Re: Review Request 24696: Only attempt to shrink volume in test if CLVM is in use

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24696/#review52138 --- Ship it! Ship It! - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Sept. 2, 2014, 1

Re: Review Request 24696: Only attempt to shrink volume in test if CLVM is in use

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24696/#review52141 --- Pushed to master : 9b783d19ad7e784d3751f4eaa2a672401d122a01 - Srika

Re: Cherry-picking fix that may change 4.3.1 schema

On Sep 2, 2014, at 11:59 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > this was to your suggestion of "a separate tool that does (rolling) > upgrades" which i think is a new proposal. I should have made it clear in > my mail about it and should have started it with "right way according to > me". > > "right way

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3443

See

Commit cd8af6a

Min, I’m checking some findbugs reports and found the following piece of code in VolumeDataStoreVO (line 352): public void setRefCnt(Long refCnt) { if (refCnt > 0) { refCnt--; } else { s_logger.warn("We should not try to decrement a zero refere

Re: Cherry-picking fix that may change 4.3.1 schema

On Sep 2, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > On 02-Sep-2014, at 5:07 pm, Francois Gaudreault > wrote: >> I see. Well, I think we were impacted by that too, and we made the decision >> to move on 4.4.1-snap (even if it's technically less stable?) and then >> upgrade to 4.4.1 GA (next

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #270

See

Re: Cherry-picking fix that may change 4.3.1 schema

4.3.1 to 4.4.1 then should contain all effort that is also in 4.3.0 to 4.4.0 I don't look forward to the work but it is doable. What bothers me most is that we are putting so much enegy into 4.3.1 at the moment while 4.4.1 is about to be rc'd. -- an anonymous commit to commit upgrade advocate /

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #271

See

Review Request 25292: CLOUDSTACK-6898: [Hyper-V] fixed rdp console freezing during reboot.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25292/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6898 http

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25289/#review52151 --- client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #272

See

Review Request 25293: Test script to verify vm deployment with two networks in SG enabled advanced zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25293/ --- Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu, Santhosh Edukulla, and Srikanteswar

Re: Cherry-picking fix that may change 4.3.1 schema

On Sep 3, 2014, at 4:32 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > 4.3.1 to 4.4.1 then should contain all effort that is also in 4.3.0 to 4.4.0 > > I don't look forward to the work but it is doable. > > What bothers me most is that we are putting so much enegy into 4.3.1 at the > moment while 4.4.1 is about t

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #273

See

Re: Clarification on github or and TravisCI

On Sep 2, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Stephen Turner wrote: > So just to be clear, Sebastien, does that mean it's acceptable for > non-committers to submit their code for review via a Github pull request, > instead of using ReviewBoard? (I hope so: I think that will make the process > easier and so en

RE: Realhostip service extended till Sep 30th

If you are using the latest cloudstack build from master or 4.4 branch, you can upload custom certificates via the UI, instead of invoking the UploadCustomCertificate API directly. We changed the "SSL Certificate" dialog to allow uploading chained SSL certificates, see CLOUDSTACK-6695

Re: Clarification on github or and TravisCI

> It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it an official mechanism. Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain point for a few reasons: 1) Large patches fail to upload, especially if they contain images. I recall sending many patches by e

Re: Clarification on github or and TravisCI

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > > It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it > an official mechanism. > > Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain > point for a few reasons: > > +1 as a non-committer it is far easier

API calls and keys

Hello, I am using a html/php script to read in userid, password and domain id from the user. Using CloudStackClient.php, I am able to call most of the api's, like list vm's, and the output seems correct. And I want to use some API's via like: http://XXX.XXX.XXX.5:8080/client/api?command=s

RE: jsonObj is not defined. UI development problem.

Hi Gabor, Thank you very much for your reply. Yeah, I spent quite some time on it and it's not so straight forward. So it would be nice if contributor could assist us here. I've tried to contact the main contributor for that file, but have no answer for quite long time :\ Very good find you ma

Re: Cherry-picking fix that may change 4.3.1 schema

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2014, at 11:59 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > >> this was to your suggestion of "a separate tool that does (rolling) >> upgrades" which i think is a new proposal. I should have made it clear in >> my mail about it and should ha

Re: Clarification on github or and TravisCI

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: >> It's doable but have not yet discussed and voted if we wanted to make it > an official mechanism. > > Would love to see it happen. I recall review board being a massive pain > point for a few reasons: > > 1) Large patches fail to upload, especial

Re: Review Request 25187: test_delete_account and test_releaseIP failing in advanced zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25187/ --- (Updated Sept. 3, 2014, 3:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Ashutosh Kelk

Re: API calls and keys

You need to generate the signature; sample code us here: http://abhisekbasu.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/how-to-generate-signature-for-cloudstack-api/ You may also consider using login api in your scenario. Sent from my iPhone > On 3 Sep 2014, at 8:11 pm, "Giri Prasad" wrote: > > Hello, > > I am

Review Request 25301: CLOUDSTACK-7442: Fixed template permission issue in test_project_resources.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25301/ --- Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, and SrikanteswaraRa

Re: Commit cd8af6a

Thanks Hugo for pointing that out. That is a bug caused by copy-and-paste, the code should be in decrRefCnt routine like other SnapshotDataStoreVO and TemplateDataStoreVO. I will fix this in a minute. -min On 9/3/14 12:30 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Min, > >I¹m checking some findbugs reports

wiki on systemvm.iso

I created a short write up on systemvm.iso to the best of my knowledge. Devs/Users can use this to understand how systemvm.iso is propagated and use it to debug their setup. Since its propagation depends on each hypervisor I might have missed few things so please review and correct it. https://

Cloudstack Build Failed

Hi All, We are working on a cloudstack based project named "Resource Aware and Policy Based VM Scheduling in Medium-scale Clouds". Our group is really new to Cloudstack and currently trying to build and install cloudstack from source. We followed the documentation at docs.cloudstack.apache.org

Cloudstack Build Failing

Hi All, We are working on a cloudstack based project named "Resource Aware and Policy Based VM Scheduling in Medium-scale Clouds". Our group is really new to Cloudstack and currently trying to build and install cloudstack from source. We followed the documentation at docs.cloudstack.apache.org and

Re: Review Request 25235: vGPU service offering upgrade test automation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25235/ --- (Updated Sept. 3, 2014, 6:12 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark, J

Re: Commit cd8af6a

H Min, what is this fix for? On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Fix is checked into master branch. Can I back port it to 4.4? > > Thanks > -min > > On 9/3/14 9:42 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: > > >Thanks Hugo for pointing that out. That is a bug caused by copy-and-paste, > >the code s

Re: Commit cd8af6a

Fix is checked into master branch. Can I back port it to 4.4? Thanks -min On 9/3/14 9:42 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Thanks Hugo for pointing that out. That is a bug caused by copy-and-paste, >the code should be in decrRefCnt routine like other SnapshotDataStoreVO >and TemplateDataStoreVO. >I will f

Re: Commit cd8af6a

This is a bug that will impact reference counting only for old volume on NFS to S3 object store migration. Thanks -min On 9/3/14 11:25 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Min, > >what is this fix for? > > >On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> Fix is checked into master branch. Can I

Re: Commit cd8af6a

guess you should go ahead and backport. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Min Chen wrote: > This is a bug that will impact reference counting only for old volume on > NFS to S3 object store migration. > > Thanks > -min > > On 9/3/14 11:25 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > > >H Min, > > > >what is thi

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #274

See

[REVIEW] CLOUDSTACK-7468 in master

Here is a link to the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7468 This fix has been committed in the 4.4 branch already. I have pushed a feature branch called 'CLOUDSTACK-7468' to the ASF repo which is a branch off master with the fix applied. The fix for master is here: https:/

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #275

See

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

> On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:32 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in, line 37 > > > > > > Can we get the JAVA_HOME from installed java instead of hardcoding it? > > The path may be different fo

Re: wiki on systemvm.iso

Thank you for this. It has been a common question than many people have just had to figure out. On Sep 3, 2014 11:40 AM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: > I created a short write up on systemvm.iso to the best of my knowledge. > Devs/Users can use this to understand how systemvm.iso is propagated and > use

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #276

See

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

> On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:32 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in, line 37 > > > > > > Can we get the JAVA_HOME from installed java instead of hardcoding it? > > The path may be different fo

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #277

See

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

> On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:32 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in, line 37 > > > > > > Can we get the JAVA_HOME from installed java instead of hardcoding it? > > The path may be different fo

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #278

See

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Alex Brett wrote: > > >> On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:32 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: >> > client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in, line 37 >> > >> > >> > Can we get the JAVA_HOME from installed java i

Re: Review Request 24882: CLOUDSTACK-6282 - Added skip condition when hypervisor is hyper-v for tests which are not applicable for hyper-v

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24882/#review52262 --- test/integration/component/test_escalations_ipaddresses.py

RE: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

On 04 September 2014 00:45, David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us] wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Alex Brett wrote: >> To expand on this a little bit - in RHEL 6.3 if you have both Java 1.6 and >> Java 7 installed, the default behaviour with the alternatives mechanism >> makes 1.6 the default Ja

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Alex Brett wrote: > On 04 September 2014 00:45, David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us] wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Alex Brett wrote: >>> To expand on this a little bit - in RHEL 6.3 if you have both Java 1.6 and >>> Java 7 installed, the default behaviour with

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #279

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #280

See

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22799/#review52266 --- Just checking in again to see where we're at with this feature. Tim?

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #281

See

Re: Review Request 25293: Test script to verify vm deployment with two networks in SG enabled advanced zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25293/#review52275 --- Ship it! Ship It! - suresh sadhu On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:58 a.m., sa

Re: Review Request 25293: Test script to verify vm deployment with two networks in SG enabled advanced zone

> On Sept. 4, 2014, 4:05 a.m., suresh sadhu wrote: > > Ship It! addressed the preview review comments and looks good to me. - suresh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25293/#re

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #282

See

Re: Commit cd8af6a

Backported to 4.4 branch. -min From: Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 11:52 AM To: dev mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Min Chen mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>> Subject: Re: Commit cd8af6a guess you should go ahead and backport. On Wed, Sep 3,

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #368

See Changes: [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-6236:fix a copy-and-paste error for decrRefCnt in -- [...truncated 2618 lines...] [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resour

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: Update templates.rst

Github user baiqj commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/18#issuecomment-54411743 my email is linux...@gmail.com thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

Re: Review Request 24794: Review request for CLOUDSTACK-6169 - assignVirtualMachine leaves associated tags assigned to old account

Gentle reminder.. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Namita Chaudhari < namita.chaudh...@sungard.com> wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/24794/ > ---

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #283

See