John, On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 05:28 +0000, John Spackman wrote: [ . . . ] > I think you're talking about a different "problem" - Jelly is used for far > more than Ant/Maven replacement (I don't usually use either) and maintaining > it is not an altruistic choice for me, but a practical one because I find it > so very useful.
Well that implies continued existence which implies Apache should not retire it but allow those people who are prepared to maintain it some mechanism to maintain and release. But then I am pretty much an outsider here. -- Russel. ==================================================== Dr Russel Winder Partner Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203 41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084 London SW11 1EN, UK. m: +44 7770 465 077
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
