first release. In particular:
>
>
> I just saw sebb's patch attached to SANDBOX-294 and he seems to agr
Hi,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:54 AM, sebb wrote:
> At present the doap files are in each project trunk, and therefore
> presumably get copied to tags (and branches), where they don't really
> make sense.
They don't?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Henri,
It seems there are only +1s for Commons CLI 1.2 RC7 which implies that
of those who showed a preference 100% voted yes. Sounds like the jar
can hit the Maven repository :-) Unless I am missing something about
the Apache process (which is likely as I haven't read the appropriate
webpages).
29 matches
Mail list logo
