For completeness, the original email: http://markmail.org/message/3yknkjr2gnvfcqxb
> -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 July 2014 14:46 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4* > > Sebastien, this is not about git. And the last RC did not get any vote. It got > one problem reported which turned out to be a user error. > I repeat: No vote at all. > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > -1 on abandoning 4.4 > > > > If you are not getting VOTEs, ping the private@ and ask PMCs to vote, you > only need 3 pmc vote to release. > > > > I am inundating by emails and did not even see the new VOTE thread, I left > it as the last VOTE that got -1 within 24 hours. > > > > > > As to why this is happening, I expressed my thoughts in a thread about git > flow. Folks don't seem to be interested. > > > > Test no test, ci no ci, coverity no coverity, if we don't fix our git flow > > we will > never release on-time. > > > > -sebastien > > > > > > > > On Jul 22, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Donal Lafferty <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > >> It might help to ask what's stopping people from voting. > >> > >> It would seem the correct approach is to only vote for an RC if you've > been part of the QA process either formally by having overseen the build > validation infrastructure or informally by having installed the RC and run > some tests. > >> > >> Perhaps this is too difficult. > >> > >> DL > >> > >> PS. Tempted to flame? See > >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham's_Law > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: 22 July 2014 10:15 > >>> To: dev > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4* > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander > >>> <w...@widodh.nl> > >>> wrote: > >>>> On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon > >>>>> releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm > >>>> truly sorry for that, but didn't I see other votes come along? > >>> This was not a personal attack on you or anybody. I must apologize > >>> for sending it. > >>> > >>> ... > >>>> I saw a vote being abandoned due to a bad quorum, right? > >>> yes, that is the source for my sarcasm. I felt sorry as I sent it. > >>> the reason of my frustration is a very bad sign though. > >>> > >>> I have been thinking if this is a +1/0/-1 on my job as RM and I > >>> don't know. I do know that I wouldn't have minded a -1 as much as not > knowing. > >>> > >>> I will not abandon this work just yet but I have to threaten you all > >>> that I this is the way to make me contemplate so. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daan > > > > > > -- > Daan