Re: [pool] POOL-97 timer patch

2007-12-28 Thread Phil Steitz
Yes, I saw this with both the pool and dbcp tests when I set the timeBetweenEvictionRuns to a positive number On 12/28/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > I am not sure whether this is actually a bug, or worth reopening > > POOL-97, but want to be safe rather than s

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Matt Benson
--- Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > Thanks for the links. I have reviewed them in the > past, but will do so again. > > I did attach a patch file w/ my requested change in > JIRA and reviewing > Launcher's other open issues I see that most people > have done the > same. > >

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/28/07, Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > Thanks for the links. I have reviewed them in the past, but will do so again. > I doubt anything has changed, if you've seen them, you're upto speed :-) > I did attach a patch file w/ my requested change in JIRA and reviewing > Lau

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Mark Horn
Rahul, Thanks for the links. I have reviewed them in the past, but will do so again. I did attach a patch file w/ my requested change in JIRA and reviewing Launcher's other open issues I see that most people have done the same. Any committers willing to help? :) On 12/28/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EM

Re: [pool] POOL-97 timer patch

2007-12-28 Thread Mark Thomas
Phil Steitz wrote: > I am not sure whether this is actually a bug, or worth reopening > POOL-97, but want to be safe rather than sorry before releasing 1.4. > > I am getting JVM hangs with the current code when I fail to close the > pool. This did not happen with the 1.3 code. The (admittedly sl

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/28/07, Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is Commons-Launcher still active? The last release appears to be > quite some time ago ( Jan. 2005 ) and issues/feature requests have > been logged into JIRA (including one by myself) but there does not > seem to be any activity on the project wh

Re: [pool] 1.4-RC1 available for review

2007-12-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/28/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The tars/zips are here: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/ > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/docs/ > > Release Notes: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > No testing, just

Re: [all] Deleting STATUS.html files

2007-12-28 Thread Ben Speakmon
+1 for banishment to the land of wind and ghosts. On Dec 27, 2007 3:11 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/27/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any +1s to delete the STATUS.html files? > > > > Many are out of date and I don't see that they add much value even > > w

[Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Mark Horn
Is Commons-Launcher still active? The last release appears to be quite some time ago ( Jan. 2005 ) and issues/feature requests have been logged into JIRA (including one by myself) but there does not seem to be any activity on the project what so ever. Is there a better alternative to commons-laun

[pool] 1.4-RC1 available for review

2007-12-28 Thread Phil Steitz
The tars/zips are here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/ Site: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/docs/ Release Notes: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.4-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt This is an "old-style" RC - i.e., these are *not* release bits, nor do I expect to ca

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Two things: - if the bundle plugin could be released, it'd be great, if not projects won't be able to make a release - my approach to add an osgified manifest to the current project is different in order not to change the packaging to bundle. bundle packaging only needs to be used to osgify 3rd p

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-28 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so I think we can give it a test drive :) Attached is a patch for the parent pom of commons and one to demonstrate how to add support for OSGi to commons-lang. The changes to the parent pom are minimal: it just adds the ma

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-12-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This