Hi, Dag. Thank you very much, I really know that What I have in my cloud:
Two local storage KVM hosts: Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU Storage tags: PERMIT I have service offering with tags: Host tags: PERMIT,HIGHCPU Storage tags: PERMIT I don't have hosts without that labels at all, but, VM doesn't deploy even if no anti-affinity is set, so no constraints should be breached. Also, I don't catch how UserDispersingPlanner may interfere, if I have 0 VMs deployed. It worked just fine in previous releases (at least 4.10, 4.9.3, 4.3). But now, in 4.11.1 RC it doesn't. 2018-05-30 17:36 GMT+07:00 Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>: > Hi Ivan, > > Host tags are an absolute requirement – so if host tag matching can not be > met due to affinity or planner then the VMs won’t start. > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 30/05/2018, 11:33, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote: > > Sorry for spamming your e-mails, I finally have got the exact behavior: > > If > VM host tags set AND (OR) VM UerDispersingPlanner set > then not able to deploy vm > > Anti-affinity works fine (if first two are not set). > > > > 2018-05-30 17:18 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com > >: > > > To be more precise, I see that error only under "admin" user. Users > from > > domains can create VMS with anti-affinity groups fine. > > > > 2018-05-30 16:38 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev < > kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>: > > > >> Hello, Devs. I have a fresh 4.11.1 RC with two KVM hosts deployed. > >> > >> First, I unable to deploy instances with UserDispersingPlanner > planner. > >> The errors look like: > >> > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,372 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] > >> (qtp1856056345-27:ctx-3fb8db1f ctx-d8415fd2) (logid:dbe8f2ce) > ===END=== > >> 91.221.61.126 -- GET command=deployVirtualMachine&r > >> esponse=json&zoneid=d477bb3f-3592-4503-8f2a-da3d878dd476&tem > >> plateid=369815dc-0622-4645-8ca4-c6432baebe89&hypervisor=KVM& > >> serviceofferingid=eab6a6fa-ae7d-4e39-9ddf-32285cdfd20b& > >> affinitygroupids=c2ca0ddf-9e87-4d7c-9e91-3f6eb56f30f4& > >> securitygroupids=c1ec899c-c69b-11e7-bdcf-0242ac110004& > >> displayname=aaa4&name=aaa4&_=1527672695121 > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from > dc:1, > >> pod:null,cluster:null, requested cpu: 9000, requested ram: > 12884901888 > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,456 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Is ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: No > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,460 DEBUG [o.a.c.a.HostAntiAffinityProcessor] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Processing affinity group test for VM Id: 2149 > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,473 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: [] > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,474 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Searching all possible resources under this Zone: 1 > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,476 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Listing clusters in order of aggregate capacity, > that have > >> (atleast one host with) enough CPU and RAM capacity under this > Zone: 1 > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,479 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Removing from the clusterId list these clusters > from avoid > >> set: [] > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) The clusterId list for the given offering tag: [] > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,486 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) No clusters found after removing disabled clusters > and > >> clusters in avoid list, returning. > >> 2018-05-30 16:31:35,490 DEBUG [c.c.v.UserVmManagerImpl] > >> (API-Job-Executor-10:ctx-b36a77ea job-156334 ctx-9c358aab) > >> (logid:5ee25964) Destroying vm VM[User|i-2-2149-VM] as it failed to > create > >> on Host with Id:null > >> > >> It's not in the "deployment.planners.exclude" btw. > >> > >> I removed from offerings that attribute: > >> update service_offering_view set deployment_planner = null; > >> > >> and they can be deployed right now. > >> > >> > >> Second, VMs with anti-affinity also won't deploy: > >> > >> The message is exactly the same by meaning. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd. > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > > Bitworks Software, Ltd. > > Cell: +7-923-414-1515 > > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > > > > > > -- > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > Bitworks Software, Ltd. > Cell: +7-923-414-1515 > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev Bitworks Software, Ltd. Cell: +7-923-414-1515 WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
