Hi Ivan,
Host tags are an absolute requirement – so if host tag matching can not be met
due to affinity or planner then the VMs won’t start.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 30/05/2018, 11:33, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote:
Sorry for spamming your e-mails, I finally have got the exact behavior:
If
VM host tags set AND (OR) VM UerDispersingPlanner set
then not able to deploy vm
Anti-affinity works fine (if first two are not set).
2018-05-30 17:18 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>:
> To be more precise, I see that error only under "admin" user. Users from
> domains can create VMS with anti-affinity groups fine.
>
> 2018-05-30 16:38 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>:
>
>> Hello, Devs. I have a fresh 4.11.1 RC with two KVM hosts deployed.
>>
>> First, I unable to deploy instances with UserDispersingPlanner planner.
>> The errors look like:
>>
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,372 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
>> (qtp1856056345-27:ctx-3fb8db1f ctx-d8415fd2) (logid:dbe8f2ce) ===END===
>> 91.221.61.126 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachine&r
>> esponse=json&zoneid=d477bb3f-3592-4503-8f2a-da3d878dd476&tem
>> plateid=369815dc-0622-4645-8ca4-c6432baebe89&hypervisor=KVM&
>> serviceofferingid=eab6a6fa-ae7d-4e39-9ddf-32285cdfd20b&
>> affinitygroupids=c2ca0ddf-9e87-4d7c-9e91-3f6eb56f30f4&
>> securitygroupids=c1ec899c-c69b-11e7-bdcf-0242ac110004&
>> displayname=aaa4&name=aaa4&_=1527672695121
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1,
>> pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 9000, requested ram: 12884901888
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,460 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.HostAntiAffinityProcessor]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Processing affinity group test for VM Id: 2149
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,473 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: []
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,474 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,476 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, that
have
>> (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this Zone: 1
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,479 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters from
avoid
>> set: []
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) The clusterId list for the given offering tag: []
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters and
>> clusters in avoid list, returning.
>> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,490 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl]
>> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab)
>> (logid:5ee25964) Destroying vm VM[User|i-2-2149-VM] as it failed to
create
>> on Host with Id:null
>>
>> It's not in the "deployment.planners.exclude" btw.
>>
>> I removed from offerings that attribute:
>> update service_offering_view set deployment_planner = null;
>>
>> and they can be deployed right now.
>>
>>
>> Second, VMs with anti-affinity also won't deploy:
>>
>> The message is exactly the same by meaning.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
>> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
>> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
>> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>
>
--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
