On Dec 9, 2007 4:46 PM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On Dec 2, 2007 11:09 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Tomcat has been bitten [1] by a bug [2] in pool-1.3. Currently we are
> >>> considering reverting to
> they are. I'm -0 on the spectrogram, having personally spent time
> trying to use a naive spectrogram as a power spectrum estimator. I
> only spent enough time on that task
> to come to the understanding that it wasn't as simple as it seemed
> it should be.
it is easy, example Matlab code (may
On Dec 9, 2007 11:02 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 2:27 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On Dec 9, 2007 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > >>> On Dec 9, 2007 12:
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2007 11:09 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tomcat has been bitten [1] by a bug [2] in pool-1.3. Currently we are
>>> considering reverting to pool-1.2 but would obviously prefer to move to
>>> pool-1.4 (that included a
On Dec 9, 2007 2:27 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2007 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Dec 9, 2007 12:42 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
when you do mvn help:effective-pom -Prelease everything looks good.
Seems that something though is still picking up that dummy repository
though and I'm guessing the -Darguments="-Prelease" that Torsten
mentions here http://tinyurl.com/2h222s is perhaps something to do
with that? But for me tha
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 12:42 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrot
On Dec 9, 2007 1:40 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 2007 12:42 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 12:42 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For logging I follow
On Dec 9, 2007 12:42 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For logging I followed t
Niall, I'd like to try to use the remote-resources plugin for adding
license and notice files. It worked well for the logging release.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niallp
Date: Sun Dec 9 04:24:30 2007
New Revision: 602666
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=602666&view=rev
Log:
Add LICE
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 8, 2007 4:06 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/7/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For releases support artifacts that reside only in the Central repo
(parent poms, skin) I have simply done:
- vote based on svn revisions
- mvn release
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 12/7/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK how about I just upload the artifacts manually - that seems the
simpest solution.
Sounds good. Do the jars contain LICENSE / NOTICE files? Just saw that
skin-1.0 jars do not!
I'll take a look at that.
Then w
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For logging I followed the current release p
On 09/12/2007, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2007 12:28 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for it.
> >
> > If it is trunk, then there might be a problem as there seem to be
> > several Java 1.5 depende
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 11:32 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 9:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For logging I followed the current release procedure [1], which worked
well. Sections 11 and 12 need to be merged
Apologies as Rahul pointed out the commons-skin build doesn't
currently put the license and notice files in the jar - so I'm going
to abort this attempt to release - and next time stage the jar for
review first before voting.
Niall
On Dec 6, 2007 9:35 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Dec 8, 2007 4:06 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/7/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > For releases support artifacts that reside only in the Central repo
> > (parent poms, skin) I have simply done:
> > - vote based on svn revisions
> > - mvn release:pr
On Dec 8, 2007 4:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/7/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > OK how about I just upload the artifacts manually - that seems the
> > simpest solution.
>
>
> Sounds good. Do the jars contain LICENSE / NOTICE files? Just saw that
On Dec 9, 2007 12:28 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for it.
>
> If it is trunk, then there might be a problem as there seem to be
> several Java 1.5 dependencies (asserts).
AIUI assertions were introduced in JDK 1.4:
http:
20 matches
Mail list logo