What's the recommended way of using commons-vfs 1.0 with CIFS support?
Thanks,
--
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:30 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All the issues for 2.4 are done; seems like it's release time?
>
> There are a few Findbugs errors that look easy to fix, e.g
>
> Computation of average could overflow i
The CreatingReleases wiki page was a bit hard to find (as an aside,
thanks to all who contributed to it), ISTR wikidiffs on the topic and
went back to the archives to look it up.
Couple of things I find helpful for MoinMoin navigation-related bits:
* Best to have new pages be in local site map o
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsCommitters
The comment on the change is:
Link to CreatingReleases
--
On 3/12/08, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > While this hadn't happened in recent commons-parent releases you did
> >> > (so the po
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
Add a background section about preventing lost licens
On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > For
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: niallp
>> Date: Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008
>> New Revision: 635214
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org
On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > >
> > > For components that are targetted at Java 1.4+, I'd say drop the M1
> > > build files ent
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Author: niallp
> >> Date: Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008
> >> New Revision: 635214
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?re
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: niallp
Date: Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008
New Revision: 635214
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635214&view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release commons-parent-9
Modified:
commons/proper/
On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For components that are targetted at Java 1.4+, I'd say drop the M1
> > build files entirely, as IMO they don't offer any benefit, and are
> > confusing unless
There are quite a few raw types still remaining in both the java and test trees.
Likewise @Override should be added to methods that are intended to
override a parent method.
Any objections if I work my way through these?
-
To un
On 3/10/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
> there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
> There are lots of places that could use improved unit tests.
>
> Generally though - it always feel
On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008
> New Revision: 635214
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635214&view=rev
> Log:
> [maven-release-plugin] prepare release commons-parent-9
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/common
I think I've found a solution to the leap year processing.
At present the code tries the short date and then adds the current
year if the parse fails.
This does not work on Java 1.4 or earlier because Feb 29 1970 does not
cause a parse failure - the date is converted to Mar 1 1970.
One solution s
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
On 12.03.2008, at 14:56, Matt Benson wrote:
--- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new
PMC members as
usual? :-)
Not sure whether I'm being overly formal... proposed
edits; I'll commit if given approval:
Please commit. No need to send aro
--- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new
> PMC members as
> usual? :-)
Not sure whether I'm being overly formal... proposed
edits; I'll commit if given approval:
Index: board-2008-03.txt
=
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Couple of things missing:
> >
> > - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
> > - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
> >
> > Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12.03.2008, at 13:18, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Couple of things missing:
> >
> > - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
>
> I knew it :-D
>
>
> > - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
>
> But that one is listed
Yes sor
On 12.03.2008, at 13:18, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Couple of things missing:
- Gary Gregory joined the PMC
I knew it :-D
- FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
But that one is listed
Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSG
On 12/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couple of things missing:
>
> - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
> - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
>
> Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
> one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSGi metadata - I doubt I
Couple of things missing:
- Gary Gregory joined the PMC
- FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSGi metadata - I doubt I will
do that manually again, so probably releases will only include OSGi
Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new PMC members as
usual? :-)
Henry, did I cover the Incubator idea correctly? Feel free to change
directly in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/pmc/commons/reports/board
...or let me know.
cheers
--
Apache Commons Board Report, March 20
On 12/03/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about using ftp.microsoft.com for the Windows Tests?
I think that should be run past the PMC - is it fair to use another
company's resources in this way? I know it's not likely to generate a
big load, but including another organisa
What about using ftp.microsoft.com for the Windows Tests?
They should be available quite reliably, eh? And it's very
likely that they will keep using a Windows FTP server rather
than switching to UNIX.
Y:\>ftp ftp.microsoft.com
Connected to ftp.microsoft.com.
220 Microsoft FTP Service
User (ftp.mi
Hi all,
regarding FTP parser date +-6 month problem:
Having a look at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3659.txt?number=3659 section 3
it seems that there is a standardization effort in place
to finally get time values right for FTP (proposed standard
"MDTM" command. So this is what we'll want to have i
30 matches
Mail list logo
