RE: [ACS42] Feature Freeze reminder

Nice! Thanks for your great work, now we will have first primary storage plugin in 4.2. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Feature Freeze reminder >

Re: Review Request 11992: CLOUDSTACK-2571 ZWPS issues with Enabling/Clearing the Maintenance State of the Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11992/#review22613 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On June 28, 2013, 9:18 a.m

Re: Review Request 12158: CLOUDSTACK-3089-[ZWPS]-NPE-while-cancelling-the-Storage-Maintenance

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12158/#review22675 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On June 28, 2013, 9:23 a.m

RE: Coding Convention Reminder

We'd better export the code template from Eclipse, then everybody can import the template into their IDE, then possible, everybody will have the same configuration. > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:11 PM > To: dev@clo

RE: How do I Turn Off SecondaryStorageVM Creation

SecondaryStorageVM is independent from NFS. The secondary storage vm is used to download template/ISO, backup snapshot from primary storage to S3 etc. Do you have a problem to start ssvm? AFAIK, system vm template is stored in S3 automatically after mgt server is up, then during ssvm startcommand

RE: Problems with using the TemplateObjectTO's checksum

> -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 1:44 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Problems with using the TemplateObjectTO's checksum > > I'm trying to improve the performance of CopyCommand when copying a >

Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will take some effort

RE: How do I Turn Off SecondaryStorageVM Creation

ix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:21 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: How do I Turn Off SecondaryStorageVM Creation > > SSVM starts, but the image doesn't appear to be Hyper-V compatible. Runs > at 12% CPU, and I never see the console :( > &

RE: Query String Request Authentication(QSRA) support by S3 providers

Hi Thomas, as Min will OOO in the next week, would you mind to pick up some bugs related to S3?:) > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 5:23 PM > To: Thomas O'Dowd > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang > Subject: Re: Qu

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:40 AM > To: > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 20

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM > To: ; Edison Su > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley w

RE: AWS SDK version for object store

>From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to adapt >to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to upgrade >to latest SDK? > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM >

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some > questions. > =) > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:49:52PM +0530, Pras

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

were no code > changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > > > Thanks > > /Sudha > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM > > To: &#x

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

anybody wants it to be supported > > in 4.2? > > > > Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were no > > code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > > > Thanks > > /Sudha > > > > -Original

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

gt; We should support whatever is supported earlier at minimum. The problem is we don't know what is "whatever is supported", as this feature is not been tested for years, is anybody knows its status on 4.0, 4.1? > > -----Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

r version of Citrix release. There were no code > changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized. > > > > Thanks > > /Sudha > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 08

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

The simulator issue should be fixed on 4.2 branch. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some > questions. > =) >

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

.createHostAndAgent(Resource > ManagerImpl.java:1814) > at > com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHostsFull(ResourceMan > agerImpl.java:824) > at > com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManager > Impl.java:621) > at > com.cloud.agent.manager.M

RE: Using the ACS simulator for jclouds "live" tests - some questions. =)

Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:44:26AM +, Edison Su wrote: > > The simulator issue should be fixed on 4.2 branch. > > Do you mind pulling those changes into master? Done.

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

re? > release, test it and lodge defects or request help to regression test it. We > have a maintenance release cycle through which we can address these types > of defects. As I stated previously, existing feature defects are not a > justification to remove that feature. > > Thanks

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:00 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Tue, Ju

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 1:26 PM > To: Edison Su > Cc: > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:15:19P

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:22 AM > To: Edison Su > Cc: > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:12:22P

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

-John > > [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> Sen

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> > > Swift does not support S3 multi-part uploads [1] which CloudStack must use > in order to store files larger than 5 GB. Therefore, using the Swift's S3 > compatibility layer is not a viable workaround. > > > > Thanks, > > -John > > > > [1]:

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

the single call model used by Swift. Seems swift client can support upload files more than 5GB: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Swift_Upload_Large_File Ok, so we should just re-implement/fix the existing swift driver. > > Thanks, > -John > > On Jul 9, 2013, at

RE: SimulatorSecondaryDiscoverer bean

We should move all the simulator related classes into client/tomcatconf/simulatorComponentContext.xml.in Let me fix it, thanks for your report. > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

we want to support a feature, we should test it for each release. If so, who will want to test this feature? > -Original Message- > From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 8:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subject

Re: Review Request 12227: NPE while deploying any instances in kvm/vmware using ZWPS due to capacityIops

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22981 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m

Re: Review Request 11984: Fix primary datastore NPE/incorrect db entry/exception propagation for KVM on cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/#review22980 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

ll OpenStack (including > Swift) environment locally in an hour or two (dependent on Internet > connection speeds). Oh man, my two hours are wasted on devstack already. After installed devstack, there is no swift service at all. > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: >

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

ginal Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:53 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: 'Caleb Call' > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > > > > -Origi

RE: Expanding a volume on a SAN

; > > > > steps you > > > > > referred me to? > > > > > > > > > > > > When the storage is brought out of maintenance mode, will it > > > > > > see the new size or is there something more that has to be >

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

; > > supported in > > 4.2? > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Chip Childers < > > chip.child...@sungard.com> > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul

RE: Specifying Storage Provider for Primary Storage Creation/Registration

Definitely, we need to fire a bug for UI to show up all the storage plugins, when adding primary storage. Could you help to fire a bug, or fix it?:) > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:49 PM > To: dev@cloudsta

RE: NULL entry in folder colum in volumes table

It's changed to use the "path" only. > -Original Message- > From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:27 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: NULL entry in folder colum in volumes table > > Hi, > > I have noticed a change in the "v

Re: Review Request 12521: Include vmware in hypervisor list for volume resize support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12521/#review23106 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 12, 2013, 9:02 p.m

Re: Review Request 12348: Fix for NPE when listing eligible primary storage pools for volume migration across primary storages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12348/#review23107 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 9, 2013, 10:15 p.m

RE: Compilation failed in 4.2

I fixed it on my local branch already, let me check it in. > -Original Message- > From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:08 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Compilation failed in 4.2 > > Compilation failed in 4.2 , so

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:50 AM > To: ; Edison Su > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM, John Bu

RE: Compilation failed in 4.2

Should be fixed. > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Compilation failed in 4.2 > > I fixed it on my local branch already, let me check it in. > &

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

forget Apache jclouds - we've got a robust Swift interface: > http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/quickstart/openstack/ > > A. > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > >

RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?

The 4.1 swift does support >5GB upload, AFAIK, as it uses python swift client, which can support that. So I'll reuse whatever code we have in 4.1. From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 8:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Edison Su Subject: Re:

How to fix libvirt storage pool refresh issue?

There is a serious issue on KVM(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2729): a libvirt storage pool can disappear on KVM host, it's easy to be reproduced in our internal QA environment. Wei found the root cause, is on the libvirt: " This is a libvirt issue. I created a ticket for it.

Another KVM blocker issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725

If you have other KVM environment, other than RHEL 6.3, could you help to investigate bug 2725? I can easily reproduce the issue with the following steps: 1. create a vm with multiple data disks 2. detach one of data disk 3. attach the same data disk with the same device id, then this issue will b

RE: Another KVM blocker issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2725

, please run "modprobe acpiphp", and try again > > -Wei > 2013/7/16 Marcus Sorensen > > > I'll try to track it down tonight. As far as anyone knows this is 4.2 > > specific? > > On Jul 15, 2013 7:02 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: > > > >

Yet anther KVM blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3538

Due to bug fix for CLOUDSTACK-2823, we added a fix in the KVM code, to retry passCmdLine several times during system vm start. Somehow, during the retry, passCmdLine(the patchviasocket.pl itself) is hanging forever, thus blocking startcommand, even the vm is already started. The possible fix:

RE: Yet anther KVM blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3538

> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Yet anther KVM blocker: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3538 > > I am wondering what causes passCmdLine hanging forever? > > -Wei > > > 2013/7/16 Edison Su > > > Due to bug fix for CLO

Re: Review Request 12591: CLOUDSTACK-3566 Not able to create snapshot for KVM host -- backup snapshot fails

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12591/#review23222 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 16, 2013, 10:37 p.m

Re: Review Request 12702: Fix CopyCmdAnswer returned by backupSnapshotCommand for VMware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12702/#review23407 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 18, 2013, 4:29 a.m

RE: Why are these code in utils?

For s3/swift, both secondary storage code and storage plugin will access S3/Swift library. What you suggestion to put these library? > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:02 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: W

Re: Review Request 12712: Add a new snapshot flag in cloudstack for KVM 6.3 and verify it during the upgrade

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12712/#review23548 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 17, 2013, 10:34 p.m

Another way to save your build time

If you already know how to enable hostswap with jetty + maven + eclipse/intellij, please ignore. There are two links: https://gist.github.com/naaman/1053217 http://www.clickonchris.com/2010/05/configuring-jetty-maven-and-eclipse-together-with-hot-deploy/ If you follow their steps, test and develop

RE: Tracing registerTemplate API, is it possible to connect Eclipse debugger to System VMs?

Yah, you need Eclipse connects to the java agent running on SSVM. You can use the following steps: 1. login into ssvm, either console proxy or ssh(port 3922) 2. kill all the processes named as(run.sh/_run.sh, and java) 3. cd /usr/local/cloud/systemvm 4. add the " -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_soc

RE: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:06 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su; Min Chen > Subject: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features > > All, > > I have n

RE: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features

e issue yet. Should be able to upgrade from existing S3/Swift into 4.2, but I doubt are there any users are using S3/Swift in CloudStack? We'd better put our energy on how to upgrade existing NFS secondary storage to S3/Swift, which are the most users of CloudStack using. > > Thanks,

[ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3861 [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3862 [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3860 On Jul 25, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Edison Su mailto:edison...@citrix.com>> wrote: -Original Message- From: John Bur

Re: Review Request 13003: Adding packaging support for RHEL 5 and 6.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13003/#review24167 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 28, 2013, 1:14 a.m

Re: Review Request 12912: Fix for packaging defect CLOUDSTACK-2133

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12912/#review24168 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 29, 2013, 6:19 p.m

RE: blocker bug Vm deployment is failing

It's fixed. > -Original Message- > From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: blocker bug Vm deployment is failing > > Hi > I filed a blocker bug > Vm deployment is failing on build CloudPlatfor

Re: Review Request 13004: Bug:advance zone, create public Network with vlan id specified, but the portgroup is cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 not cloud.public.[vlanid].0.1-vSwitch0

: return new URI(scheme + "://" + value.toString());, thus can't apply your patch. Could you tell me which branch are you using? The master? - edison su On July 30, 2013, 12:58 a.m., Jijun wrote: > > --- > This is an

Re: Review Request 13088: CLOUDSTACK-3959: [KVM] agent setup failed when physical interface name is in pXpY format

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13088/#review24299 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 30, 2013, 10:18 p.m

Re: Review Request 13004: Bug:advance zone, create public Network with vlan id specified, but the portgroup is cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 not cloud.public.[vlanid].0.1-vSwitch0

> On July 30, 2013, 11:13 p.m., edison su wrote: > > I looked at latest 4.2 code, toURI() only contains one line code: return > > new URI(scheme + "://" + value.toString());, thus can't apply your patch. > > Could you tell me which branch are you using? Th

FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will

RE: How to fix libvirt storage pool refresh issue?

ty update, since that's also kind of I/O intensive for larger storage > arrays. > > > > However, we should make sure we have a GOOD comment in the code > about > > this "fix", since that's the reason I initially removed the old code > > which invoked &qu

Re: Review Request 12958: Automation test failure: can't attach volume to a stopped created VM. Fix the null pointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12958/#review24494 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On July 31, 2013, 10:10 p.m

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

delete(); } It's simpler version of lockfile: https://github.com/spearce/jgit/blob/master/org.eclipse.jgit/src/org/eclipse/jgit/storage/file/LockFile.java - edison su On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:03 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: > > --- > This

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

ust if (lockFile.createNewFile()) is good enough? - edison su On Aug. 5, 2013, 10:38 a.m., Wei Zhou wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24657 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

tps://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#comment48754> why not just use "select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id"? - edison su On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:07 a.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: > > --- >

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

> On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:17 p.m., edison su wrote: > > engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java, line 77 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/1/?file=334435#file334435line77> > > > > why not just use "select s.scope from sto

RE: Is the simulator broken?

Can you try: mvn -P developer,systemvm,simulator -D nonoss,simulator clean install > -Original Message- > From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:46 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is the simulator broken? > > Yeah complied with: >

RE: KVM always defaulting to QCOW2 image formats

l] > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 8:46 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: KVM always defaulting to QCOW2 image formats > > Hi, > > I just encountered CLOUDSTACK-4114 [0] during my tests. > > I didn't encounter this before, but I ju

Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24736 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m

RE: Is the simulator broken?

imulator broken? > > Eventually got it running. > Still hangs during marvin.setup though. > On 6 Aug 2013 18:55, "Edison Su" wrote: > > > Can you try: mvn -P developer,systemvm,simulator -D nonoss,simulator > > clean install > > > > > > >

RE: Is the simulator broken?

ect: RE: Is the simulator broken? > > Cool. Will try it again tomorrow. > Did Marvin.setup run for you? > On 6 Aug 2013 21:32, "Edison Su" wrote: > > > Checked in a small fix: fe9f02c372be0f3b8e755afaea1fdb60d460fcbb on > > 4.2 branch, simulator works for me n

RE: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: shadow...@gmail.com > Subject: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations > > Hi, > > In our production setups we have seen some cra

[DISCUSS] KVM HA

There is long time issue related to KVM HA, see bug: CLOUDSTACK-3535. Basically, HA won't be triggered, if KVM agent is stopped either normally nor abnormally, HA only be triggered if the network between mgt server and kvm host is disconnected and the network between KVM hosts in the same cluste

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

ries. > > From this it seems like a clean stop of the KVM agent still shouldn't trigger > any issues/HA, correct? Yes, a clean stop wont' trigger HA. "reboot -f" or plug off power supply will trigger HA. > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Edison Su wrote: >

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

KVM agent still shouldn't > > trigger any issues/HA, correct? > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Edison Su wrote: > >> There is long time issue related to KVM HA, see bug: CLOUDSTACK-3535. > Basically, HA won't be triggered, if KVM agent is stopp

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

gt;>> [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment > >>> failed > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Key: CLOUDSTACK-2729 > >>>

[DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: >From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is >KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the >same

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:41 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling > > > > On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: > > Hi All, &g

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

ve admin the way to change the io speed. > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 11:27 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling > > > > > -Original M

Re: Review Request 13460: VPC test case TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disabl, since its failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/#review24962 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 10, 2013, 12:53 a.m

RE: snapshots in kvm

> -Original Message- > From: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: snapshots in kvm > > Hi Sanjeev, > > As I understand it from a cloudstack prospective it will work per disk. > This error is r

[ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456

Need to apply a0de0d0177a9251756d57ebdbea93f51a597ac1f and d157e2970ebd6d8d4c5a98a6d2adbc5da013f59b on 4.2 During the automation test, sometimes, KVM can't find volume, so add the code to look up volume for a few times(refresh storage pool).

[ACS42] Cherry pick commit 17ffe48ad2d78a9e145ada915ae40fa6792943f4

Hi Animesh, There is a bug related to concurrent xenserver snapshot, currently, we don't support take concurrent snapshot on one volume, so need to disable it. Previously, A volume state machine is used to prevent concurrent snapshot, but it's not enough, so acquire a table lock on snapshot

[ACS4.2] Don;t use libvirt 0.10.2+ if you are using NFS as primary storage on KVM

There is a "bug" in libvirt 0.10.2+: /* Short-circuit if already mounted */ 385 if ((rc = virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted(pool)) != 0) { 386

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

heads/4.2 > > Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f > > > > I notice Edison's fix is missing although it is on 4.2. Is this intended? It's optional, my mistake to check it into 4.2 branch. > > commit 58786079706c85e3b0f331301e81fa560edb

[ACS42]Cherry pick cfe3a0fee39379c4ab1fdad9150924b9e46becd6

As the file lock between kvm hosts are removed, then the data inconsistence between kvm hosts occurred: create one volume from one host, but not shown up on another kvm host. It can be caused by nfs cache(I already ask Rayees to add "noactimo=0" in /etc/nfsmount.conf , then try again) and change

RE: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment

Sounds related to bug 21cb33a02ce2ff1e1b22af275068451a3ab6add5 > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:01 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment > > Hi, > > I've tried

RE: simulator in master borked?

It's working in 4.2. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:14 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: simulator in master borked? > > I've been working around some issues, but no luck. Primarily the stor

[ACS42] Cheery pick 6b4aed2acacb1663cfd3955cc64bc84adef402bc

Fix KVM HA issue.

RE: ComponentContext.inject() usage in storage framework

There are cases, the object is not singleton, such as VolumeObject, but it needs to access DAO, then either we need to pass the DAOs in the VolumeObject's constructor, or through ComponentContext.inject(), or using AspectJ's @Configurable(http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.1.x/spring-f

[ACS42] KVM upgrade path to 4.2

There is a bug related to KVM upgrade: CLOUDSTACK-4405. The main issue is related to guest network bridge name schema is changed, thus migrate vm, create new vm will have problem after upgraded to 4.2. If you are using basic network, then don't need to do the following steps. The proposed upgrade

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (third round)

Xcp and devcloud are using different code, so the issue shouldn't exist on xcp. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Chip Childers Sent: ‎8/‎30/‎2013 6:57 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review25939 --- Thanks for your fix on iptables, patch is OK for me. - edison su

Re: Review Request 13877: CIFS Secondary Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13877/#review25940 --- Ok for me. - edison su On Aug. 28, 2013, 8:58 p.m., Donal

<    1   2   3   4   >