On 2009-03-16, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally I think failing is good and we'll learn lots from it. I'd > like to keep trunk until the consumer community indicate it's a pain > point.
Right now it doesn't look as if any of the projects with many dependees was affected. So the changes right now don't seem to hurt to many unrelated projects. If a project isn't willing to adapt to the commons-lang changes, I'll add a project for the 2.4 tag and make this project depend on it, OK? > For example making a lang-backcompat jar for enum and exceptions > might be a better choice and getting projects to add a dependency on > that in gump. This works great for Ant built projects but doesn't work at all for Maven built ones since those additional jars would never be used by Maven unless they are listed in the POM. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
