Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@nvazquez @serg38 From last comment looks like there is some open item
related to marvin tests. Can you please address it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Hi,
I like the idea.
Cloudrouter looks really promising, I'm not too keen on VyOS (it doesn't have a
proper http api etc).
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Will Stevens"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1671
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 92
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=1
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1671
the failed test(test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan) is not due to this PR. Its
a test case cleanup issue. This PR looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi,
Instead of replacing the VR in first place we should add VyOS/cloudrouter as
provider. Once it is stable, network offerings (on upgrade) can be updated to
use it and we can drop the VR if we want at that release onwards.
VR is stabilized over a period of time and some of them are running wi
Ya. CloudRouter is interesting because it has a native api. For that reason
it was brought up as an alternative to VyOS in our internal discussions.
On Sep 13, 2016 5:23 AM, "Nux!" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea.
>
> Cloudrouter looks really promising, I'm not too keen on VyOS (it doesn't
> ha
Ya. If we go this way, I like the approach of building the integration and
putting it through its paces as a stand alone VR before we consider
replacing the old VR and making it the default.
On Sep 13, 2016 6:52 AM, "Jayapal Uradi"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Instead of replacing the VR in first place we s
Hi all,
We're very excited to announce the Autumn 2016 meetup, in London, Thursday,
November 24 (agenda & speakers TBC):
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-27604537916
VENUE: BT Centre showcase, 81 Newgate St, London, EC1A 7AJ. Nearest tube: St.
Paul's
As we
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1671
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
Started our internal CI to run smoke tests on this PR. It will post the
results here. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
@jburwell someone else already merged ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
@koushik-das Yes, an integration test is in the works. I will post results
here in few days
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
@karuturi the point is that there is no discussion about who can commit.
It is in black and white in Section 2.3 of our bylaws and the Apache Way. As I
said in my previous comment, no one eve
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@rhtyd @jburwell @rafaelweingartner I agree with @rhtyd to move sanity
checker last_id to the DB. No reason to keep in in file system. How about using
"usage.sanity.check.lastid in configurati
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@serg38 I completely agree that it should be in the database, but it's not
a configuration setting. Furthermore, it requires a different transactional
behavior to operate properly. Therefore,
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1593
@jburwell Creating a new table to hold one setting seems to be excessive.
How about using sequence table? In this regard last_Id used by usage sanity
checker is a sequence.
---
If your project
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 93
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=1
Skipped=4
_Link to logs Folder (search
I like this idea as well. I would be willing to test both VyOS and Cloudrouter
if you need an active service to test with. Specifically I am looking to test
IPv6 since I provide IPv6 /64 spaces to my customers and I am having to provide
it via an external router at the moment which has a lot of
I would like to see a "virtual router offering" in the UI which lets you
pick the legacy VR or your own. Probably a component of the network
offering. I've had many cases were I needed Mikrotik RouterOS or pfSense to
match a clients on-premise gear. ACS should find a way to stay agnostic IMO.
On T
Hi,
SSL offload support in Cloudstack and documented here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
SSL+Termination+Support is currently only available to NetScaler LB devices.
If we try to attach a certificate to a CloudStack Virtual Router LB:
assignCertToLoadBalancer&certid=3b06
yes, technically we should be able to just make a new VR implementation
available and then when people create their network offerings, they just
pick which VR implementation they want to use for the different
capabilities.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 r
> Op 13 september 2016 om 13:33 schreef Steve Roles :
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're very excited to announce the Autumn 2016 meetup, in London, Thursday,
> November 24 (agenda & speakers TBC):
>
> https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-27604537916
>
> VENUE: BT Centr
+1 on cloudrouter. We have been looking at this as a potential
replacement/addon to our existing VRs.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> yes, technically we should be able to just make a new VR implementation
> available and then when people create their network offerings, th
I have spent all of 2 mins looking at Cloudrouter so it may do this and I
haven’t found it but according to the feature list it doesn't support VXLANS.
Am I missing it somewhere?
-Original Message-
From: Zaeem Arshad [mailto:zaeem.ars...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:4
Does CloudRouter provide VPN (site-site and client)? Looking from their
website I don't seem to find it. Also, missing is VVRP for redundancy. Has
anyone used it for this?
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Zaeem Arshad
wrote:
> +1 on cloudrouter. We have been looking at this as a potential
> rep
It does.. Its under Secure Connectivity.
-Original Message-
From: Syed Ahmed [mailto:sah...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Replacing the VR
Does CloudRouter provide VPN (site-site and client)? Looking from the
Judging from this, it does not look like IPSec is managed via the API
though:
https://cloudrouter.atlassian.net/wiki/display/CPD/Bridging+Public+Clouds+with+CloudRouter
I believe it is also missing VXLAN and VRRP, but I have not dug into it yet.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud
So it looks like we are eliminating CloudRouter. To many missing or non API
managed features.
But in reading VyOS, it also does not have a remote management API so this
would have to be a "SSH to CLI" job.
If I am not mistaken is this how it's done now?
-Original Message-
From: william
Yeah, today, the agent uses a script to inject CLI via ssh into the VR. It's
really (did I mention really) ugly.
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:05 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Replacing the VR
So it looks like
I am trying to find their api documentation to get a feel for what
cloudrouter can do via the API.
On Sep 13, 2016 1:05 PM, "Marty Godsey" wrote:
> So it looks like we are eliminating CloudRouter. To many missing or non
> API managed features.
>
> But in reading VyOS, it also does not have a rem
Yes, not pretty, but this would probably be the best option for remote
management of the vyos.
https://github.com/vyos/python-vyos-mgmt
On Sep 13, 2016 1:08 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote:
> Yeah, today, the agent uses a script to inject CLI via ssh into the VR.
> It's really (did I mention really) u
I think there are other options for the vyos, but none are elegant from
what I have seen so far.
On Sep 13, 2016 1:14 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote:
> Yes, not pretty, but this would probably be the best option for remote
> management of the vyos.
>
> https://github.com/vyos/python-vyos-mgmt
>
> On S
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the reply. I changed the logging level to dedug as per your
recommendation. Please find enclosed the link of my cloudstack-management
and cloudstack-agent respectively:
http://pastebin.com/gG1LRm0X
http://pastebin.com/zJ7CHhLD
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
Hi,
we now have a nice URL pointing to the replacement jenkins of j.bac.o:
builds.cloudstack.org
I'll make sure the enable SSL for user authentication, whoever is commiter
that want admin access to Jenkins, let me know, if you have CI system that
we could leverage via a centralized portal, feel
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
LGTM for the testing. Smoke test results
```
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for project ... === TestName:
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Status : SUCCESS ===
test D
This looks interesting to me:
1.
looking for pif for bridge virbr0
2.
2016-09-13 19:22:09,833 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(main:null) failing to get physical interface from bridge virbr0, did not find
an eth*, bond*, team*, vlan*, em*, p*p*, ens*, eno*, enp*, or enx* in
/s
Github user dcarbone commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
squashed, pointing at 4.9, and commit amended.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Since Cloudrouter has a full distro for Opendaylight would you use that for the
API? But I can't find anything about the Cloudrouter API if it does have one.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
nSource Solutions
-Original Message-
From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Beh
I can't seem to find any API documentation for CloudRouter. Maybe my
Google foo is weak. Has anyone else found any usable docs on that?
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue,
Ya, I can't find anything either. So that means that we would be working
with the API of each component, which I don't really like. It means we
don't have a single API endpoint to handle things like IPSec, etc (or even
an API at all for a lot of the functionality). :(
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Develo
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
@murali-reddy could you please investigate the cause of the Jenkins build
failure?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78638045
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
4.12
1.3
-1.46
+1.54
--- End diff --
it appears that
[1
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78638396
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -111,37 +116,37 @@ public CertServiceImpl() {
@DB
@O
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78638846
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78638892
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78639151
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78640135
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78641717
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78641993
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78642059
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78642099
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78643413
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -339,190 +348,182 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78643673
--- Diff: server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -341,179 +350,172 @@ public SslCertResponse createCertResponse(SslCert
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644423
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -125,48 +125,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertWithCAChain() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644594
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -125,48 +125,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertWithCAChain() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644684
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -200,23 +200,23 @@ public void runUploadSslCertSelfSignedWithPassword
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644729
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -200,23 +200,23 @@ public void runUploadSslCertSelfSignedWithPassword
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644844
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -245,48 +245,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertSelfSignedNoPassword()
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78644966
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -245,48 +245,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertSelfSignedNoPassword()
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645295
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -297,48 +297,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645670
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -348,90 +348,91 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645872
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -348,90 +348,91 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645990
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -348,90 +348,91 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646056
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646545
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646974
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646913
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646689
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646330
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647140
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -571,43 +573,44 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNotX509() throws
IOEx
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647190
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -571,43 +573,44 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNotX509() throws
IOEx
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78646098
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645447
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -297,48 +297,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645238
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -297,48 +297,48 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645782
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -348,90 +348,91 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647300
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -571,43 +573,44 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNotX509() throws
IOEx
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78645945
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -348,90 +348,91 @@ public void runUploadSslCertNoRootCert() throws
I
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647426
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -686,35 +689,35 @@ public void runDeleteSslCertBoundCert() throws
No
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647513
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -726,17 +729,17 @@ public void runDeleteSslCertInvalidId() throws
No
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648029
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648238
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647052
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648332
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78647094
--- Diff: server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/lb/CertServiceTest.java
---
@@ -440,129 +441,130 @@ public void runUploadSslCertBadkeyPair() throws
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648573
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648669
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78649049
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511#discussion_r78648723
--- Diff:
utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/security/CertificateHelper.java ---
@@ -38,125 +38,139 @@
import java.security.spec.InvalidKeySpecExc
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
@rhtyd this PR is actually fairly important as it upgrades our crypto
implementation to the latest available. Therefore, I want to get it into LTS
for 4.9.2.0.
In addition to addressi
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
@rhtyd @jburwell @rafaelweingartner @koushik-das The rationale to have
vmware.nested.virtualization.perVM was that advanced vm_details and template
details are user controlled. With
https://issu
This is great. Thanks for setting it up PL.
If possible, could you also move the coverity job[1] to the new
jenkins please?
CloudStack coverity report last ran on Jan 25, 2016
[1]
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-master-twiceweekly-coverity/
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.acc
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@jburwell I changed the commit and PR to point to 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Cloudrouter looks promising. These have potential to save future engineering
effort for example on ipv6 routing, OSPF etc.
And the best part is they come with test automation framework.
On 13/09/16, 4:22 PM, "Jayapal Uradi" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Instead of replacing the VR in first place we should
94 matches
Mail list logo
