Review Request 23793: CLOUDSTACK-7137: Resolving cleanup issue in test_escalations_securitygroups.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7137 h

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratulations Rajani. -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: 22 July 2014 11:53 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani Karuturi to become a c

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

> On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, line 133 > > > > > > Is this change required, compared to earlier devcloud cfg, it was a > > working cfg for devcloud.

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

> On July 21, 2014, 1:58 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, line 133 > > > > > > For devcloud deployments the mgtSvrIp should be .10 as the management > > server is running on the de

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 7:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 7:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratulations Rajani ! 2014-07-22 8:23 GMT+02:00 Prasanna Santhanam : > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > she > has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contrib

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratulations Rajani ! -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani Karuturi

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani. -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani Karuturi to becom

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani! Regards, Gaurav On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Saksham Srivastava < saksham.srivast...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Rajani. > > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subje

Re: Review Request 23750: Fixed Coverity Reported Issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/#review48350 --- Santosh, you can commit this directly right? Just make individual c

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

> On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 1099 > > > > > > Instead of this, can we make "logger" node under devcloud.cfg as > > similar to setup/dev/adv

Re: Review Request 23750: Fixed Coverity Reported Issues

> On July 22, 2014, 8:01 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Santosh, you can commit this directly right? Just make individual commits > > of each file/component so its easy to track down any issues later. Sure, i will commit, but please do a review and i want to be sure that no regression issues

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani! -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 11:53 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani Karuturi to become

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani! On 22 July 2014 09:12, Koushik Das wrote: > Congrats Rajani! > > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 11:53 AM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer > > The Project Managem

Re: Review Request 23750: Fixed Coverity Reported Issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 8:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 22805: CLOUDSTACK-1466:Adding automation tests for Secondary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 8:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani ! On 22/07/14 11:53 am, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that >she >has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute >mor

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani !! -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer Congrats Rajani ! On 22/07/14 11:53 am, "Prasanna Santh

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Thanks everyone !! ~Rajani On 22-Jul-2014, at 2:15 pm, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote: > Congrats Rajani !! > > -Sanjeev > > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:11 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subje

Re: Ceph Question (Wido?)

On 07/22/2014 07:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: Hi, I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel free to chime in. :) Hehe I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCCEU13 in Amsterdam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57voBP_zdf8&feature=youtu.be In it, Wido

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm truly sorry for that, but didn't I see other votes come along? For me personal

Re: Review Request 23750: Fixed Coverity Reported Issues

Santhosh, these coverity findings should unveil hidden regression possibilities and that's alright. I think you should just commit them with a marker like 'coverity:'. we'll have to deal with the regressions when we encounter them (and write appropriate unit tests as they come along) On Tue, Jul 2

Re: Review Request 23617: Add Nic UUID to the context so that we can read the same in event bus after create a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 9:15 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 23617: Add Nic UUID to the context so that we can read the same in event bus after create a nic

> On July 17, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 960 > > > > > > Why is it made create=true when it is not a BaseAyncCreate cmd ? > > create=true should be add

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon >> releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. >> > > So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm truly s

Re: Resource [DataCenter:6] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router

Hi Vihar and all, Thanks, managed to resolve this problem. After checking agent.log, I found out that the /var partition on the VR is full, due to verbose log I enabled when troubleshooting the DNS service issue on another thread. I disabled back the debugging and delete the log file which is tak

Re: Review Request 23617: Add Nic UUID to the context so that we can read the same in event bus after create a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 9:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

RE: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

Even, i agree, the effort from people adding features, fixes and others like RM should not go in vain, and not set something as a wrong precedent of abandoning a release. Regards, Santhosh From: Wido den Hollander [w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, July 22,

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

On 07/22/2014 11:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. So this is not a good thing. Hone

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/#review48356 --- The patch applies cleanly now, thanks for rebasing. Can you have a

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

1. If EX: 20 check-ins happens between two runs, and say 2 test cases failed for a given run, how do we know which check-in caused the failure in an automated CI environment which runs automatically from start to end? Regards, Santhosh From: Sudha Ponnag

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Santhosh - In the current model no need to know. All 20 check-ins are considered culprits. That subgroup of check-ins need to be reviewed and responsible developer need to fix. Ideally CI should be run for each check in however given the time it takes to run the Marvin automation, it is being

Re: Review Request 23614: New test for deploying vm with static ip address

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23614/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 12:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edu

Setting up a CloudStack dev environment on Windows7

Hii, I installed cygwin from http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com.. I'm following the cheatsheat for setting up the environment. Can anyone please help me what is meant by - mklink mkisofs.exe genisoimage.exe - mklink python.exe python2.7.exe

Re: Review Request 22805: CLOUDSTACK-1466:Adding automation tests for Secondary Storage Limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/#review48358 --- test/integration/component/test_ss_domain_limits.py

Re: Review Request 23614: New test for deploying vm with static ip address

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23614/#review48359 --- test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

-1 (here is my vote for this thread :-P) Shouldn't we improve release management process instead? Look like releasing 4.4 is a huge pain, I guest it shouldn't be that way. Could we have a discussion session regarding Release management at the next CCCEU14? There was one at Denver and I think the

RE: Setting up a CloudStack dev environment on Windows7

Those links allow one .exe to be substituted for another. For instance, mkisofs.exe is not really available on windows; however, genisoimage.exe offers the same functionality and takes the command line parameters. Using mklink mkisofs.exe genisoimage.exe, you create a file system entry for m

Re: Setting up a CloudStack dev environment on Windows7

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753194.aspx ~Rajani On 22-Jul-2014, at 5:41 pm, Priyanka Deepala mailto:priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hii, I installed cygwin from http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com.. I'm following the cheatsheat for setting up the environment. Can anyone pl

Re: Review Request 23617: Add Nic UUID to the context so that we can read the same in event bus after create a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 12:35 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kaval

RE: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

It might help to ask what's stopping people from voting. It would seem the correct approach is to only vote for an RC if you've been part of the QA process either formally by having overseen the build validation infrastructure or informally by having installed the RC and run some tests. Perhaps

Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7155 and CLOU

Review Request 23805: Added "state" parameter to the "listPublicIpAddresses" API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Ilia Shakitko. Repository: cloudstack-git D

Public Network broadcast_domain_type is overwitten when adding VXLAN guest traffic type

Hi All, I've added a bug for VXLAN to JIRA - CLOUDSTACK-7157 If I add a guest traffic type of VXLAN it changes the Public network to using VXLAN as well (regardless of what you have previously set) Regards, Paul Angus Senior Consultant

Review Request 23807: List templates API returns destroyed templates when recopying the template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23807/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7156 https:

Review Request 23808: listCapacity API missing types for certain zones

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23808/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7158 http

Re: Setting up a CloudStack dev environment on Windows7

Tanq On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753194.aspx > > ~Rajani > > > > On 22-Jul-2014, at 5:41 pm, Priyanka Deepala > wrote: > > Hii, > I installed cygwin from http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 1:20 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kav

Re: Review Request 23808: listCapacity API missing types for certain zones

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23808/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 1:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kav

Re: Review Request 23805: Added "state" parameter to the "listPublicIpAddresses" API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 1:39 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Ilia Shakitko

Re: Review Request 23805: Added "state" parameter to the "listPublicIpAddresses" API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 1:39 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Ilia Shakitko

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

-1 on abandoning 4.4 If you are not getting VOTEs, ping the private@ and ask PMCs to vote, you only need 3 pmc vote to release. I am inundating by emails and did not even see the new VOTE thread, I left it as the last VOTE that got -1 within 24 hours. As to why this is happening, I expressed

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

Sebastien, this is not about git. And the last RC did not get any vote. It got one problem reported which turned out to be a user error. I repeat: No vote at all. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > -1 on abandoning 4.4 > > If you are not getting VOTEs, ping the private@

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Sebastien, this is not about git. And the last RC did not get any > vote. It got one problem reported which turned out to be a user error. > I repeat: No vote at all. > If you think that's the problem, then you keep the VOTE open until you ge

RE: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

For completeness, the original email: http://markmail.org/message/3yknkjr2gnvfcqxb > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 July 2014 14:46 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4* > > Sebastien, this is not about git. And th

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

+1 on release ps: the vote does not have to be closed. On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Pierre-Luc, > > I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why: > > The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template wasn't > pre-downloaded prior to

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the better of me. +1 (binding) On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > +1 on release > > ps: the vote does not have to be closed. > > On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > >> Pierre-Luc, >> >> I¹ve closed the bug as

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

+1 On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the better of me. > > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > +1 on release > > > > ps: the vote does not have to be closed. > > > > On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM,

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

this is maybe not according to proceedings as defined, but this is a result of +3 binding after more then 72 hours. anyone for drinks? On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > +1 > > On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the b

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

Ship it! :) On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote: > this is maybe not according to proceedings as defined, but this is a > result of +3 binding after more then 72 hours. > > anyone for drinks? > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski > > wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Tuesday, Jul

[ACS44]: Git Push Summary

I pushed the tag 4.4.0 on the latest RC to the central repo. @Wido: can you create the deb packages and upload them? @Pierre-Luc: can you finalize the release docs? @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those? regards, Daan -- Forwar

Re: Ceph Question (Wido?)

Thanks, Wido! On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 07/22/2014 07:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel >> free to chime in. :) >> >> > Hehe > > I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCC

Review Request 23812: CLOUDSTACK-7147: Resolving test script issue in test_ip_reservation.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23812/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7147 h

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

also, What about SystemVM template. I still don't know if we need to upgrade them in 4.4 and what should be the URL for them? Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

I will update the RN and make the 4.4.0 available later today. What about the API doc? a huge amount of api got modified. How could I build and update the api doc at: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/ *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.568

Review Request 23813: CLOUDSTACK-7044: Portable IP Range test case changes - reading portable ip range from test_data.py file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23813/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7044 h

Review Request 23814: CLOUDSTACK-7148: Adding missing "list" in method call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7148 h

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

-1 We should release 4.4 On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon > releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. > > +1 if you are in favor of not releasing > 0 if you are in favor of just not releasing 4.4 > -1 if you a

Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

Hi, Apologies for not getting much involved with 4.4, I had zero time to test anything, so couldn't vote blindly. Having said that, -1 on abandoning, getting 4.4 out of the door, even if it's crappy, will get more people interested to test it which will hopefully lead to a great 4.4.1. I hop

proposing sane git organization of redundant router work

(mostly for schuberg philis internal, but CC to cloudstack as fyi in case someone is following our github) Hey folks, Just discussing with Daan. Now that we’re figuring out our plan for writing the code a bit, I think we have to reflect that in source code management. First, for reference, clo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratulations! On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > she > has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to c

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratz! -Original Message- From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:53 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer Thanks everyone !! ~Rajani On 22-Jul-2014, at 2:15 pm, Sanjeev Neelarapu wr

Re: rfc: newsystemvm

Thanks Leo From: Leo Simons mailto:lsim...@schubergphilis.com>> Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 at 7:24 AM To: Chiradeep Vittal mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, int-toolkit mailto:int-tool...@sch

Re: Replace primary & secondary storage

I am not sure if we have any document for ACS 4.3. But you may be able to reference the old document, and just remember that we have replaced the following old 3 tables: template_host_ref -> template_store_ref volume_host_ref-> volume_store_ref snapshot_host_ref -> snapshot_store_ref And im

RE: FUEL-CLOUD : Frequently used entries for Localization of cloud technologies

Hi Chandan, Great initiative from FUEL project. Congratulations ! I will take a look at it and come back with my feedback. Of course, thank you for your interest in CloudStack :-) ( Thanks and Regards -Radhika -Original Message- From: chandan kumar [mailto:chandankumar.093...@gmail.co

Review Request 23819: CLOUDSTACK-2251: Automation tests for dedicated public IP addreses per tenant feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23819/ --- Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani !! On 22/07/14 10:04 AM, "Demetrius Tsitrelis" wrote: >Congratz! > >-Original Message- >From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:53 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer > >

Re: Review Request 23793: CLOUDSTACK-7137: Resolving cleanup issue in test_escalations_securitygroups.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/#review48385 --- Commit 45888e214c949d1e48d800339b366c42a7990641 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23793: CLOUDSTACK-7137: Resolving cleanup issue in test_escalations_securitygroups.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/#review48386 --- Commit 8d8190ea4e00edb0f7ce9665535adcc7a5b5097d in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23814: CLOUDSTACK-7148: Adding missing "list" in method call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/#review48389 --- Commit 981becc73585c9a789b377e18af623c325b0bc7f in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23814: CLOUDSTACK-7148: Adding missing "list" in method call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/#review48390 --- Commit dd138ceec5faa5d5b0fcdfe5cc655199b8f9187b in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23813: CLOUDSTACK-7044: Portable IP Range test case changes - reading portable ip range from test_data.py file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23813/#review48393 --- Commit 613eb12104af5c27935091127a1a19941f96e336 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23812: CLOUDSTACK-7147: Resolving test script issue in test_ip_reservation.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23812/#review48401 --- Commit 2c0765195a4a01ee51973c48d0561261d4fb01c6 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 7:19 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

> On July 22, 2014, 9:57 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > The patch applies cleanly now, thanks for rebasing. > > > > Can you have a look at the following findbug findings: > > [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:2.5.3:check (cloudstack-findbugs) @ > > cloud-plugin-network-vcs --- > > [INFO] BugIns

[CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

I was testing on a recent 4.4 build today and noticed that volume resizing for RBD volumes is not working as intended. In LibvirtComputingResource.java the 'getResizeScriptType()' function doesn't have logic for type = RBD and format = RAW or QCOW2, so it returns 'null' and the resize operation fa

RE: Setting up a CloudStack dev environment on Windows7

Hey, I tried to set up a dev environment on Windows. My advice to you is don't. Get an Ubuntu VM or go Mac based. I know it's possible and good to at least establish that it does work on all platforms, however if you are doing dev work, it's just painful. Well, it was for me. If you do get it

Upgrade path from SNAPSHOT or custom deployment

I have been working for the last few months on standing up a production environment based on CloudStack, and it seems like we are constantly waiting for features or fixes in the next release. It's looking like we will need to implement (and commit) fixes, and just build custom packages in order to

Re: [CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

On 07/22/2014 09:53 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: I was testing on a recent 4.4 build today and noticed that volume resizing for RBD volumes is not working as intended. In LibvirtComputingResource.java the 'getResizeScriptType()' function doesn't have logic for type = RBD and format = RAW or QCOW2

Re: [CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

Wido, I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind posting an update here when you've submitted the patch? As I mentioned in another post we will probably end up just having to go into production with a non-official build. We won't be able to wait for 4.5 or 4.4.x unfortunately. Thank You,

Re: [CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

On 07/22/2014 10:13 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: Wido, I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind posting an update here when you've submitted the patch? As I mentioned in another post we will probably end up just having to go into production with a non-official build. We won't be able to w

Big Switch Network Plug-in for CloudStack update

Hi, we will be updating the Big Switch Network plugin for Cloudstack, targeting the 4.6 release. The design doc for the proposed update can be seen at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/BigSwitch+Networking+Plugin. This is a first draft, any questions and suggestions for i

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

On 07/22/2014 04:56 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: I pushed the tag 4.4.0 on the latest RC to the central repo. @Wido: can you create the deb packages and upload them? I'm building the packages right now. I had to modify the debian/changelog file however to generate the 4.4.0 packages. Code-wis

Re: [CLOUDSTACK-6181] RBD Support not implemented

Wido, Excellent. As long as it passes testing we'll be golden. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 07/22/2014 10:13 PM, Logan Barfield wrote: > >> Wido, >> >> I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind posting a

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/ --- (Updated July 22, 2014, 9:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

NetScaler SDX is broken in 4.4

Hi Everyone, I would like to point out that the SDX implementation is broken in the current 4.4 (and 4.3) branches. It is currently not possible to add an SDX to CloudStack as a service provider device. Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6886 I have verified the is

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

Forgive me if this is not the right place to bring this up. If at all possible I would like to get the following fix into the 4.4 and 4.3.1 branches before they are closed for good. This fix makes the SDX usable again. I have committed it to the master branch. Here are some more details: http:/

Re: NetScaler SDX is broken in 4.4

fix applied to 4.3 branch On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I would like to point out that the SDX implementation is broken in the > current 4.4 (and 4.3) branches. It is currently not possible to add an SDX > to CloudStack as a service provider device. > > Here

Re: [DISCUSS] Acquire New Ip from a different range on shared networks

@Murali, Yes, I have a bunch of publics IPs that are accessible only by load balancers. Load balancers network are cross zone too. @Ilya, This is not exactly I am trying. @Chiradeep, Yes. @All When I acquire new IP in shared network the same IP of vms are given to the users. I would like to

  1   2   >