For now I think cloud-utils is the best option.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> Thanks! I had looked at that initially, but found this disclaimer on the 
> source
> website :
> "Warning:
>  not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.11 should be considered to be of "Alpha" quality!"
> 
> I do not see a code update in it for the past 4 years, and thus was skeptical.
> Please let me know if we should go ahead with it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Amogh
> 
> On 7/23/13 10:51 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> >Amogh,
> >
> >I added the following to the pom.xml for cisco and it seems to compile
> >with a few extra exceptions try-catch added.  Can you check on if you
> >can use this?
> >
> ><dependency>
> >    <groupId>ca.juliusdavies</groupId>
> >    <artifactId>not-yet-commons-ssl</artifactId>
> >    <version>0.3.11</version>
> ></dependency>
> >
> >--Alx
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:25 PM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >>
> >> Isn't this in commons-httpclient 3.1?
> >>
> >> http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-
> >> httpclient/commons-
> >> httpclient/3.1/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl/EasyX509Trus
> >> tM
> >> anager.java
> >>
> >> --Alex
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 9:41 PM
> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> > @Frank, it is not a re-implementation, but a copy.
> >> >
> >> > On 7/24/13 2:14 AM, "Amogh Vasekar" <amogh.vase...@citrix.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >In the absence of an officially published jar on maven for
> >> > >contrib-ssl, the current idea is to put this package in
> >> > >cloud-utils (it is a dependency for both cisco-vnmc and ucs) for
> >> > >easier
> >>maintenance.
> >> > >Please let me know if this sounds good.
> >> > >
> >> > >Thanks,
> >> > >Amogh
> >> > >
> >> > >On 7/22/13 5:26 PM, "Frank Zhang" <frank.zh...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>I prefer to just use httpclient-contribs.jar as it has been
> >> > >>proven by lots of users.
> >> > >>Reimplementing such code brings no gain but maintenance effort.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >>> From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com]
> >> > >>> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:17 PM
> >> > >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > >>> Subject: Inclusion of commons-httpclient-contrib jar
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Hi All,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I was working on a HTTPS related fix, and found this package in
> >> > >>>the codebase :
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/master/plugins/networ
> >> > >>> k-
> >> > >>> elements/c
> >> > >>> isco-vnmc/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/contrib/ssl
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I need to use the same classes, which are already a part of
> >> > >>>httpclient-contribs  jar
> >> > >>>
> >> >
> >>>(http://www.java2s.com/Code/Jar/c/Downloadcommonshttpclientcon
> >> tr
> >> > ib31jar.
> >> > >>> htm
> >> > >>> )
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Was wondering if there is a specific reason the jar was not
> >> > >>>included instead  (probably since it is a contrib jar?)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thanks,
> >> > >>> Amogh
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >

Reply via email to