Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 4.3 this env var is already there. install_packages() { DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical # Basic packages apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase iptables apt-get --

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #606

See Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-6373: listHost API response is not listing all the details of vgpuType. -- [...truncated 3066 lines...] [ERROR]

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10.04.2014 08:31, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: On 4.3 this env var is already there. install_packages() { DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical # Basic packages apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tool

Re: Review Request 19875: Fixed few issues for CLOUDSTACK-5674, CLOUDSTACK-6316

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review39997 --- Commit f866bb21e6fe8a754db1986d9fe3fd5e31db4228 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 20152: In com.cloud.utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker the key file paths are hard coded

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20152/#review39998 --- - Rajani Karuturi On April 9, 2014, 12:31 p.m., Damodar Reddy Tala

Re: Review Request 20152: In com.cloud.utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker the key file paths are hard coded

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20152/#review3 --- utils/src/com/cloud/utils/crypt/EncryptionSecretKeyChecker.java

RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog > logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase > iptables > apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install > openssh-server openssl e2fsprogs dhcp3-client tcpdump socat wget > > > -Harikrishn

RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase iptables apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install openssh-server openssl e2fsprogs dhcp3-clien

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10/04/14 3:04 pm, "Nux!" wrote: >On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >>> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog >>> logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase >>> iptables >>> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-ye

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #607

See Changes: [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-6371: Set snapshot size in copycommand answer during snapshot backup [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-6374: Remove entries from lb vm map when lb rule apply fails [kishan] CLOUDSTACK-6376: Return empty list when

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², The pop up does not go away breaking the build job. Guys, find the solution ! -abhi On 10/04/14 3:32 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: > > >On 10/04/14 3:04 pm, "Nux!" wrote: > >>On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abh

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², The pop up does not go away breaking the build job. Guys, find the solution ! We may need to use a preseed file then. Not sure how easy this is or how we

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10/04/14 4:23 pm, "Nux!" wrote: >On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing >> "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², >> The pop up does not go away breaking the build job. >> >> Guys, find the solution ! >> > >We may need to use a

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², The pop up does not go away breaking the build job. Guys, find the solution ! -abhi This sort of works for me: (I'm downgrading to the vulnerable versio

Re: Review Request 19875: Fixed few issues for CLOUDSTACK-5674, CLOUDSTACK-6316

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40005 --- Commit ef9471692d485c6d4ae65fa334bca03cc18a3ca5 in cloudstack's bran

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #608

See Changes: [wido] kvm: Add more debugging information when a volume is deleted. -- [...truncated 3066 lines...] [ERROR]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #569

See Changes: [wido] kvm: Add more debugging information when a volume is deleted. -- [...truncated 16800 lines...] [ERROR]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #108

See Changes: [wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Depend on rados-java 0.1.4 [wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Check if a snapshot is protected before trying to unprotect -- [...truncated 471

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #158

See Changes: [wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Depend on rados-java 0.1.4 [wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Check if a snapshot is protected before trying to unprotect -- [...truncated 2778

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #159

See -- [...truncated 2825 lines...] [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 2 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/ --- (Updated April 10, 2014, 3:04 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kaval

Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Summary (updated)

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Amin, Any luck on your project taking your 3 mgmt servers to 4.3 on Centos 6.5? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:10:28 +0800 > > Thanks and thanks for sharing the steps > > Kind Regards > Amin

RE: Remove Mgmt Server

One be nice to see an option in the UI to cleanly remove a management server. Thoughts? > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:38:29 -0300 > Subject: Re: Remove Mgmt Server > From: rafaelweingart...@gmail.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > I prefer to set the removed field to some data that represents t

RE: cloudmanagementserver.keystore

I created a bug report for this. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6378 > From: prashanthreddy.mand...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: cloudmanagementserver.keystore > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:49:49 + > > I have seen this issue on fresh installation of

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review40017 --- Commit 11f5bdd78de4121331b07995800f6e9e7c22f2c0 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

> On April 10, 2014, 3:29 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Ship It! commit 11f5bdd78de4121331b07995800f6e9e7c22f2c0 Author: Marcus Sorensen Date: Thu Apr 10 09:23:04 2014 -0600 CLOUDSTACK-6191 Add support for specifying volume provisioning type (thin, sparse, fat) in disk/compute off

Re: OpenSSL vunerability (bleedheart)

root@v-14-VM:~# lsof|grep -i ssl monit 11461 root mem REG 254,7 358880 15115 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libssl.so.1.0.0 root@v-14-VM:~# ps -ef|grep monit root 11461 1 0 Apr09 ?00:00:02 /usr/bin/monit -c /etc/monit/monitrc On Apr 9, 2014, at 9:

Re: Review Request 19446: CLOUDSTACK-6191: Volume provisioning type option

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/#review40019 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marcus Sorensen On April 9, 2014, 10:58 p.m.

Re: cloudmanagementserver.keystore

We traced back the issue to: commit de448ec4792eda5b47d79b26e9cb8ce96a2b22f4 Author: Wei Zhou Date: Thu Nov 7 11:09:06 2013 +0100 CLOUDSTACK-5042: change cloud.keystore to cloudmanagementserver.keystore and install it This commit only modify the keystore name, but remain the real place t

Re: cloudmanagementserver.keystore

Btw, the place used the keystore is at Link.java. --Sheng On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > We traced back the issue to: > > commit de448ec4792eda5b47d79b26e9cb8ce96a2b22f4 > Author: Wei Zhou > Date: Thu Nov 7 11:09:06 2013 +0100 > > CLOUDSTACK-5042: change cloud.keys

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

See Changes: [marcus] CLOUDSTACK-6191 Add support for specifying volume provisioning -- [...truncated 3066 lines...] [ERROR]

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

Hmm, sorry. I thought master was fixed, as we saw complaints about the rados stuff yesterday (and I saw it on my linux vm as well), but the build worked fine on my mac today. It must have only worked due to cached .m2 on my mac. I'm going to try to figure out what we need to revert to get master g

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

Ok, now I can't get it to fail locally in Linux or Mac, even with deleting my ~/.m2. Not sure what's going on. On 4/10/14, 9:48 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Hmm, sorry. I thought master was fixed, as we saw complaints about the > rados stuff yesterday (and I saw it on my linux vm as well), but the

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

It works fine on my local systems as well. I changed a maven dependency to fix a RBD bug. Wido > Op 10 apr. 2014 om 21:34 heeft "Marcus Sorensen" > het volgende geschreven: > > Ok, now I can't get it to fail locally in Linux or Mac, even with > deleting my ~/.m2. Not sure what's going on. >

Re: Remove Mgmt Server

I would love a function like this ;) On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Phillips wrote: > One be nice to see an option in the UI to cleanly remove a management > server. > Thoughts? > > > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:38:29 -0300 > > Subject: Re: Remove Mgmt Server > > From: rafaelweingart...@

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

On 10/04/14 5:24 pm, "Nux!" wrote: >On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing >> "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², >> The pop up does not go away breaking the build job. >> >> Guys, find the solution ! >> >> -abhi > > >This sort

RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

May be this can be a quick hackathon in collab. Copying Wido and Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:18 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/#review40034 --- engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/ObjectIn

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20210/#review40039 --- The root cause for this issue is that we didn't remove template_stor

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #610

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-slowbuild #570

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2590

See

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #609

Hey guys, There is/was a problem the radios jar file. Rados version 0.1.4 is the culprit. The issue has now been resolved, but it was fixed by apparently replacing the jar file in the upstream maven repo. This is pretty unfortunate for us as a release version of a maven artifact is permanently

RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

This is fixed in commit https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=0965fdb9f8f3cad8629761884eab16b2503cca1a New templates available at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/ Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [ma

Re: Review Request 19875: Fixed few issues for CLOUDSTACK-5674, CLOUDSTACK-6316

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40086 --- Commit 94fc4bf6bd110f4ec88bb874e6f2bfb0ff9bc6f6 in cloudstack's bran

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist #109

See

Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins

What is the proper way to update the systemvm-template? I already have systemvm-xenserver-4.3 registered as I've upgraded from 4.2.1, should I delete that first or use another name? -- Erik Weber On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Rayees Namathponnan < rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > T

RE: Remove Mgmt Server

+1 It should be similar to how our resources have states: enable/disable/inactive. Enable means the mgmt server node is enabled. Inactive means it shouldn't be serving new requests (in this case handle new jobs). Disable means the mgmt. server is ready to be taken down because all jobs it is

Re: Remove Mgmt Server

+1 I would love that On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > +1 > > It should be similar to how our resources have states: > enable/disable/inactive. Enable means the mgmt server node is enabled. > Inactive means it shouldn't be serving new requests (in this case handle > new job

RE: Remove Mgmt Server

Sorry. I meant it should be like maintenance state. Somehow pulled a brain fart and mixed up the two sets of states. Put the mgmtserver into maintenance -> moves into prepare for maintenance. This means the mgmtserver stops taking new jobs and prepares to hand off all agents and just wait

RE: Remove Mgmt Server

+1 on those steps. > From: alex.hu...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Remove Mgmt Server > Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:47:57 + > > Sorry. I meant it should be like maintenance state. Somehow pulled a brain > fart and mixed up the two sets of states. > > Put the m

RE: Remove Mgmt Server

I can create a JIRA request for this, but how many +1's do we need before it gets added to the "To Do" list? > From: alex.hu...@citrix.com > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Remove Mgmt Server > Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:47:57 + > > Sorry. I meant it should be like maintenance s

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Michael, Just give me two days, will feedback you. I have to leave it till late night where is the Ubuntu server crash times. Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:10 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Gotcha... What hypervisor are you using with CS? > Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... > From: a...@opencloud.net.au > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:05:29 +0800 > > Michael, > Just give me two days, will feedback you. I have to leave it till late night > where is

RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue...

Xen Server 6.1 with the latest updates As of today 11-April-2014 Kind Regards Amin -Original Message- From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, 11 April 2014 9:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Interesting 4.2.1. Issue... Gotcha... What hyper

Review Request 20250: Fixed errors with simulator VM snapshot delete and revert

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20250/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang. Repository: cloudstack-git Desc

Re: Remove Mgmt Server

+1 to the feature. On 11-Apr-2014, at 6:05 AM, Michael Phillips wrote: > I can create a JIRA request for this, but how many +1's do we need before it > gets added to the "To Do" list? > >> From: alex.hu...@citrix.com >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Remove Mgmt Server >> Date:

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

> On April 10, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl.java, > > line 134 > > > > > > Why do we need to update the old entry and

Re: Review Request 20210: List templates returns destroyed temples when copying the same template after deleting.

> On April 10, 2014, 5:25 p.m., Min Chen wrote: > > The root cause for this issue is that we didn't remove template_store_ref > > entry from db when a template is deleted from a zone and only mark them as > > 'Destroyed'. In addition, template_view db view is created by joining with > > those

Re: Review Request 19875: Fixed few issues for CLOUDSTACK-5674, CLOUDSTACK-6316

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40139 --- Commit ca67e25f2399d4c2bb7b7fde30616f6acf683f16 in cloudstack's bran