Mark Thomas wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: >> On Dec 2, 2007 11:09 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Tomcat has been bitten [1] by a bug [2] in pool-1.3. Currently we are >>> considering reverting to pool-1.2 but would obviously prefer to move to >>> pool-1.4 (that included a fix for [2]) due to the many fixes in 1.3. >>> >>> A quick scan of the archives suggests that an offer of an extra pair of >>> hands might help speed up a pool-1.4 release in the near term. So, here I >>> am. >> Thanks! This is exactly what is needed. > > OK. I have trunk checked out and building. I'll starting looking at > POOL-86, POOL-97, POOL-93 & POOL-108 in terms of reviewing what is there > and developing patches where there are gaps. I'll need to get my head > around the pool code so I might be quiet for a couple of days. > > I'll add JIRA comments when I have something useful to say.
I have taken a look at each of the issues above. Comments added to JIRA. In summary: POOL-86 - The patch in JIRA looks good to me POOL-93 - Proposed improved patch based on patches in JIRA POOL-97 - Proposed alternative patch that fixes 97 without a regression POOL-108 - Proposed improved patch (see POOL-93) based on patch in JIRA I'm happy to re-work any/all of the patches if required. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
