RE: Questions about 4.2 RC

> -Original Message- > From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:22 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Questions about 4.2 RC > > Hi, > > I followed the testing procedure for the 4.2 RC, I am ready to vote +1 but I > hav

RE: Questions about 4.2 RC

t; > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 2:15 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi > >> Subject: Re: Questions about

RE: [ACS42] KVM upgrade path to 4.2

Santhanam" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 9:51:53 AM > Subject: Re: [ACS42] KVM upgrade path to 4.2 > > Hi Edison, > > I've just added these steps to the doc bug that was linked to the it at > CLOUDSTACK-4550 > > > On

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

In order to support it, I need to manually, find a way to install CLVM(find an ISCSI disk, create CLVM on it etc) in my Lab, a lot of work to do. Is it possible, I write some code, then have you help to test? I almost finished the code. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mail

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

: Friday, September 6, 2013 5:08:53 PM > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round) > > By the way, not sure if it was clear but the template download portion > worked just fine. > On Sep 6, 2013 3:45 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: > > > In order to support

RE: Question: Supported API calls in the Simulator

The current implementation of simulator has its own limitation: the simulator itself is a separate hypervisor type, thus a lot of condition checks against hypervisor type in mgt server will fail if simulator is used. For example, currently, the zone wide primary storage only works for vmware and

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)

+1(binding), tested on devcloud, and based on the QA's recently test result, seems it's stabilized for a while now(QA team didn't "bother" me for a few weeks:)) > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:43

RE: Build failure on master (KVM related)

We should be cautious to advance java version, as most of our code run/tested on java 6. Is it a must to upgrade to Libvirt 0.5.0? > -Original Message- > From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 11:34 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject:

RE: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI

How about use maven-exec->call grunt->compile CSS? http://addyosmani.com/blog/making-maven-grunt/ This is more flexible than sass-maven-plugin, as we can do lot of stuff in grunt, such unit test. > -Original Message- > From: Brian Federle [mailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM To: cloudstack Cc: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com; Edison Su Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi All, Thank you for a great work on CloudStack! We are interested in integrating CS with

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

, March 21, 2013 1:14 PM To: Vladimir Popovski Cc: Edison Su; cloudstack Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Very useful info, Edison - thanks!! By the way, can you confirm for me that this storage plug-in framework is expected to work for all hypervisors supported by CS in 4.2. Thanks

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

See below. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:33 PM To: Edison Su Cc: Vladimir Popovski; cloudstack Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi Edison, Can you get a little more into the details of how this framework works? For

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Feedback/comments are appreciated, need to know your input from storage vendor point of view. From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:52 AM To: Edison Su; cloudstack Cc: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin

RE: VNC listen address for KVM

At least, need to revert the following change: - GraphicDef grap = new GraphicDef("vnc", (short) 0, true, null, null, + GraphicDef grap = new GraphicDef("vnc", (short) 0, true, vmTO.getVncAddr(), null, null); in LibvirtComputingResource

RE: VNC listen address for KVM

t; > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:11:56PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > > At least, need to revert the following change: > > - GraphicDef grap = new GraphicDef("vnc", (short) 0, true, > > null, null, > > + GraphicDef grap = new G

Review Request: bug fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1772

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1772 Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java 1c25321 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10070/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, edison su

RE: Issue regarding SSVM on DevCloud

> -Original Message- > From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:36 PM > To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Issue regarding SSVM on DevCloud > > Hi, > I was able to create a zone and configure it successfully. But have problem > wit

RE: Issue regarding SSVM on DevCloud

m SSVM? > > Thanks. > Kausal Malladi > www.kausalmalladi.tk > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Kausal Malladi [mailto:mkau...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Friday, March 22,

Review Request: Volumes with storage tags can't be attached

: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1791 Diffs - core/src/com/cloud/storage/StoragePoolVO.java af6e4e2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10094/diff/ Testing --- Attach volume succeed. Thanks, edison su

RE: [ACS41] Status

431 should be fixed already few months ago. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Marcus Sorensen Sent: ‎3/‎23/‎2013 3:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS41] Status 1006 I just closed, it e

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-922: LXC Support in Cloudstack

ile for other vms, we use lxc(thus needs lxc connection). Then based on vm's type(which can be got from vm's name), we can know which connection should we use. For example, for command, GetVncPortCommand, the connection is depended on the vm's type. - edison su On March 2

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

: Monday, March 25, 2013 2:37 PM To: Edison Su; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hey Edison, So...if you think my understanding is correct (please check out the e-mail below), then I have a question. Do we really want to have

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

ski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:52 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi Edison, Sounds good. I already have code to create a XenServer Storage Repository (and optiona

Re: Review Request: BugFix CLOUDSTACK-1803: Slashes removed from local storage path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10124/#review18409 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 25, 2013, 8:41 p.m

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

new host into a cluster, the current framework lets storage provider adding a listener which can listen on adding host event. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:45 PM To: Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popov

RE: Attaching Volumes to Windows Instance

Need to install virtio disk pv driver inside Windows guest VM, otherwise the disk will not be shown up. From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen; Edison Su Subject: Re: Attaching Volumes to Windows

RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage in latest Master

> -Original Message- > From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:02 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary > Storage in latest Master > > > > > -

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Comments embedded in below. From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:22 PM To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi All, I was away for couple of days, so sorry

RE: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 1:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Phong Nguyen > Subject: Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute > > > > On 3/28/13 1:04 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal"

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:26 PM To: Edison Su Cc: Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs Hi Edison, Can you clarify what you mean here? [Edison] If there are HV-dependent

[DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

Hi all, I am trying to review some feature branches, when I see merge requests coming from mailing list, one thing that makes code review almost unrealistic is that, developers tend to use "git merge" to master branch whenever rebase is needed. I don't know other people really do review fea

RE: Scalability Limitations

No limitations at the mgt server side. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Mike Tutkowski Sent: ‎3/‎29/‎2013 9:56 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Scalability Limitati

RE: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

> -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:16 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal > > On 30 March 2013 09:20, Justin Grudzien wrote: > > > > My company is building

RE: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Grudzien [mailto:grudz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal > > Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review I > wou

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-922: LXC Support in Cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10122/#review18604 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 26, 2013, 9:02 p.m

RE: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 12:55 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue > > Edison, > >

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1830: ZWPS: NPE while create volume from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10239/#review18615 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On April 2, 2013, 1:53 p.m

RE: [MERGE] scaleupvm functionality branch to master

Happened to take a look at virtualmachinemanagerimpl on master, during reviewing storage migration code. Just want to know, what's the difference between migrate and migrateforscale in VirtualmachineManagerImpl? Is it necessary to duplicate code? > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Meht

RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver

Sorry for the late. Following is my comments on storage motion: 1. We shouldn't touch volume state in virutalmachinemanager. I spend a lot of time trying to move volume related operations from virtualmachinemanager to storage subsystem, better to follow the same pattern. 2. The current storage

How to dramatically reduce the build time:)

As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a way may help you a little bit to build cloudstack as quick as possible: mvn -pl `git status --porcelain |sed '/^?/d'| awk '{print $2}' |sed 's/\/src/$/'|cut -d $ -f 1|uniq |tr "\n" "," |sed 's/,$/,client/'` clean install It trie

RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:19 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents > > That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but > t

RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:29 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents > > > We made a messy cloudstack API already, and it's hard to get rid of > > it, as

RE: How to dramatically reduce the build time:)

ing!!! Reduced build time for me, from 6:45.917s to 1:28.435s > > Thanks Edison! > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Edison Su wrote: > > > As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a > > way may help you a little bit to build cloudstack as q

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 11:33 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring > > We can't deprecate APIs unless we are changing to 5.0 AF

RE: deployDataCenter.py doesn't work for me on master

Have you pre-install xenserver template on nfs://172.16.197.131/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/? > -Original Message- > From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: deployDataCenter.py d

RE: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!

Probably, it's a setup issue, e.g openvswitch doesn't work. I'll take a look QA's environment, if it's still there. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:12 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Hel

RE: createAsync Question

reate a sr from an iscsi lun, and also create a vdi from the sr, then vbd, the attach it to vm. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> Sent: ‎4/‎16/‎2013 1:59 PM To: Edison Su<mailto:edison...@citri

RE: grant/revokeAccess Question

From: Mike Tutkowski<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> Sent: ‎4/‎16/‎2013 12:45 PM To: Edison Su<mailto:edison...@citrix.com>; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org<mailto:cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org> Subject: grant/revokeAccess Question Hi Edison, I forgot to ask you a

Re: Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10196/#review19306 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On April 15, 2013, 7:24 a.m

Re: Review Request: NPE while migrating volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10539/#review19307 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On April 16, 2013, 7:01 a.m

Re: Review Request: Add LXC to hypervisor.list configuration value on fresh install

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10480/#review19310 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On April 15, 2013, 5:48 p.m

RE: Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

Sorry, I don't realize you are not a committer yet. BTW, let me nominate you as a commiter. > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:44 AM > To: Edison Su; Anthony Xu; Abhinandan Prateek (aprat...@ap

RE: no tinyLinux template

The default ttylinux template does not pre-installed in latest devcloud2 virtualbox image, and the system vm can't access public network, thus, can't download tty template. Either it should be fixed by Rohit and upload an new image to his devcloud2 link(http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudst

RE: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

> -Original Message- > From: Jason Pavao [mailto:jason.pa...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:50 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Maurice Lawler; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console > > Maurice, > I was having the same issues, I

RE: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

This rule will reject all the ingress activities: "REJECT all -- anywhere anywherereject-with icmp-host-prohibited" You can try: iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6100 -j ACCEPT to allow console access. From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] S

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

> -Original Message- > From: Min Chen > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:15 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring > > See my comments inline. > > -min > > On

RE: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam

Congrats! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New PMC Member: Prasanna Santhanam > > Hi folks > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has >

RE: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month v/s 6 month

+1, on the automation test. When will we have good automation test? > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 7:52 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS Release 4 month

RE: running jetty with eclipse generated code?

> -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 2:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: running jetty with eclipse generated code? > > H, > > Are any people using the run target in eclipse in debug mode to run

Re: Review Request: Delete KVMHA dir contents if found when deleting templates, volumes from nfs secondary storage

write data into primary storage. - edison su On April 24, 2013, 9:23 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

RE: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption error

I can take a look at it. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from > 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption

RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM

hursday, April 25, 2013 3:37 PM > To: > Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Edison Su; Manan Shah > Subject: Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent > OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM > > I think CentOS 6.4 or Ubuntu based are OK. You can ask Manan for confirm. > > --Sheng

RE: [ACS41] new critical bug

This code will do the magic: } finally { if (!stopped) { if (!forced) { s_logger.warn("Unable to stop vm " + vm); try { stateTransitTo(vm, Event.OperationFailed, vm.getHostId()); } catch (NoTransiti

Re: Review Request: Selenium Headless configuration using PhantomJS

846/#comment41099> Hmm, you shouldn't need to modify this file any more? As the db setup is moved to utils/conf/db.properties - edison su On April 29, 2013, 11:35 p.m., Parth Jagirdar wrote: > > --- > This is an automatica

RE: [DISCUSS] UI automation using Python/Selenium

+1 on the unique names/Id, it's a life saver. The following code to find out UI element is unmaintainable: instances_table_xpath = "/html/body/div/div/div[2]/div[2]/div[2]/div/div[2]/div[2]/table/tbody/tr/td/span" > -Original Message- > From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix

Re: Review Request: Selenium Headless configuration using PhantomJS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10846/#review20009 --- Did you attache a wrong patch? - edison su On April 30, 2013, 5

Re: Review Request: Selenium Headless configuration using PhantomJS

o each unit test case: setattr(test, "base_url", "http://mgt-serv-ip-got-from-command-line:8080/";), then inside each unit test, self.base_url is already initialized. - edison su On May 1, 2013, 5:48 p.m., Parth Jagirdar wrote: > > --

Re: Review Request: Selenium Headless configuration using PhantomJS

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10846/#review20037 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On May 2, 2013, 12:08 a.m., Parth

RE: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:18 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: [ACS41] Release Blocker Update for 2013-05-08 > > Here's where we stand: > > CLOUDSTACK-2309 > Upgrade

Review Request: bug fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1907

828a827 plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/XcpServerResource.java 0ce91bc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11012/diff/ Testing --- no Thanks, edison su

[DISCUSS] include vhd-util in system vm template?

Regarding to bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2481, there is no vhd-util installed in system vm template, thus certain storage related operations failed. As discussed before, vhd-util binary is licensed under BSD and GPL(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-30),

RE: [DISCUSS] include vhd-util in system vm template?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] include vhd-util in system vm template? > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:00:57AM -

[MERGE]object_store branch into master

Hi all, Min and I worked on object_store branch during the last one and half month. We made a lot of refactor on the storage code, mostly related to secondary storage, but also on the general storage framework. The following goals are made: 1. An unified storage framework. Both secon

Apache git server is down?

Sorry, I can not work today:)

RE: Release Managers for 4.3.1 and 4.4.0

Maybe before calling out another release manager, we better sit down and talk about is there anything we can improve for the release process. Seems it's huge mount of work to do as a release manager. > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, Janua

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

Devcloud reboot issue is fixed by commit bd335d0. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 11:02 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) > > I encountered

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)

+1(binding). Following the test procedure, and test it on devcloud, it works as it is. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:52 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0

RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler

Welcome, my dear Intel friends:) Last year, community has contributed code regarding to add PCI passthrough into CloudStack, see the patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/, but unfortunately, this patch doesn't get checked in, due to lack of support from committer: http://markmail.org/messag

RE: API Calls with key value pairs (Details)

The "details" mess should be easily fixed by using POST + JSON object, such as: POST addimagestore with json content: { Key1:value1, Key2: value2 } It really takes you a while to understand what hell is " details[0].key=accesskey&details[0].value=s389ddssaa&details[1].key=secretkey&details[1]

RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler

Cc: malini.k.bhand...@intel.com; Edison Su; Dugger, Donald D; yunhong.ji...@intel.com; Meshkin, Omid; Manan Shah; Bob Ball; Hoban, Adrian Subject: RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler Dear Edison Su and Malini Bhandaru, I am the mentor of Pawit, who has submitted PCI passthrough

RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler

pci devices on the host, should agent report all of them to user/admin? If not, based on what kind of criteria to filter pci devices? > imagine it will be available in the Ubuntu 14.04 release as well, assuming > they're targeting current versions. > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:21 P

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

+1(binding), passed the test on devcloud. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > > > > > Hi All, > >

RE: Anti-patterns

That's why I move to Scala, == means what it should be:) Thanks for the sharing. > -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:41 AM > To: > Subject: Anti-patterns > > Anti-pattern: > An anti-pattern (or a

[RFC] KVM snapshot support on RHEL(6.5 <= vesion < 7)

As we discussed[1][2] before, in ACS release, by default, there is no live volume snapshot for KVM, due to starting from 6.5, qemu-img can't recognize "-s", which used by CloudStack to backup snapshot. One possible solution, to bring the function back, is to build a separate qemu-img rpm from 6.

RE: [QUESTION] Review Board

Won't this work for you? http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/reviews/reviewing-diffs/ Click "view diffs", then click on the left side of changes of code, then add your comments. Remember to click publish, after finishing review. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

ranch, git complains that some files are not indexed. - edison su On March 12, 2014, 4:09 p.m., punith s wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.a

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

can check it into master. Thanks for your patches. - edison su On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m., punith s wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

RE: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

ndors can implement whatever functionalities they want. My criteria to check in the code is very simple: the plugin should not modify common code. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:25 PM To: Edison Su; Mike Tutkowski Cc: punith s; cloud

[REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

One comment on the "/v1.0" url hack, seems changing mgt server is unavoidable, would it be easier to add a new api in cloudstack, which can get the endpoint of swift server and the auth? And the UI change should be put under ui plugin: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+P

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

13, 2014 5:52 PM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us) Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service What are you referring to as the 'v1.0 url hack'? Bypassing the cloudstack management server is an intentional design decision to

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

Hi Nux, Could you post security group log file on your 4.3 kvm host? The file is @/var/log/cloudstack/agent/security_group.log > -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:06 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:19 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 14.03.2014 19:14, Edison Su wrote: > > Hi Nux, > >

RE: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service

[mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:16 PM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; David Nalley (da...@gnsa.us) Subject: Re: [REVIEW] OpenStack Swift as Object Storage Service Lets say that we have the following setup to help clarify how

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

t;") ;print $3}'""" % (brfw, brfw)).strip() > -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:13 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 14.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

FORWARD -i cloudbr0 -j DROP Animesh, could you cherry-pick it into 4.3? > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:15 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round) > > On 14.03.2014 21:57, Edison Su wrote: > > Add a fix: e5c391fcf3852

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (eighth round)

I added another commit: d4fdc184fe9c6717d2ed4e4fe4c39d9759a90608, which will fix a race condition during security group programming. It's sort of a timing issue, the behavior will look like this: 1. add a security group rule, but the rule is not send to hypervisor 2. add a new rule, only the 1st r

FW: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

[mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 10:41 PM To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su Subject: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above. hi guys, thanks for accepting my patch before 4.4 feature freeze, and i was just curious to know when my plugin will be pushed to 4.4 and

RE: cloudbyte storage plugin for cloudstack 4.4 and above.

I checked the patch into master branch already, if no objection, I'll merge it into 4.4 at the end of today. > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:08 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: F

Re: Review Request 19021: Cloudbyte Elastistor storage plug-in

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37582 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 13, 2014, 9:16 a.m

<    1   2   3   4   >