On 3/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008 > New Revision: 635214 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635214&view=rev > Log: > [maven-release-plugin] prepare release commons-parent-9 > > Modified: > commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?rev=635214&r1=635213&r2=635214&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml (original) > +++ commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml Sun Mar 9 03:45:50 2008 > @@ -1,22 +1,3 @@ > -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > -<!-- > - > - Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more > - contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with > - this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. > - The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 > - (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with > - the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > - > - http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > - > - Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > - distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > - WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. > - See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > - limitations under the License. > - > ---> > <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";> > <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > <parent> <snip/>
While this hadn't happened in recent commons-parent releases you did (so the pom seemed set up exactly as needed, given prior discussions), this release seems to have stripped out the license header again. I'm not sure how important it is (for a pom release) and thereby, how much effort should be spent in looking into this. Just seems a bit displeasing that it would do that just in time for the tag :-) -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
