I think it is important to identify what is exclusively for Cloudstack and what
all can be reused across multiple services.
1. Authentication - Typically enterprises/service providers would like to reuse
their existing authentication systems. So an easy mechanism needs to be
provided for integr
Ilya,
Can you check in the MS logs if more than one thread tries to process connect
for the same host simultaneously? In case of XS I had seen that there is a
possibility of the vm states getting incorrectly determined (during vm sync) in
case more than one thread tries to process connect to the
This is a very useful feature. Can this be extended to the other system VMs?
SSVM and CPVM
Based on the discussion I see that there is an assumption that restarting
services/rebooting should fix the issues. Is that always true? What if the
service fails to restart after repeated attempts? What
It is already a global setting in 4.2. The name of the setting is
"execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands".
Check out Config.java
ExecuteInSequence("Advanced", ManagementServer.class, Boolean.class,
"execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands", "true", "If set to true,
StartCommand, StopComm
Hi Steve,
Welcome to CloudStack. Looking forward to working with you.
On 02-Oct-2013, at 6:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Welcome Steve!
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined
our reply, but unfortunately, this setting does NOT cover
> 'MigrateCommand'.
> As you specified, it seems to be effective only in Start/Stop/CopyCommand.
>
> So can we include 'MigrateCommand' in that setting?
>
> Thanks
> Alex Ough
>
>
> On We
On 10-Oct-2013, at 9:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Does anyone have any reservations about changing the volume identifier in
> KVM's volume creation command to be the uuid of the volume? Currently for
> new volumes it generates a random uuid and passes that back to be stored in
> the database.
Views are meant to be read only. So +1 for removing setters.
On 04-Oct-2013, at 10:59 PM, "SuichII, Christopher"
wrote:
> *JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable.
> I think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential
> confusion as sett
I was making some changes in the storage pool allocators related to some bug
fix and came across this code snippet in planDeplyment() method of
DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java.
In this if the checkClustersforDestination() returns null and the 'avoids'
parameter is not correctly updated (one s
is reasoning. I will add that limit.
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:19 AM
> To:
> Subject: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?
>
> I was making som
On 16-Oct-2013, at 3:12 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:43 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanner?
>
>
> Thanks for the explanati
Agree with Marcus here.
If we are planning to rewrite, I think that there should be some discussion
around the possibility of making it a direct agent like XS/Vmware. If this is
possible then installing the KVM agent on individual hosts will be eliminated.
On 17-Oct-2013, at 8:49 PM, Marcus Sor
21 AM, Prachi Damle
mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>> wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com<http://citrix.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:21 AM
To: mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in DeploymentPlanne
mption in canAvoidCluster(). The scenario I am
seeing is the latter where there is no pools in the allocator avoid set. So as
you suggested in this case as well the cluster needs to be in avoid set.
>
> Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@c
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#comment52933>
Why this is changed to protected?
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/SSHKeyPairResponse.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#comment52934>
Protected? This is not required
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 18, 201
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/#review27250
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m
Congrats Animesh!
On 22-Oct-2013, at 12:31 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they
> have accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Animesh!
>
> -The CloudStack
I was looking at the command sequencing logic in the agent code.
Each agent maintains a sequence that gets initialised based on following logic
private static final Random s_rand = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis());
_nextSequence = s_rand.nextInt(Short.MAX_VALUE) << 48;
For every co
Congrats Talluri!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:07 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Srikanteswara
> Talluri to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
> accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contribut
Congrats Sowmya!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya
> Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
> accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to con
Congrats Girish!
On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:08 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Girish
> Shilamkar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
> accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to co
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4944 to track this
issue.
Alex, Any reason for adding requests based on sequence and not doing FIFO? Do
you see any issues if request always gets added to the end of the queue?
On 23-Oct-2013, at 6:26 PM, Koushik Das wrote:
> I
ink when commands originate from the
> management server, it doesn't go through this code. This is if the command
> came from the agent which doesn't matter if there's multiple management
> servers.
>
> --Alex
>
>> -----Original Message-
>>
7d3f765
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15080/diff/
Testing
---
Verified by tweaking the per agent upper cap to a value of 1 and checked that
the requests are getting scheduled but the executor thread simply bails out.
Thanks,
Koushik Das
chema/src/com/cloud/service/ServiceOfferingVO.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#comment54675>
Again this is not required
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/service/dao/ServiceOfferingDaoImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#comment54674>
ordering of parameter is n
setup/db/db/schema-421to430.sql
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15018/#comment54681>
Simply drop and recreate the view
- Koushik Das
On Oct. 31, 2013, 10:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an aut
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15018/#review28183
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 5, 2013, 10:34 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#review28355
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 7, 2013, 6:24 a.m
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:17 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
> > Ship It!
commit 7095ea2b5e497620c8c879517565046e3b46e493
- Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15173/#re
Is your data volume and VM on the same host? If not then the volume cannot be
attached to the VM in case of a local volume.
-Koushik
On 07-Nov-2013, at 4:03 PM, Antonio Petrocelli
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i've this error when i try to attach a volume to vm:
>
> "Failed to attach local data volu
>From what I understand, now there is a new interface Configurable that exposes
>the config parameters. In this case if you look at the
>CapacityManagerImpl.java, there is a method getCongigKeys() that return the
>config parameters. During MS startup all these are automatically populated in
>th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/#review28538
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m
4.3 -> 6a8ec786ad2a843768c26099e17f89782cd77f75
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:24 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
I see the JCE extensions in jdk 1.7 as well. They are present under
/jre/lib/security. But still I see a test failure. Is there any
other configuration that is required?
Running org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServiceTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.456
();
On 12-Nov-2013, at 11:35 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> I see the JCE extensions in jdk 1.7 as well. They are present under
> /jre/lib/security. But still I see a test failure. Is there any
> other configuration that is required?
>
> Running org.apache.cloudstack.network.lb.CertServ
Congrats Sanjeev
On 14-Nov-2013, at 11:29 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjeev
> Neelarapu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
> accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#comment55923>
Is there any other changes in this file? If not remove it.
framework/config/src/org/apache/cloudstack/framework/config/impl/ConfigDepotImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#comment55924>
this is not required
- Koushik Das
On Nov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15507/#review28947
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Nov. 14, 2013, 9:25 a.m
I have reverted the same in 4.3 as well
commit f84b729eb01ffc7cae1e210b58f80ff2033ad785
Author: Koushik Das
Date: Fri Nov 15 12:59:48 2013 +0530
Revert "CLOUDSTACK-5176:"
This reverts commit f29c7188ba03f1997238d50f8a11857e94fe4b55.
On 15-Nov-2013, at 10:35 AM
/xenserver/xcposs. This also
needs to be fixed for devcloud to work
- Koushik Das
On May 17, 2013, 1:56 p.m., sanjeev n wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
The problem is that there is no default ctor in XcpServerResource.java. Now the
default ctor was changed to a non-default one by this commit. Adding a default
ctor should fix the issue but need to check if there will be any other side
effects due to the version field introduced.
commit 63630a41
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/11221/#comment42836>
For other entries I see different target paths. What should be the correct
one in these cases?
- Koushik Das
On May 20, 2013, 6:44 a.m., sanjeev n wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatica
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11221/#review20768
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On May 20, 2013, 1:14 p.m
Congrats Wei!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:53 AM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Wei Zhou to become a committer
Congrats Swamy!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:52 AM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Venkata Swamy to become
Congrats Sailaja!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:52 AM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Sailaja Mada to become
It is better to add constraints in the db for all uuid fields. That way uuid
field will never get missed out. I see that for some tables there is a NOT NULL
constraint.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 4:09 AM
> To
Congrats Sangeetha!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 11:50 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sangeetha Hariharan
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/#review20991
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On May 24, 2013, 10:19 a.m
NetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment43575>
message says apply but this for revoke. right? also dhcp has become "dhco"
server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/114
er/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#comment43593>
The message says apply, should be revoke.
- Koushik Das
On May 27, 2013, 3:23 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
>
om/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#comment43619>
You have the cidr which can be used as well in dhcp-range parameter.
- Koushik Das
On May 27, 2013, 3:05 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> -
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:02 AM, murali reddy
> wrote:
> > We should do a health-check of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21311
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:10 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/#review21314
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 1:08 p.m
What is the difference between these interfaces? I see that StaticNat is used
in network elements. And StaticNatRule used elsewhere including APIs. Given
that PF and FW rules uses a single interface everywhere, should a similar thing
be there for static nat rules as well?
-Koushik
+0
If proposed features are completed earlier then we shouldn't wait for 4 weeks.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
imple -> 1 commit = 1
bug fix
- Koushik Das
On June 4, 2013, 2:51 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://review
set to false, but the code is still moving ahead.
Previously there was a return So the remaining code should only be executed if
(result == true).
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:27 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment44842>
if result_final == false, why is txn committed?
- Koushik Das
On June 3, 2013, 10:27 a.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment44863>
why not pass the 'caller' parameter to handleIpAliasDelete?
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#comment44862>
why is both rollback and commit done
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#review21791
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On June 12, 2013, 10:59 a.m
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 6:32 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Using "In Progress" status in JIRA
>
> Folks
>
> It seems that we do not use "In Progress" status in JIRA as often as we
Congrats Jayapal
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:02 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack ha
Ideally if the fix involves schema changes then it should go to 4.2. If there
is no alternative then 410to411.sql looks like the option. But then the upgrade
path becomes complicated. The following needs to be handled 4.1.0 -> 4.2.0,
4.1.1 -> 4.2.0. Or else the upgrade sql script needs to be gua
Congrats Mike!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: FW: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mike Tutkowski
>
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
>
This looks like a serious issue. Cloudstack goes into a bad state due to this.
From the UI the host first needs to be put into maintenance and only after that
the host can be deleted. But if deleteHost API is directly invoked there is no
such restriction (there is no check to see the ResourceSta
That's right. Cloudstack relies on native HA capabilities provided by vSphere.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Kosinski [mailto:kirkkosin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:30 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
That's correct. Currently all messages are hard-coded in the Java code. First
all these strings needs to be moved out to something like a 'resource file' and
only then they can be localized.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursda
Hi Nicolas,
This issue got fixed as part of CLOUDSTACK-595. The fix is present in 4.0 and
onwards. I will resolve 531 as a duplicate of 595.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:59 PM
>
Should it fall back on the compute offering tags if disk offering tags cannot
be satisfied? This will make the behavior compatible with that of deploying VM
from template.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2
This is fixed as part of CLOUDSTACK-3445 in master and 4.2. The issue was with
local storage pool used bytes getting wrongly stored as you noted.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:46 AM
> To: dev@cl
I am also seeing it.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:22 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Template Question
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed recently on XenServer when SSVM and CPVM are dep
. updateCluster needs to
be fixed as updateConfiguration is a generic approach and shouldn't be broken
for handling a special scenario.
- Koushik Das
On July 17, 2013, 7:37 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatic
in the code everywhere based on over provisioning factor. Please
open a new bug for future to store used/total capacity values in db. based on
same scale factor.
- Koushik Das
On July 19, 2013, 10:14 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/#review23577
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On July 19, 2013, 10:14 a.m
The code needs to handle the case when the db. entry is not present. It should
fall back on some default value.
-Koushik
On 21-Jul-2013, at 12:38 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> Thanks Vijay. I just figured out that trick myself:) I will check in a fix
> to 4.2, seems that he forgot to seed this config
Commit id: 2d4464d2badc9aff842fd180bafc4c384a83a91d
-return new URI(scheme + "://" + value);
+// do we need to check that value does not contain a scheme
+// part?
+if (value.toString().contains(":"))
+return new U
RE: System VMs not coming up due to https://reviews.apache.org/r/12685/
Where are you getting your system VM from?
DL
> -Original Message-----
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: 22 July 2013 11:09 AM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: S
ld be the correct code for the function that is your culprit, but master
> doesn't work due to database mismatches between the code and the databse
> schema. I will test this as soon as possible.
>
> regards,
> Daan
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:18 PM,
e that upgraded setups work fine as well.
- Koushik Das
On July 23, 2013, 10:02 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.
For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.
> -Original Message-
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks! I had
views.apache.org/r/12808/
> ---
>
> (Updated July 23, 2013, 11:41 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Nitin Mehta.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1528 and CLOUDSTACK-2536
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12808/#review23823
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On July 25, 2013, 7:19 a.m
I raised this in a separate thread. Daan created a new patch
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ to address backward compat.
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:12 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DI
Rajesh,
You can look at the check-in history for schema-410to420.sql for the changes
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 5:03 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Request to inform which DB command to run on
I see this in the review request
Review 13189 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #99 is :
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/99/
Can you address this?
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sa
nd of correlation would be much more useful.
- Koushik Das
On July 30, 2013, 5:37 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.a
Cmd , MgmtId: 2546680725505, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 100011,
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.StopCommand":{"isProxy":false,"executeInSequence":false,"vmName":"i-2-45-VM","wait":0}}]
}
The changes you have made would definitely improve the readability.
-Koushik
From: Mar
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Ram Ganesh [mailto:ram.gan...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 4:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] [jira] make affectedVersion field mandatory.
>
> Hi,
>
> While triaging bugs I noticed that many bugs had affectedVer
+1. Provided git allows to make a specific file as read-only.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 12:01 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Saksham Srivastava
> Subject: Re: Reverting 17267794adb2bab923fb20515a7b943780d61
The increase in deployVM time is due to the dedicated resources feature. I have
updated the issue with my analysis. Need some inputs from the original devs.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:3
or the same.
Also what is logic for multiplying the speed with 0.99?
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 9, 2013, 1 p.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://rev
Congrats Vijay!
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:31 AM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Vija
info.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.884 sec <<<
FAILURE!
Results :
Failed tests:
testScaleVMF3(com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBaseTest): (..)
Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skip
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13441/#review24978
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On Aug. 11, 2013, 5:28 p.m
I noticed that the upgrade sql script (earlier used to be schema-410to420.sql)
has been renamed and in the process all the change history is lost. Can we
ensure as a process to do a proper git file rename instead of creating a new
file so that the changes history is not lost? In this case is the
b8b456e652d47f2a6;hb=e61a38087
> d158da51f7b945d16e4749a83512ab5
>
> Regards,
> Devdeep
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:50 PM
> > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> >
Also refer
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack
for the list of nonoss jars that needs to be installed before doing the build.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: La Motta, David [mailto:david.lamo...@netapp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14,
Agree. The message should indicate the root cause of the problem and the
solution.
-Koushik
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
>
> +1
1 - 100 of 926 matches
Mail list logo
