Hello, Devs. I have a fresh 4.11.1 RC with two KVM hosts deployed.
First, I unable to deploy instances with UserDispersingPlanner planner. The
errors look like:
2018-05-30 16:31:35,372 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(qtp1856056345-27:ctx-3fb8db1f ctx-d8415fd2) (logid:dbe8f2ce) ===END===
91.221.61.126 -
Daan, sorry. It seems I wiped it. That day's logs start with shiny new 4.11
working.
2018-05-29 19:02 GMT+07:00 Daan :
> Did you get that piece of log, yet Ivan?
>
> On 2018/05/28 12:50:09, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > Ivan can you share the log bit during startup where it tries to run the
> > 41000
To be more precise, I see that error only under "admin" user. Users from
domains can create VMS with anti-affinity groups fine.
2018-05-30 16:38 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev :
> Hello, Devs. I have a fresh 4.11.1 RC with two KVM hosts deployed.
>
> First, I unable to deploy instances with UserDispe
Sorry for spamming your e-mails, I finally have got the exact behavior:
If
VM host tags set AND (OR) VM UerDispersingPlanner set
then not able to deploy vm
Anti-affinity works fine (if first two are not set).
2018-05-30 17:18 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev :
> To be more precise, I see that err
Hi Ivan,
Host tags are an absolute requirement – so if host tag matching can not be met
due to affinity or planner then the VMs won’t start.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 30/05/2018, 11:33, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" wrote:
Sorry for spamming your e-mails, I finally have got
Hi, Dag. Thank you very much, I really know that
What I have in my cloud:
Two local storage KVM hosts:
Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU
Storage tags: PERMIT
I have service offering with tags:
Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU
Storage tags: PERMIT
I don't have hosts without that labels at all, but, VM doesn't
Thanks!
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sean Lair wrote:
> No problem!
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/2680
>
> Also, create a possible Pull Request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2681
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Weingärtner [mailto:rafael
Hi Ivan,
OK – understand – if those are the tags used then IMO it should work, and yes
agree, userdisperseplanning should’t kick in with 0 VMs.
Could the issue be with tagging rather than userdispersing:
>> (logid:5ee25964) The clusterId list for the given offering tag: []
This looks like i
Hello, Dag, no, I have a single enabled cluster with enabled hosts, where
vms are deployed just fine from service offerings without host tags and
without UserDispersingPlanner, but with storage tags (since I have local
storage). But if I use a service offering with host tags which match host
tags e
