On 2009-03-16, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Personally I think failing is good and we'll learn lots from it. I'd
> like to keep trunk until the consumer community indicate it's a pain
> point.
Right now it doesn't look as if any of the projects with many
dependees was affected. So the changes right n
On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support
in VFS
trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in VFS
> > > trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons Configuration
>
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in
VFS
trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons
Configuration
(that code is also complete) but to do so I need a release of VFS
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Siegfried:
>
> If you've gone through the pains of running builds through your JDK 'zoo',
> you might want to list what you've tested here for the record.
- Blackdown JDK 1.4.2.03 [blackdown-jdk-1.4.2]
- IBM JDK 1.4.2.12 [ibm-jdk-bin-1.4]
- IBM JDK 1.5.0.9 [ibm-jdk-bin-1.5]
Siegfried:
If you've gone through the pains of running builds through your JDK 'zoo', you
might want to list what you've tested here for the record.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 3:56 PM
> To:
+1, tests succeed on my compiler zoo.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> here is the next release candidate for commons-exec-1.0
>
> +) the findbugs configuration file is now part of the source
> distribution so the site can be rebuild based on the source distribution
> alone
> +) using v
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in VFS
> trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons Configuration
> (that code is also complete) but to do so I need a release of VFS 2.0.
> What must be done to accomplish this? FWIW I do
It's not necessary to get the key signed by others before using it to
sign a release.
Just create a key and add it to KEYS and upload it to a key server.
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I'd be happy to do all that. But my understanding is that I can't do the
> release until all those steps a
[X] +1 release it
:-)
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> here is the next release candidate for commons-exec-1.0
>
> +) the findbugs configuration file is now part of the source
> distribution so the site can be rebuild based on the source distribution
> alone
> +) using version number "1.0
+1, finally ;-)
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Fixing the unit test failure that Jörg found.
>
> ---
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC7
>
> Site remains unchanged:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1
>
> Binaries:
>
>
http://people.apache
+1
Oliver
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Fixing the unit test failure that Jörg found.
---
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC7
Site remains unchanged:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/cli/1.2/RC7/
I'd be happy to do all that. But my understanding is that I can't do
the release until all those steps are completed. I'd really like VFS
2.0 released asap. Since I'm also not on the PMC I can't even vote for
the release. As far as I can tell I'm the only one committing code
but I know I'm
Lots of checkstyle warnings, but these don't seem to be blockers.
+1
Luc
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
> +1
>
> Tested on Mac OS 10.4.1 using JDK 1.4.2 and 1.5.0
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Fixing the unit test failure that Jörg found.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Tag:
>>
+1
Oliver
Siegfried Goeschl schrieb:
Hi folks,
here is the next release candidate for commons-exec-1.0
+) the findbugs configuration file is now part of the source
distribution so the site can be rebuild based on the source distribution
alone
+) using version number "1.0" instead of "1.0.0"
+
Unless something has changed, the current test cases do include hsqldb based
tests.
The specific issue is that some of the changes in the proposed 1.2 have a
specific impact on specific databases ( notably, oracle ) -- so it would be
extremely useful if someone who has some access to some oracle i
+1
Tested on Mac OS 10.4.1 using JDK 1.4.2 and 1.5.0
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Fixing the unit test failure that Jörg found.
>
> ---
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC7
>
> Site remains unchanged:
>
> http://people.apache.org/
+1
Builds and tests pass (mvn clean site) on Windows XP SP3 for the following:
Sun Java 1.6.0_12
Sun Java 1.5.0_13
Sun Java 1.4.2_19
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:36 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subjec
Why can't our test suite include some hsqldb-based tests? We do that at
work to test our hibernate queries and stuff. Each test case class gets
their own in-memory database. Performance isn't an issue
On Mar 15, 2009 3:10 PM, "Dan Fabulich" wrote:
My third attempt at releasing a commons proj
Hi Ralph,
+) see http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
+) you can upload your key to a public key server even if it is not
trusted yet
+) afterwards you add it to the KEYS file and commit it
+) you have to join a key signing party at some point in time
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Ralp
On 16/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> >
> > > The problem gets even more complicated if we tried to write a generic
> > > "IntegrationTestApp" to work against multiple vendors. How would the
> > > IntegrationTestApp know what column types
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>> On 2009-03-16, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> I've not looked into this yet, but I think we can have two Lang builds
>>> in Gump, one for the new stuff, and another for other projects.
>>
>> Easily, yes.
>>
>> Is there a bran
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-16, sebb wrote:
>
>> I've not looked into this yet, but I think we can have two Lang builds
>> in Gump, one for the new stuff, and another for other projects.
>
> Easily, yes.
>
> Is there a branch that should be used by project
sebb wrote:
On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
The problem gets even more complicated if we tried to write a generic
"IntegrationTestApp" to work against multiple vendors. How would the
IntegrationTestApp know what column types are possible? How would it manage
access to the DataSource in a
Hi Stefan,
good idea - cu on Wednesday ...
Siegfried Goeschl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-13, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>
>
>> if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or
>> two favours already for maven-related help
>>
>
> I won't be there for the hack
On 15/03/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> here is the next release candidate for commons-exec-1.0
>
> +) the findbugs configuration file is now part of the source
> distribution so the site can be rebuild based on the source distribution
> alone
> +) using version number "1.0" i
On 2009-03-13, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or
> two favours already for maven-related help
I won't be there for the hackathon but arrive Wednesday. If you stay
around during the conference and could spare half an hour to bring
On 2009-03-16, sebb wrote:
> I've not looked into this yet, but I think we can have two Lang builds
> in Gump, one for the new stuff, and another for other projects.
Easily, yes.
Is there a branch that should be used by project that are likely to be
broken by the changes in lang?
Stefan
-
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon
I'd be happy to help with any compress-related stuff on Tuesday during
the Hackathon.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> The compress component shall become a proper Commons component:
[x] +1 Yes
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additi
The changes to Lang in trunk are likely to break lots of Gump builds.
Since the changes are a work in progress, and we are not trying
specifically to maintain backwards API compatibility, it seems
unhelpful to cause other projects Gump grief just yet, as they will
miss out on detecting other chang
+1
Luc
- "Siegfried Goeschl" a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> here is the next release candidate for commons-exec-1.0
>
> +) the findbugs configuration file is now part of the source
> distribution so the site can be rebuild based on the source
> distribution
> alone
> +) using version number "1
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Fixing the unit test failure that Jörg found.
---
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC7
Site remains unchanged:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/cli/1.2/RC7/staged/commons-cli/commons-cli/1.2/
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Hen,
>>
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
Therefore we may either ensure that a call to create will always reset
the builder in ca
35 matches
Mail list logo
