On Jan 3, 2008 4:16 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 10:55 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 22:50 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I've created a page on our wiki [1] where I have tried to show which > > > build systems are used by the different Commons components. Both proper > > > and sandbox components are represented, but in separate sections. > > <snip> > > > > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems > > > > > > > Thanks Dennis, that looks useful. Things are actually more consistent > > than I expected :-). > > > > I'd definitely like to see the next Digester release use maven2. > > > > The new new OSGi stuff seems a good reason to make a new Digester > > release; once it's ready upstream I'll try to make time to work on that. > > If you could spare some time to help with maven2 stuff for Digester that > > would be great. > > AFAIK the m2 build is pretty much ready to use. The main difference is > that the m2 binary distro includes the site, but the m1 only javadocs > - thats easy to change if required. Otherwise I think the only other > thing is to upgrade to commons-parent-6 if/when its released (fixes > the duplicate notice/license issue caused by remote resources plugin). > > Try something like "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly" to produce the > jars, source and binary distros and see what you think. > > Niall > > Niall
Thanks to all of you guys for helping move this along. While I am in process of pushing out a m1 release for [pool], I hope this will be my last and I went that route only because there is some urgency to get this release out. Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
