On Jan 3, 2008 11:53 AM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:46 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 6:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > > On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Jan 3, 2008 10:35 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The tars/zips are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/
>
> The build.xml uses the old way of running JUnit in which the
> user has to point t
Apologies - I should have voted given my license question.
Anyway, +1 to continuing along with this - dependency licensing will
need figuring out for sure.
Hen
On Jan 3, 2008 7:57 AM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote has been open for over a week and has
> received the followin
On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The tars/zips are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/
The build.xml uses the old way of running JUnit in which the
user has to point to a junit.jar; rather than which allows
junit to be placed in the ANT_HOME/l
On Jan 3, 2008 4:16 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 10:55 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:50 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I've created a page on our wiki [1] where I have tried to show which
> > > build syst
Ugh, my bad. Yes, that class needs to be created. Should just follow
the pattern of SynchronizedDescriptiveStatistics.
Phil
On Jan 3, 2008 5:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The org.apache.commons.math.stat.descriptive.SummaryStatistics class javadoc
> references a SynchronizedSummaryStatist
Load tests using sandbox/performance with the config below picked up
(number of makes - number of destroys) = maxActive + 1 under both pool
1.2 and 1.4-RC1. What is going on is that the config enables the idle
object evictor and sets minIdle > 0 and makes the "evictor" run
frequently. When it run
On Jan 3, 2008 12:40 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph Kutzinski wrote:
> > - creating a new object means the pool is exhausted which in turn usually
> > means that we have a high-load situation.
> > - creation of new objects is expensive (probably even more in high-load
> >
I'm always interested, but it's always been somewhere down my list of
priorities :(
If Siegfried is able to drive it to release quality, I can likely
start using it in a number of places which will increase my
involvement.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Brett
On 04/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 3, 2008 9:00 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
> >>
> > According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
> > of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
>
> That was my concern
>
> > Therefor
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
--
|| c
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by StephenColebourne:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
[collections] can only be built completely using ant
On Jan 3, 2008 10:55 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:50 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I've created a page on our wiki [1] where I have tried to show which
> > build systems are used by the different Commons components. Both proper
> > and sandbox com
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
--
|| jci
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by NiallPemberton:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
--
=
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:50 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've created a page on our wiki [1] where I have tried to show which
> build systems are used by the different Commons components. Both proper
> and sandbox components are represented, but in separate sections.
>
> [1] http://wi
Hi
I've created a page on our wiki [1] where I have tried to show which
build systems are used by the different Commons components. Both proper
and sandbox components are represented, but in separate sections.
The page also has a little marking for "primary build system". To get
reasonable values
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
Set primary build system for proper components. Took va
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
Remove commons-nightly
---
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
Add build systems for proper components
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
Add build systems for sandbox components, including bes
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
The comment on the change is:
Add an overview of the different build systems that we
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsCommitters
--
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 19:46 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 6:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I'd prefer if we could keep the section about
> > >> maven-remot
On Jan 3, 2008 6:56 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'd prefer if we could keep the section about
> >> maven-remote-resources-plugin that is under pluginManagement. That way
> >> we c
Christoph Kutzinski wrote:
> - creating a new object means the pool is exhausted which in turn usually
> means that we have a high-load situation.
> - creation of new objects is expensive (probably even more in high-load
> situations). This is why we originally used the pool
> - so in conclusion
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
The version number in the pom will be updated automatically during the
release process.
[ ] +1
[ ] =0
[ ] -1
Vote is open for 72 hours
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd prefer if we could keep the section about
>> maven-remote-resources-plugin that is under pluginManagement. That way
>> we can ensure that those components that decide to use it, all use the
>> same ve
On Jan 3, 2008 5:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd prefer if we could keep the section about
> maven-remote-resources-plugin that is under pluginManagement. That way
> we can ensure that those components that decide to use it, all use the
> same version.
Currrently all compon
+1.
On Jan 3, 2008 9:34 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/3/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been quite a few changes to commons-parent since version 5
> > was released so I'd like to release version 6.
>
> >
> > [X] +1
> > [ ] =0
> > [
On 1/3/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been quite a few changes to commons-parent since version 5
> was released so I'd like to release version 6.
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] =0
> [ ] -1
>
-Rahul
-
To un
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/JensKapitza
The comment on the change is:
Please do not create a "private page".
--
I'd prefer if we could keep the section about
maven-remote-resources-plugin that is under pluginManagement. That way
we can ensure that those components that decide to use it, all use the
same version.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: niallp
> Date: Thu Jan 3 05:00:26 2008
> New Revision: 60847
This vote has been open for over a week and has
received the following votes:
+1:
Matt Benson
Jörg Schaible
+/-0:
(None)
-1:
(None)
Despite the underwhelming :) turnout, AIUI this vote
passes. That being the case, I will begin the IP
clearance process. Anyone with experience in that
a
On Jan 3, 2008 2:30 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X ] +1
> [ ] =0
> [ ] -1
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
-
To
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so
>> I think we can give it a test drive :)
>>
>> Attached is a patch for the parent pom of commons and one to demonstra
On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so
> I think we can give it a test drive :)
>
> Attached is a patch for the parent pom of commons and one to demonstrate
> how to add support for OSG
Hi,
There have been quite a few changes to commons-parent since version 5
was released so I'd like to release version 6. The changes since the
last release in summary:
Changes to the site.xml:
- Upgrade to version 2 of Commons Skin (adds ApacheCon logo to m2
sites via CSS, as per m1)
- Add Ap
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by JensKapitza:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/JensKapitza
The comment on the change is:
create private page
New page:
##language:de
== Jens Kapitz
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Exec
--
- Describe E
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Exec
New page:
Describe Exec here.
The org.apache.commons.math.stat.descriptive.SummaryStatistics class javadoc
references a SynchronizedSummaryStatistics class for concurrent access. This
class does not exist. Should it be created for 1.2 or should the link be removed
?
Luc
---
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/FrontPage
--
On th
Just noticed that NOTICE.txt says:
Copyright 2002-2007 The Apache Software Foundation
There are probably some other instances of 2007 which need to be updated.
On 03/01/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source distros look okay, but can it be that the binary distros are
> missi
The source distros look okay, but can it be that the binary distros are
missing the binaries? Both the zip and the tar.gz only contain LICENSE
and NOTICE and the site directory.
Other than that I only found a few (very minor) points:
- When building with the different build systems the resulting j
On 03.01.2008, at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
That was my concern
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, but I've been very busy in the last weeks.
I still wanted to make some comments on the changes to the synchronization in
GenericObjectPool (and that like) - not sure which JIRA number refers to that.
I think one of the few good things about the strong synchronizatio
Selon Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
> >>
> > According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
> > of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
>
> That was my concern
>
> > Therefore I see two options
> >
Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
According to the website moving to proper requires an "active group
of committers" - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
That was my concern
Therefore I see two options
+) one existing committer teams up with me (preferred but rather
Hi Torsten,
see my comments below
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 02.01.2008, at 19:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed a few things on commons-exec but I'm not sure how to proceed
from here since I'm the last/only man standing.
1) I nearly finished the open
51 matches
Mail list logo
