On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Couple of things missing: > > > > - Gary Gregory joined the PMC > > - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released > > > > Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did > > one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSGi metadata - I doubt I will > > do that manually again, so probably releases will only include OSGi > > metadata if we use m2 as the primary build tool for releases. Do we > > want to make using m2 a commons-wide policy? All but two components > > (jelly and attributes) have m2 builds, so IMO it would be a good idea. > > > > However M2 requires Java 1.4+. > > Some components are intended for Java 1.3 or earlier. > For Java 1.3, one can use Maven 1.0.2 or Ant 1.6.5. > > For components that are targetted at Java 1.4+, I'd say drop the M1 > build files entirely, as IMO they don't offer any benefit, and are > confusing unless they are maintained in synch with the M2 files.
If they work I see no need to delete. > For other components, then the Ant and/or M1 builds need to be maintained. I agree, but we can still use m2 to create releases. Niall > > Niall > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new PMC members as > > > usual? :-) > > > > > > Henry, did I cover the Incubator idea correctly? Feel free to change > > > directly in > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/pmc/commons/reports/board > > > > > > ...or let me know. > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > -- > > > Apache Commons Board Report, March 2008 > > > > > > General > > > ======= > > > > > > o Activity > > > > > > The past few months have been quite busy. A couple of releases > > > (see below) > > > have gone out. Based on http://markmail.org/ user activity is > > > slowly > > > declining while activity on the development list has significantly > > > increased at the beginning of the year. It's slowly declining > > > again. > > > > > > Question of dormancy have been raised for 'commons vfs' and > > > 'commons > > > launcher'. > > > > > > o Re-release of old source distributions > > > > > > This has been brought to the board's attention before. For the > > > users > > > convenience we would like to re-package old source releases and > > > provide > > > them also as source jars. This of course affects releases that > > > have been > > > made under ASL 1.1. While new releases have to be ASL 2.0 the > > > current > > > opinion is that (as long as nothing is changed during the > > > process) this > > > "re-packaging" does not classify as a new release. So we can > > > still provide > > > the new artifact under ASL 1.1. Basically it would have to > > > adhere to the > > > rules when the orignal release has been made. > > > > > > No action has been taking yet. I would be great to get the board's > > > agreement on the PMC's notion. > > > > > > o Commons Sandbox Incubator > > > > > > While the Commons Sandbox works quite straight forward for ASF > > > internal > > > use. The question is what to do with external component level code > > > donations that may or may not been already covered by CLA. > > > Building a > > > community around a single component inside the normal Incubator > > > might > > > be tough. The idea has been brought up to work with Labs or the > > > Incubator > > > to find a solution to this. > > > > > > o Removal of Cobertura reports (as the resulting reports may GPL) > > > > > > Cobertura is a code coverage plugin for maven. It's been used > > > through the > > > ASF to generate reports that are part of the website. As at > > > least parts > > > of the generated site is covered by the GPL we decided not to > > > use it > > > anymore. Otherwise we cannot ship the website for a release. > > > > > > o Support for OSGi > > > > > > New Commons releases will now include the metadata that is > > > required to be > > > used inside OSGi out of the box. > > > > > > o We got two new components into the Commons sandbox > > > > > > - monitoring > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Monitoring > > > > > > - commons build plugin > > > > > > Which got promoted to proper pretty much straight away for the > > > infrastructure and build improvements (see below) > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/ > > > 200802.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > Releases > > > ======== > > > > > > o Released > > > - commons SCXML 0.7 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200712.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons pool 1.4 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200801.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons sandbox parent POM 3 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200801.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons IO 1.4 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200801.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons fileupload 1.2.1 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons math 1.2 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons build plugin 1.0 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons proxy 1.0 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200802.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons parent POM 6 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200801.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons parent POM 7 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200801.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons parent POM 8 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200803.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons sandbox parent POM 4 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200803.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - commons parent POM 9 http://mail-archives.apache.org/ > > > mod_mbox/commons-dev/200803.mbox/% > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Infrastructure > > > ============== > > > > > > o The maven based release process has been discussed and improved. > > > o For some components missing/broken redirects from jakarta have > > > been fixed. > > > o Old bugzilla entries have been removed and we are 100% jira now. > > > We hope > > > to get redirects in place so people will not hit broken links > > > but get to > > > correct jira issue instead. > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/200803.mbox/ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Community > > > ========= > > > > > > o No new committers > > > o No new PMC members > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
