I've noticed that HierarchicalConfiguration isn't part of the
inheritance for the various hierarchical implementations. This seems
rather odd. What base class are applications migrating to configuration2
supposed to convert all their references to? In fact, I'm wondering if
HierarchicalConfigu
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Proving Phil's point on release process, I'm staring at Collections
>> and wondering just how to release it.
>>
>
>
> :-)
>
> Don't know what pr
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proving Phil's point on release process, I'm staring at Collections
> and wondering just how to release it.
>
:-)
Don't know what process you used before. I followed the process on top
of this page for the previous Commo
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're converging John here,
>
> I'll try to keep up with patches and commits in order for you to become a
> committer.
> Henri, can you please agree that we "try to make jelly enter a maintained
> mode", within a month or
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Russel Winder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:27 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
>> threa
On 11/11/2008, John Spackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Great :)
>
> I'm working on some addition patches for JELLY-184 and a few others; they
> don't always make a lot of sense added to a single JIRA entry though, IE
> patch for one bug affecting the patch script for another - is
Hi Henri,
Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to "put it in the
window
and see if we're invited to play" [...snip...]
As below - analogy was about other Apache projects but probably
applies here as you say.
Hi Paul,
Great :)
I'm working on some addition patches for JELLY-184 and a few others; they
don't always make a lot of sense added to a single JIRA entry though, IE
patch for one bug affecting the patch script for another - is it OK to just
email an update here instead?
John
- Original
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
We're converging John here,
I'll try to keep up with patches and commits in order for you to
become a committer.
Henri, can you please agree that we "try to make jelly enter a
maintained mode", within a month or so, before we show "not actively
maintained" on the web-page?
thanks in advan
John,
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 05:28 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I think you're talking about a different "problem" - Jelly is used for far
> more than Ant/Maven replacement (I don't usually use either) and maintaining
> it is not an altruistic choice for me, but a practical one because
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:27 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
> thread, marked [OT].
Possibly but I didn't think of it. On other lists that would ha
Hi,
Does anybody know if CSV is still active? I'm looking for some feedback
about the CSV status and a roadmap. I'd like to offer my help in order
to support getting an official (non-alpha, non-beta, non-nightly)
release out of the door. I submitted SANDBOX-268 to discuss the issue.
-Gunnar
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
