[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread karuturi
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53 Merge 4.5 to master You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack merge-45-to-master-2 Alternatively you can review a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Update ConsoleProxyPasswordBasedEncryptor...

2014-12-08 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10#issuecomment-66041100 Hi Tim, IMO, the fixes are in main methods of those classes, so do they even affect CloudStack mgmt server, I'm not sure? Both the PRs cannot be acce

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66041167 Thanks Rajani for the PR, let's merge as soon as Travis passes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6212: Let vm_instance table's ...

2014-12-08 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/52 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

2014-12-08 Thread bhaisaab
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66041997 Thanks Rajani, go for it! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/ --- (Updated déc. 8, 2014, 9:31 matin) Review request for cloudstack, Anshul Gangwa

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on > > master? Thanks. done - Axel --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://re

Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?

2014-12-08 Thread France
Hi Rohit, Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in time for 4.3.2 release: Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013 Failed to create a volume from snapshot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66043331 sure Rohit.. waiting for travis to finish. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
> On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:57 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on > > master? Thanks. > > Axel Delahaye wrote: > done Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am . It fails. I will be able to merge your contribut

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread runseb
Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66044338 Hi folks, any chance to try those merges with the noawsapi branch ? I am working on IP clearance for ec2stack and gstack and once we get that under the project, I would

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on > > master? Thanks. > > Axel Delahaye wrote: > done > > Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am . > It fails. I

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/ --- (Updated déc. 8, 2014, 10:30 matin) Review request for cloudstack, Anshul Gangw

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:57 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly on > > master? Thanks. > > Axel Delahaye wrote: > done > > Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Axel - on latest master, I'm unable to apply it using git am . > It fails. I

KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi guys, still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for KVM ? We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will). Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design documents her

RE: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not support memory snapshots - I wonder wich hypervisor does it ? This option at user

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
With KVM - I understand that there are 2 steps in general. 1) libvirts save - which saves memory of running VM to a file 2) qemu-img to snapshot disks... AS for the KVM VM snapshoting - my understanding is that the code is not implemented at all, right ? On 8 December 2014 at 12:11, Vadim Kimlay

Re: Review Request 16973: Contrail Event Interceptor fix

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
I spoke to the contrail guys at openstack summit last month. It seems they have dropped their support for ACS. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https:/

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/53#issuecomment-66103841 sure @runseb. I can help with that. rebase master on noawsapi branch would required a force push. This is what I think we can do here is 1. create a new b

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7986 [F5 LB] Failed to execute...

2014-12-08 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/47#issuecomment-66104188 missed adding a link to the pr in commit message 4.3: 7d17e95991035beeb802483a4b3d98df0dc9c8e8 4.4: c8882b39ec6ba84355a70c2f59f01a422e906b31 4.5 and master:

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Wei ZHOU
As far as I know, KVM does support memory snapshot. The shortcoming is libvirt-java supports only internal snapshot (not external snapshots) for now. In this case, the memory snapshot will be attached to the qcow2 file, and the qcow2 will grow even after we remove the memory snapshot. I've changed

[ACS45] release notes

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
Pierre-Luc, I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is java 1.7 as well. -- Daan

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > CS does not support memory snapshots for XenServer. Disk snapshots are > working. Not sure about VmWare, but I guess it should be the same. I > thought the reachest feature-set is developed for KVM. But if it does not > support memory sna

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ? On 8 December 2014 at 12:43, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk < > vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee > > wrote: > > > CS does not s

[proposal] Purge Volumes instead of deleting them

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Anybody interested ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926 Best -- Andrija Panić

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
Not that I know. I take VM snaphots all the time, and don't have XS licenses. -- Erik On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless > you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ? > > On 8 Decem

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Nux!
Andrija, No, 6.2 went fully free, no more restrictions. You can do disk and/or memory snapshots as much as you want, ACS supports it. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Andrija Panic" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache

Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

2014-12-08 Thread Nux!
Hi, I'm getting more and more requests from customers to have "mini clouds" installed, but also DR capability. This would be a great occasion to introduce them to Cloudstack, except for the DR bit for which I have found no straightforward way of performing. I'd have to replicate a whole lot of

答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

2014-12-08 Thread Star Guo
Hi, I think if you make nfs as primary storage backend on brtfs or zfs (freenas?) you could take a snapshot and send all to DR site. Also, a plan of increment snapshot. This may be good method. Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 发送时间: 2014年12月8日 20:34 收件人

Re: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

2014-12-08 Thread Nux!
Thanks, but that is not my main problem. My difficulties are more like: - how do I dump metadata for cloudstack KVM guests that are not running? virsh dumpxml will not work as the guests that are not running are not defined at all in libvirt (ie this will not list them: virsh list --all) - how

Re: [ACS45] release notes

2014-12-08 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Daan, Yes, 1.7 java upgrade is from the RN of 4.4, I'll remove 4.5 RN from RTD since it's not completed yet. Sorry about that. PL On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Pierre-Luc, > > I see you mentioned an upgrade to java 1.7 as new in 4.5. 4.4 is java > 1.7 as well. > >

[ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out that in the update procedure the flag VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for versions 4.4.0-4.4.2 I have no workaround other then rebooting the routers instead of upgading/updating them. I will patch the branch

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess? -- Erik On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, I investigated an issue some colleagues noticed and it turns out > that in the update procedure the flag > VirtualNetworkApplianceService.MinVRVersion is not set for ver

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
I am looking if the value 4.4.1 is applicable there or whether it should be higher, as we mail. will update you all. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > This should probably happen in 4.5 branch as well I guess? > > -- > Erik > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Daan Hoogland > wr

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such as ACS 4.4.x, this value should be 4.4.0 unless we want to use higher templates such as 4.4.1 or 4.4.2. For 4.5, it should be 4.5.0. This is assuming that ACS templates are compatible with future bugfix releases and we don't

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the systemvm64template dir mostly. I think the 32bit one is no longer supported, really. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM, wrote: > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master f73ad2e8b -> ca5c800f8 > > > Fix CloudStack version (4.6.0) in systemv

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in MinVRVersion in 4.4! On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > In 4.3 it's defined as _minVRVersion. For each major ACS version such as ACS > 4.4.x, this val

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade procedure if it is not needed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rohit, in 4.4 there was a problem with the templates in 4.4.0 so it > must be 4.4.1. I don't see the underscore but a capital M in > MinVRVersio

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
I see some changes that make me want to put 4.5.0 in there for the 4.5 branch. proceding On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Also I don't think we need to let users go through a sysvm upgrade > procedure if it is not needed. > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wr

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
few question about 4.5; - which systemvm should we use? jenkins job build-systemvm-4.5 is a month old. - upgrade path seams damaged, previous bug CLOUDSTACK-8041 is false, although I've never succeed to upgrade a system so far. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > The up

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Will Stevens
We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a compatibility issues. This merge should be made asap... Cheers, *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy

答复: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

2014-12-08 Thread Star Guo
I think if all the cloudstack network is behind a firewall ( a device setting DNAT+SNAT ) it may be easy to achieve the goal of DR. Make all CS management (mysql) as a KVM instance which start with virsh, and backend btrfs, and make primary storage and secondary storage backend of other subvolu

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

2014-12-08 Thread Wei ZHOU
Daan, system64template dir does not exist in master branch. It is strange. I saw many commits on systemvmtemplate, but not on system64template. Maybe we need to fix it. -Wei 2014-12-08 15:32 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland : > Whei Zou, shouldn't this be in the systemvm64template dir mostly. I > think

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been spending enough time in the newer branches lately:( On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Daan, > > system64template dir does not exist in master branch.

Re: 答复: 答复: Cloudstack and Disaster Recovery

2014-12-08 Thread Nux!
Yeah, that's what I meant by "not straighforward". :-) I'll stick with my libvirt/KVM setups for now. Cheers Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Star Guo" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 8 Decembe

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to ca5c800

2014-12-08 Thread Wei ZHOU
I just checked it. That is because Leo Simons made the changes for CLOUDSTACK-7143. Nice! 2014-12-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland : > Ok, It might be someone deleted the 32bit dir and renamed the 64bit > dir. Makes sense if we no longer support 32bit. I have not been > spending enough time in th

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
lgtm, do i look for a pull request, or just merge? On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to get the > system vms building again. The building is currently broken because of a > compatibility issues. > > This merge

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Will Stevens
I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the simplest way. A pull request is great for non-committers to contribute, but I think it is a bit disjointed for committers who already have access to create fix branches. Do you agree? ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudO

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday? On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Thanks for listening to my concerns folks... and I'll be rooting for those > of you that are "doing" to come up with some better practices for the > community to adopt! > > On Fri

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the reader;) On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am not hosting a public repo with the fix. I think a merge is the > simplest way. A pull requ

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Ovmsupport

2014-12-08 Thread snuf
Github user snuf commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-66134697 Hi Rohit, Well there are a couple of things here: 1st: I work on a fork and pull in upstream master and merge that into ovmsupport (https://github.com/snu

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Will Stevens
Fair enough. :) Just merge the branch this time and we will figure out the details going forward. I think reducing the work for the person doing the merge will help collaboration (even if the committer has to do a bit more work), so I am open to how we do this... ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Develo

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Daan Hoogland
merged On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting > on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the > reader;) > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: >> I am not hosting a public

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Will Stevens
Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is working correctly. Lots of things in the queue though, so it may take a while. ws *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* t

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
> On déc. 5, 2014, 9:43 après-midi, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > > Does the feature include the capability to update or change userdata once > > the VM is created? No, it is an optional textarea in the instanceWizard - Axel --- This is an

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

2014-12-08 Thread Axel Delahaye
> On déc. 5, 2014, 5:55 après-midi, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on > > master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch. I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent - Axel ---

[DISCUSS] Issues with Ubuntu instance creation

2014-12-08 Thread Tim Mackey
I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues, but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the right thing. Here's my list of issues, and what I did to get past my "issue"

jenkins.buildacloud.org

2014-12-08 Thread Will Stevens
Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the workload. Is this an expected outage? Cheers, *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps*

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

2014-12-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
> On Dec. 5, 2014, 5:55 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly on > > master? I'll add known UI contributors who may help review your patch. > > Axel Delahaye wrote: > I have the new diff but I can't upload it for J.F. Vincent Send

[ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage

2014-12-08 Thread benoit lair
Hello Folks, My environment is ACS 4.3.0 with xenservers 6.2.0 When taking snapshots, there are stocked in the primary storage (supposing calling native xenservers apis). In my remembers i have already seen (with xenservers) snapshots stocked on secondary storage. How can i achieve this ? My

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

2014-12-08 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? We have not had a successful build in 3 days and the queue is growing but there does not seem to be any build slaves in action handling the workload. Is this an expecte

Re: [ACS 4.3] Snapshots on secondary storage

2014-12-08 Thread Nux!
I think you need to take VOLUME snapshots for them to be stored on the SS. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "benoit lair" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 8 December, 2014 16:57:34 > Subject: [ACS

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
Also raised the issue a few days ago. Hugo seemed awfully busy. Erik Den mandag 8. desember 2014 skrev Rohit Yadav følgende: > > > On Monday 08 December 2014 09:49 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > >> Has something happened to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/ recently? >> >> We have not had a successfu

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #671

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #211

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: make the VPN feature work more reliable a...

2014-12-08 Thread remibergsma
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/54 make the VPN feature work more reliable and secure At Schuberg Philis we wanted to use the VPN feature, but found it hard to make it work in a reliable way. When we dove into it, we found som

Re: jenkins.buildacloud.org

2014-12-08 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Heya, Restarted Jenkins after cleaning up some space. Hopefully this will keep Jenkins running for a couple of days. When i have some more time i’ll try and think of a more permanent solution. @David, would it be possible to add an extra disk to this box? A 100Gb disk would go a long way. C

Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-singlerun #755

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

[CVE-2014-7807] Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds

2014-12-08 Thread John Kinsella
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 CVE-2014-7807: Apache CloudStack unauthenticated LDAP binds CVSS: 7.5, AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Vendors: The Apache Software Foundation Citrix, Inc. Versions Afffected: Apache CloudStack 4.3, 4.4 Description: Apache CloudStack may be configured

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Feature cenik123 vpcvrr 1.1.1

2014-12-08 Thread Karl Harris
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:50 AM, lsimons wrote: > Github user lsimons commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65199170 > > Hey folks, > > Karl thanks for contributing. Looks like quite a bit of work! > > Rohit thanks for CC-ing m

Re: KVM - VM snapshot (round 2)

2014-12-08 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
It is still doing the same, I suspect that this is an intentional behavior of qemu, it keeps the disk space for future use. However I haven't found any documentation on how users should free the space. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > As far as I know, KVM does support memory

Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #84

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
FYI During my regression testing of 4.5, I noticed a storage-related issue with regards to VMware. I had to correct it in be38b9706615d5ab0cc9959577b0fff9a36a9fc6. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you. I have kicked off a system vm build to make sure everything is >

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #756

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

2014-12-08 Thread scan-admin
Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 7 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan. 8 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan. New defect(

Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi, when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access logs as remote IP. Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other rea

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port forwading) because all connections appear to come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. This is terrible design/bug - can

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi, > > when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access > web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access > logs as remote IP. > > Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ? > My under

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Erik Weber
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to > come from main Public IP of the VPC VR. > So we can not block some stuff on firewall onVM (while doing port > forwading) because all connections appear to come from m

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Erik - yes I know of shared network - been using that, but want to move behind VPC to organize stuff a little bit more... ok, for loadbalancing - did not check, as that is not my problem at the moment. But port forwarding really is - this is really bad implemenation or bug in my opinion, never

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Marcus
It sounds like some iptables rules got broken at some point for the static NAT, and since there's still a catch-all SNAT for outbound it gets caught by that and still keeps working, but is broken in a subtle way that goes unnoticed. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Andrija Panic wrote: > And just

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

2014-12-08 Thread Marcus
Or wait, you're not using static NAT, you're just using port forwarding, correct? Everything will be NAT'ed outbound to the VPC router's public IP per SNAT, like one would expect behind a NAT. You could force outbound to match the IP that the port forwarder is on, but what if you have multiple IPs

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #85

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Re: [DISCUSS] Issues with Ubuntu instance creation

2014-12-08 Thread John Kinsella
> On Dec 8, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Tim Mackey wrote: > > I've been working through a series of issues getting Ubuntu 12.04 LTS > templates to provision correctly, and I *think* most are really doc issues, > but before I run off and update docs I wanted to confirm that I'm doing the > right thing.

[Question] System VM

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to primary storage from secondary storage. This code - related to ESXi - gets run in the SSVM. Is it sufficient if I rebuild the codebase using the systemvm profile, destroy my SSVM, and allow a new one to be created? Does thi

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #757

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #86

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

RE: [Question] System VM

2014-12-08 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [Question] System VM > > Hi, > > I was wondering, I changed code related to copying a template down to primary > storage from second

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #758

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Re: [Question] System VM

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks, Sateesh! On Monday, December 8, 2014, Sateesh Chodapuneedi < sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > ] > > Sent: 09 December 2014 05:41 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: [Question

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #87

2014-12-08 Thread jenkins
See

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread Rajani Karuturi
4.5 is merged to master as of commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec8939b4822e527e8c7 I hope few more would try merging, now that the conflicts are resolved. ~Rajani On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > last attempt was a failure with travis failures before and after the pull > re

Re: [ACS44] router upgrade issue

2014-12-08 Thread Rajani Karuturi
This looks like recurring problem we are going to face again in the future version. Especially given that its so deep in a java file, its very easy to slip it for a release. Can we use the max version of a 'completed' step from the version table? Or make this configurable and update it in the docs

Re: [Question] System VM

2014-12-08 Thread Nitin Mehta
I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec. storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate the new iso which will contain your code change. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SystemVm.iso#SystemV m.iso-VMWare Thanks, -

Re: merge from 4.5 to master

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Have we ever decided what to do when people check code into, say, 4.5 and it is not supposed to go into master? Merging everything from 4.5 to master is not always desired. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > 4.5 is merged to master as of > commit 701199fca726c68b4fc09ec893

Re: [Question] System VM

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks, Nitin! On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > I kind of doubt that the new systemvm.iso will be propagated to the sec. > storage. You can always follow the process in the wiki [1] to propagate > the new iso which will contain your code change. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache

[QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

2014-12-08 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Hello, When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an account, then 1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size) 2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the account? Currently I can see s

Review Request 28836: CLOUDSTACK-8048: Fix test_ss_limits.py

2014-12-08 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28836/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are using XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume, each subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the prior snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with CloudStack). That bein

  1   2   >