On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:19:22 +0200, simon wrote:
> The second part of the "jar hell" problem is dependencies which *are*
> exported as part of a bundle's public API.
>
> For example, a bundle exports a class with this API:
> public boolean isInRange(
> org.apache.lang.math.DoubleRange range
Artifacts look good to me and I tested on JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6
so +1 from me
Niall
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
> two release candidates, and especially to those who
> helped resolve them.
>
On 6/13/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have other components with only one active person so IMO its not a
> blocker. For me I would hope there is an intention on your part to
> stick around and support it - I'm not looking for any kind of promise,
> since none of us know
On 6/13/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the notes, my condolences on the jet lag,
:-)
> and my apologies if I sounded like I was attacking you
> personally; I certainly wasn't.
>
Bah, no, it didn't come across that way either.
-Rahul
---
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
>
> > >
> > > You need to use the "rc" profile when building
> a
> > > release candidate.
> > > The default profile shouldn't be upda
On 6/13/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sgoeschl
> Date: Fri Jun 13 05:34:14 2008
> New Revision: 667505
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667505&view=rev
> Log:
> Updating the FAQ
>
> Modified:
> commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/src/site/fml/faq.fml
>
> Modi
On 6/12/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > You need to use the "rc" profile when building a
> > release candidate.
> > The default profile shouldn't be updating the site.
> > We should have to
> > turn on a "release" profile
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
>> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
>> commons-exec to commons proper?
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 20:19 +0200, Nacho Gonzalez Mac Dowell wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> > Tom Schindl schrieb:
> >
> >> I can feel your pain. Thank god I'm using OSGi and can declare my
> >> dependencies explicitly :-)
> >>
> >
> > Yep. Well, it works for those libs that are ju
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
I would be very happy to see Exec promoted and released.
Luc
>
> The curren
Thanks for your attention, Sebastian.
--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the
> previous
> > two release candidates, and especially to those
> who
> > helped resolve them.
> >
> > The artifa
On 13/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
> two release candidates, and especially to those who
> helped resolve them.
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/
.asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 sho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Tom Schindl schrieb:
I can feel your pain. Thank god I'm using OSGi and can declare my
dependencies explicitly :-)
Yep. Well, it works for those libs that are just internal implementation
details.
I'm not an OSGi expert, but if any exported class contains a
Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous
two release candidates, and especially to those who
helped resolve them.
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC3/
Site:
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Update: Luckily pquerna was available on
> #asfinfra
> > and retrieved the production site from www before
> it
> > got synched with the new content. I couldn't get
>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
>
> The current state of the
For stuff like MapUtils and StringUtils, I'd probably place a comment
in there that these are not intended to be part of the public API and
could change without warning.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http://wiki.apache.or
My results:
Time: 49.106
OK (55 tests)
-bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS maven.zones.apache.org 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc
Thanks for all your work on this!
Cheers,
Brett
2008/6/14 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi James,
>
> that was quick ... :-)
>
> +) any Solaris version w
Well, the machine I setup was an Intel-based machine (pentium 4 I
believe), just for playing around with Solaris. This seems like a
quick way to get started playing with Solaris! :) It's got JDK1.5 on
it right now I believe. I'll try to run the tests tonight when I get
home. Or, you could use
We also have a zone (Solaris on intel) that can be used to test it.
2008/6/13 James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
> Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
> test there, assuming the test suite runs
Hi James,
that was quick ... :-)
+) any Solaris version would do
+) the standalone tests suite is here :
http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/download/commons-exec/
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
James Carman wrote:
What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
Solaris 10 on
What version of Solaris needs coverage? I just installed a copy of
Solaris 10 on a machine at home yesterday. I might be able to run the
test there, assuming the test suite runs okay.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> according to http:
Hi folks,
according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
commons-exec to commons proper?!
The current state of the commons-exec
(http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/exec/)
+) I made my first bug fix i
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly are you having trouble with? What is "not working on
> linux"? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
> If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Venkar does state that he is seeing
What exactly are you having trouble with? What is "not working on
linux"? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Also, some might consider it rude to append your message with
"solution to this. I am in urgent need" (especially
Hi,
I want to invoke a command in a remote machine using RSh(remote shell) from my
java app, so I'm trying out the examples.rshell class in commons-net-1.4.1.
The only way it succeeded was running the Java app from linux(as root) to
linux, but my app will not be run as root, and I must invoke a
26 matches
Mail list logo
