Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner
The CPU.Reservation value by **default** is 0, Also the value is set in
VMware not from the ACS UI.
this gives ambiguity about the CPU allocated and Utilised.
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1965
@bvbharatk Yes, you might know only the vm has sshkey attached will have
the password in vm details. If the vm does not have ssh keypair, then the vm
password will not saved into user_vm_det
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
@rashmidixit We have ported it in our branch and found it inconvenient to
click the OK button in dialog with warning "No more hosts are available for
migration" frequently.
could yo
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@serg38 and @borisstoyanov Thanks for giving your precious time.
@sadhugit is looking for test cases related suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
GitHub user sudhansu7 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
CLOUDSTACK-9831: Previous pod_id still remains in the vm_instance table
Previous pod_id still remains in the vm_instance table after VM migration
with migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1740
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 461
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=105
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-590
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-589
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-65u1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@borisstoyanov unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os
are: `centos6, centos7, ubuntu`. Supported hypervisors are: `kvm-centos6,
kvm-centos7, kvm-ubuntu, xenserver-65sp1,
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
@karuturi 3 x LGTM, testing successful. Ready for Merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1983
Closing since another similar PR has been merged now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@mike-tutkowski awesome, thanks for testing this PR!
@rafaelweingartner thanks for reviewing, I'll work on changes proposed
@karuturi sure, I'll work on it, thanks!
---
If you
The proposal seems interesting, I do not know why it was closed in the
first place.
Ticket reopened; now you just need to discuss and code the proposal ;)
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jan-Arve Nygård
wrote:
> My Jira username is thinktwo, but i'm not a developer so it's probably
> better if
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878#discussion_r105679910
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -216,6 +216,20 @@ public void t
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878#discussion_r105677642
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -2072,6 +2121,17 @@ protected StartA
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878#discussion_r105676576
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/vm/dao/NicDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -302,4 +309,17 @@ public int countNicsForStartingVms(long networkId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878#discussion_r105678507
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java
---
@@ -1928,6 +1929,54 @@ protected StartA
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@jayakarteek thanks for the explanation
I thought that ACS would configure those parameters automatically. The way
you described it feels like ACS is not limiting the use of CPU for
We still have below three blockers open. I will create RC once
they are fixed.
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 9, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
wrote:
We currently have the below list of blockers:
BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
CLOUDSTACK-9
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1958
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/847
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1967
@bvbharat can you start internal CI and post results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
1866 - failed BVT results(may not be related. But, needs to be
checked. Also, jenkins and travis failed)
1967 - no test results
rest merged.
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 4, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Haijiao (18602198...@163.com) wrote:
Github user sureshanaparti commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105722036
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1049,7 +1044,13 @@ public boolean executeUserRequest(fina
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1968
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 462
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105723986
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void pullAgentOutMaintenance
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105723252
--- Diff: api/src/com/cloud/resource/ResourceService.java ---
@@ -50,7 +52,7 @@
Host cancelMaintenance(CancelMaintenanceCmd cmd);
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105723444
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/host/ReconnectHostCmd.java ---
@@ -100,17 +103,18 @@ public Long getInstanceId() {
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2002
@sudhansu7 Shouldn't we update POD id upon a successful migration? If
migration fails we will have wrong POD id in the DB.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105724153
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
---
@@ -512,7 +512,11 @@ public void
doInTra
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105723834
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -986,33 +986,28 @@ public Answer easySend(final Long ho
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r105725769
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
dataCenterId
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878
@rafaelweingartner Thanks for reviewing, will work on the changes suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Hi Guys,
Thanks to Will Stevens we’ve managed to identify that the changes in cs_ip.py
introduced in StrongSwan development were causing this blocker. I guess it
managed to slip in, since it appears only on physical KVM hosts.
I’ve reverted back to the state of cs_ip.py before the changes and w
I will open a PR to update the offending line of code to be more defensive
so it won't error. We can't revert that change because it will
re-introduce a bug which causes the source nat IP to not be the primary IP
on the nic after a VR reboot.
I will open a PR to fix this right now so you can test
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
fixed an issue if the dev is not in the databag
Defend against the specified dev not being in the databag.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https:
Boris, please test this PR in your environment:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Thanks,
*Will Stevens*
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I will open a PR to update the offending line of code to be more defensive
> so it won't error. We can't revert that c
I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client was
incorporated by midonet-cluster (
https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster).
So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it might be a good idea to
upgrade the dependency. Moreover, I start to qu
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Thanks for this fix @swill
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1859
It has already two LGTMs and contains all successful test results. This is
a big change, as time passes there are more chances of conflicts
appearance(Already resolved once). If anyone wa
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1859
@nitin-maharana I was looking at the PR.
Do you need to split everything thing there in a different commit?
I think that we still do not have a clear understanding when and how t
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-591
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
@rafaelweingartner I pushed changes and squashed my commits as it could be
easier to review. I also added unit tests for new methods
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105796076
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1759
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 463
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105796786
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105796872
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +90,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r105797159
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl.java
---
@@ -409,15 +460,13 @@ public StoragePoolVO per
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
Trillian test result (tid-952)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 45011 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@jayakarteek @rafaelweingartner what about retrieving CPU performance
metric for usage using
[PerfomanceManager](https://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-60/index.jsp#com.vmware.wssdk.apiref.doc/vim.Per
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
Trillian test result (tid-953)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 45570 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
This seems to be a great idea @nvazquez.
What do you think @jayakarteek ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
Hi @rafaelweingartner @anshul1886 @GabrielBrascher,
I've read this PR's comments several times and I think I could understand
@anshul1886's point. Please correct me if I'm wrong. The executi
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Thanks Will. Can you please add bug id(CLOUDSTACK-9811) to the PR and
commit message?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1859
@rafaelweingartner : As there are multiple contributors to this feature, If
I squash it to one commit, then others are going to lose their part of
contributions. Initially, we thought of
Github user cloudsadhu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@serg38 - thanks for your comment- I have added nfs support
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
You(shanika) should have access to the edit the wiki now.
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On March 12, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Shanika Ediriweera
(shanika...@cse.mrt.ac.lk) wrote:
Thank you.
Should I drop another mail saying I am interested in the above
mentioned
project
Best
I apologize for the delay on the response, let me clarify the points requested:
Mike asked:
"What I was curious about is if you plan to exclusively build your feature as a
set of scripts and/or if you plan to update the CloudStack code base, as well."
JG: My idea was to do this separately as a
Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
@jayapalu, Please see Daan's and Wido's comments on the referenced PR
#1307.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 464
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
@ustcweizhou The popup is to indicate that no hosts were found. If I remove
that, then there will be no visual indication that the search has returned no
results.
We need to have a
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1278
@nvazquez @rafaelweingartner @GabrielBrascher, That method is called from
multiple places. There are many places where we can do these kind of changes. I
would prefer to have those kind of ch
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Trillian test result (tid-954)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33186 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Hi, Karuturi
These PRs below seems ready to be merged too.
#1883, CLOUDSTACK-9723: Enable unique mac address across the zones
#1886, CLOUDSTACK-9728: Fixed traffic sentinel HTTP 414 error response
#1901, CLOUDSTACK-9405: add details parameter in listDomains API to reduce the
execution time
#1
80 matches
Mail list logo
