Re: Resize data-disk doesn't work after upgrade

Hi Marcus and Kirk, Good day to you, and thank you for your email replies. We are using Ceph RBD primary storage. I can't find any error information on agent.log, and I have set the logging to verbose (DEBUG) for all. Since I am using RBD, am I still able to run the qemu-img info command? I che

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

Can we discuss the folowing: Some type of device, the flutch is widely used and cloudstack supports brands a and b. Now brand c comes to the market with feature X. It grows it's market share slowly becouse of this feature and we, or better the producer implement a plugin using the new resourcedet

Re: System VM | Default Template

Maurice, Do you mean a clean install or an update? In the latter case this would be the responsibility of the cloud operator. In the first case, probably an oversight on the side of the community. regards, Daan On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Could I please inquire as

Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

Hello, Issue resolved for me. In my case, my dashboard said me, i have 0kb of storage on my secondary storage. The reason was not due to the cs 4.2, but it was entirely my fault due to a misconfiguration : My ssvm was correctly deploying, but it can't communicate with my nfs server. The reason

Re: Can't compile cloudstack 4.2 rpms from source

Yes Chip, i can just download the rpms from the cloudstack repo. However, in the past i always compiled myself my cs rpms, so i would continue on this way. But the cloudstack already-build rpms can be sufficient for my needs Wei, in my link http://pastebin.com/TNegzXUX I saw i had a building pr

RE: 4.2.1 rpm build failing - CLOUDSTACK-4808

Hey Rayees, It's fixed. You can find the 4.2 nonoss packages here if you want http://nvpmadm1.nvp.strocamp.net:8080/job/cloudstack-branch-4_2-package-rpm-nonoss/ Cheers, Hugo From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: vrijdag 4 oktober 2013 7:30 To: Hugo Trippaers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Hi, I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on the event of failure. It will also logs the events. Thanks, Jayapal On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller wrote: > supervisord maybe? > > - Original Message - > > From: "Chiradeep Vittal" > To: dev@c

RE: Wiki access

Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham Regards, Saksham -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Wiki access Mike, Tuna, Srinivas, Go, done. On 10/3/1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Could we not use the native syslog to gather the info (process monitoring will still be needed) and present an admin interface on this on the ms? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to write script utility to monito

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

this is not a counter proposal to your initiative, Jayapal. It sounds great. I just want to give cloud operators and domain admins more control on how to react on mishaps on the systemvms. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Could we not use the native syslog to gather the in

Re: Wiki access

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Saksham Srivastava < saksham.srivast...@citrix.com> wrote: > saksham you're in

RE: Wiki access

Thanks Daan. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:52 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Wiki access On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Saksham Srivastava < saksham.srivast...@citrix.com> wrote: > saksham you're in

Review Request 14489: Wrong error notification is generated when Primary storage (Cluster wide) is added with wrong path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Bugs: ht

Re: Review Request 14489: Wrong error notification is generated when Primary storage (Cluster wide) is added with wrong path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/ --- (Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 9:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh,

Re: Wiki access

need edit permissions , username: anshulg Regards, Anshul On Friday 04 October 2013 02:47 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote: > Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham > > Regards, > Saksham > > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sen

Re: Review Request 14335: CLOUDSTACK-4262: Fix TestVPCNetworkGc.test_01_wait_network_gc

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14335/#review2 --- Checking LB rules deletion after network gc looks good to me. Howeve

Re: Wiki access

anshulg is in On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > need edit permissions , username: anshulg > > Regards, > Anshul > > On Friday 04 October 2013 02:47 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham > > > > Regards, > > Saksham > > > >

Re: Review Request 14248: CLOUDSTACK: 4537 - test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py - Fixed vpc and shared network test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14248/#review26667 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. - sanjeev n On Oct. 3, 2013, 7:28 a.m

Re: Review Request 14489: Wrong error notification is generated when Primary storage (Cluster wide) is added with wrong path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/#review26668 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. - Rajesh Battala On Oct. 4, 2013, 9:4

RE: Wiki access

Please provide me edit permissions, username : abhinavr Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:saksham.srivast...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:47 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Wiki access Please provide me edit per

Re: Review Request 14489: Wrong error notification is generated when Primary storage (Cluster wide) is added with wrong path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14489/ --- (Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 10:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: XenServer Question

Hi Mike, Where do you see this information ? On the CS dashboard ? Or with xencenter, listing the sr with the windows gui ? Regards, Benoit. 2013/10/3 Mike Tutkowski > Hi, > > On one of my SRs, I see the following information: > > 100.2 GB used of 200 GB total (100 GB allocated) > > Can someo

Re: Wiki access

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Abhinav Roy wrote: > abhinavr is added

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot

This would be very great !! 2013/10/3 Daan Hoogland > go go go > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David Ortiz wrote: > > > This sounds like a great idea. > > > > > From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Revert to VM disk Snapshot

docs build with publican

Does anybody have a link to a howto that is useful for building the docs on a mac (osx 10.6)? thanks, Daan

Re: docs build with publican

guess 10.6 is lion so http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/3.2/html/Users_Guide/chap-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican.html#sect-Users_Guide-Installing_Publican-Installing_Publican_on_OSX_Lion On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Does anybody have a link to a howto that

Re: docs build with publican

On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Does anybody have a link to a howto that is useful for building the docs on > a mac (osx 10.6)? > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Developers_Guide/installing-publican.html installing publican on OSX can b

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java, line 149 > > > > > > I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4807. > > You could assign

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/ --- (Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 11:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUD

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Hey Darren, the build appears to be broken on spring-modularization. Actually a test is broken. If fixed I could generate some packages for testing. http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-yumrepo-refresh/3028/console On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:27:55AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam

Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

thank you for your answer, I tried ssvm health check script, everything looks nice - no error or warning, all works correct. This generally should happen because of management server not able to communicate with the SSVM agent. Could you run the ssvm health check script to see if the connectio

[ACS4.2.1] Automation tickets

There are around ~110 Automation tickets open. Most of them are major, can automation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~ “Aut

Re: docs build with publican

works slow but like a charme. no tinkering needed for creating the devguide in pdf format. I am about to try the rest in pdf+html thanks Sebastien On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:58 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > Does anybody have a link to a howto t

[ACS4.2.1] Doc tickets

There are around ~47 Documentation tickets open. Most of them are major, can documentation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225 > > > > > > What I am suggesting is that add a method something like > > boolean isEqual(var1,

[ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

There are around ~72 UI tickets open. Most of them are major, can documentation guys go thru the tickets and start picking them. Following Jira query will give the tickets that are open. project = CLOUDSTACK AND resolution = Unresolved AND fixVersion in ("4.2.0", "4.2.1") AND text ~ “UI" -abh

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far. Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for us to start writing tests. The only tests I've seen coming are from a specific set of people focussed on QA efforts. I want to reduce the impediment for people who are writing tests *today*. Tho

docs split of only to 4.2

H, Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait with that for some reason? Daan

Re: unable to get tiny linux template in ready state, DOWNLOAD ERROR

hi guys , finally i was able to add the instance, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting the above like helped to find the problem. i ssh'd into SSVM using sh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 root@LinkLocaip ran the script t

RE: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Do you mean UI guys?? -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:54 AM To: CloudStack Dev Cc: Brian Federle; Jessica Wang; Sonny Chhen Subject: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets There are around ~72 UI tickets open. Most of th

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Prasanna, I share Chips concern. But let me start by saying that given the effort Citrix puts in the integration testing, making it easy for your guys should be somewhat a priority. However, can we do the separation is such a way that integration tests as part of plugin and other enhancements is s

Re: [DOCS] CS-docs patch

Hello Prasanna, After sending this out yesterday I realized it would probably get stripped so Chip recommended opening issues in Jira and attaching the patches there. I've created two issues and attached patches as well as attaching a patch to another issue that came in about the docs: * CLOUD

Re: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Yes, specially the one in CC. On 04/10/13 6:16 pm, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: >Do you mean UI guys?? > >-Original Message- >From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 4:54 AM >To: CloudStack Dev >Cc: Brian Federle; Jessica Wang; Sonny C

2 questions regarding building docs

H, I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the docs? Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/zone-add.xml -> tmp/en-US/xml/zone-add.xml Beginning work on en-US Validation failed: hypervisor

Re: Review Request 14467: fix for Invalid SMTP breaks HA

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > >> Description > >> --- > >> > >> added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending > m

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:43 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtilsTest.java, line 225 > > > > > > What I am suggesting is that add a method something like > > boolean isEqual(var1,

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > I personally don't like the -all target. I generally consider the minimum

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I started building the docs of the 4.2 tree, using the cfg publican-all.cfg > I fails. Is there a defined set of targets that must/should build in the > docs? > > > Pro

Re: XenServer Question

Doh! I guess that would have been helpful info. :) It is in XenCenter. If you click on an SR and look at the General tab. http://i.imgur.com/z5F1Ct0.png On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:34 AM, benoit lair wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Where do you see this information ? On the CS dashboard ? Or with > xencen

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master > but only in 4.2? Should I cherrypick the entire tree or do we want to wait > with that for some reason? > There are two reasons that it's that way. First, some

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4799) Update Deployment Architecture Overview section

Travis: Why are we using linkend on some, and urls on others? I am reticent to put version specific urls in documents as that becomes a maintenance nightmare. --David On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Travis Graham (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-479

Re: docs split of only to 4.2

And i will hold my peace thee rest of the week. mobile biligual spell checker used Op 4 okt. 2013 16:28 schreef "David Nalley" : > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > H, > > > > Is there a reason the split of docs repo does not have anything in master > > but only in 4.2?

Re: 2 questions regarding building docs

4.2 in the new repo, yes. It doesn't fail. I happend to notice the severe message as it ran by mobile biligual spell checker used Op 4 okt. 2013 16:22 schreef "David Nalley" : > Bah - I hit send without dealing with the second question. > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote:

Re: XenServer Question

Effectively, it's very surprising. I checked my differents storage (local as iscsi sr) on xcp 1.0, xcp 1.1, xcp 1.4.90, xcp 1.6, xenserver 6.0 and xenserver 6.2, i observe that i can have a 'used' storage more important that the 'allocated' one I verified connected to my hypervisors shells and ve

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

Yes unfortunately when I did the rebase and pushed the branch, master was broken. So that failing test is not related to Spring and was removed in commit 765f56a02ced44b7d95574f5901e834c799a56fe on master. Is there any way you can ignore the failure. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Prasan

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I just cherry picked that commit, so it should be fixed now. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Yes unfortunately when I did the rebase and pushed the branch, master > was broken. So that failing test is not related to Spring and was > removed in commit 765f56a02ced

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-180 for this. Darren

Re: Scaling up cpu and memory of user vm above host capacity

changeServiceForVirtualMachine API was the old API to change the service offering for a stopped vm only. I think it shouldn't have succeeded for a running vm. Please file a bug if this is the case scaleVirtualMachine is the new API introduced in 4.2 for scaling a running/stopped vm. Do read the li

RE: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Abhi It is best to set up a shared filter. You will need to open a INFRA ticket like this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/INFRA-6145 to get relevant permissions for the JIRA Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.c

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

As per thread below with Animesh, we would like to resurrect the issue. As per my conversation with Chip, the issue for not letting component maintainers - get assignments by default - was because we wanted to maintain a balance of "getting things done" vs "letting community grow" Question to J

[SOLVED] Re: capacity of secondaey stor us eq 0. bug ir known ussue?

That¹s great Benoit. You could have also found this out running the ssvm health check script. Thumb rule - In case of ssvm/secondary storage related issues first troubleshooting step is to run ssvm health check script On 04/10/13 1:37 AM, "benoit lair" wrote: >Hello, > >Issue resolved for me. >

Re: XenServer Question

What is your storage over provisioning factor ? Even that could be the reason. Regarding allocated vs used capacity I had written a wiki[1] sometime back. Please see if it helps. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Understanding+Dashbo ard Thanks, -Nitin On 04/10/13 8:08

Re: Review Request 13938: StringUtils csv methods simplified

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13938/#review26676 --- utils/src/com/cloud/utils/StringUtils.java

Re: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp

Unfortunately, that is out of scope for our plans right now. If anyone knows who originally asked for this functionality or who is still using it, we would be interested in having discussions around the use cases these APIs are addressing and then looking into bringing that functionality into ou

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" option, > and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee. Component-based assignment is just a wa

[PROPOSAL] Remove Setters from *JoinVO

*JoinVOs are used to store entries from MySQL views, which are not editable. I think removing setters from the *JoinVOs may help avoid some potential confusion as setters seem to imply that the fields are editable, which they really aren't. I started looking around and it looks like most setter

RE: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

> -Original Message- > From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:02 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring > > Sure - I could see that working. Anyone have thoughts whether an enum > could be used instead of an integer?

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" > option, and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? > > Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee. > Component-based assignment is

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Qu

RE: System VM

Hi guys, Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What have we experienced since this time last year which has led us to reverse the original decision to keep docs in the same repo with c

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] Chip does that mean you are open to folks assigning tickets to > others? Should this be posted in the original thread > http://markmail.org/thread/btovj6t6opqxge5q. because the threads where Ilya > reopened the d

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we still constrained to migrating VMs from one host to another in the same cluster? Same question for HA. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Clayton Weise wrote: > AFAIK, no, but it's a great RFE that I would vote for. > > ---

FWD: [IP CLEARANCE] Contrail Plugin for CloudStack

FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started. I'll update this thread when we have cleared that hurdle, allowing us to accept the patch into the repo. -chip - Forwarded message from Chip Childers - Date: Fr

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:45 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

Re: System VM

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi guys, > Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning > behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What > have we experienced since this time last year which has led

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Was that a limitation caused by the primary storage only being available to a single cluster and not zone wide like 4.2.0 provides? Travis On Oct 4, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Maybe this is a silly question, but if CS handles Live Migrations, are we > still constrained to migrat

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requires a separate thread. I am trying to see if there is a way we can add a component field, primary owner fields for component available to be assigned for a given review under Http://reviews.apache.org. This way i will select component as "Automa

Re: Review Request 12134: removed txn attribute from DB annotation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/#review26678 --- Ship it! master: bd8536739c012e1025d35271ce82dbc9e5e66a8d - Darren

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:55:58PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip I get the principle behind the reasoning in thread[2] which > should be maintained but at the same time not being able to assign the issues > is a big hindrance in running a release. I am not sure if you saw m

Re: Review Request 13939: String join simplification

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13939/#review26682 --- I believe this is being blocked by 13938, can you please update to r

Re: System VM

From the perspective of a new community member being able to contribute to a separate repo that doesn't touch the app code is nice because that would open up the possibility of being a committer for the doc repo and separate that silo of work. Also less volatile in the fact that people, like me,

Re: Review Request 14451: Some test for NetUtils

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14451/#review26684 --- It seems this patch includes a lot of line length based reformatting

Re: Review Request 14290: KVMFencer cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14290/#review26687 --- I'm fine with dropping the methods that are not needed, but I don't

Re: Review Request 14405: ConstantTimeBackoff test and cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/#review26688 --- Ship it! master: 826c69fd29bb98d3f631596f72a6eb3525d83aa2 - Darren

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Yeah, that's kind of what I was interested in learning about. Now that we have zone-wide primary storage, does that mean CS is able to issue the live migration of a VM from one cluster to another (or are we still confined to clusters)? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Travis Graham wrote: > Wa

Re: Review Request 12228: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/#review26690 --- I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the cod

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Darren, I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML to resolve the conflict. I believe the Spring @Order annota

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

On 10/04/2013 10:36 AM, Edison Su wrote: How to use the way spring 4.0 did: https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-5574? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16967971/spring-ordered-list-of-beans Add order in bean. That is a spring specific API/interface. In general we should never using S

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

Response in line: > -Original Message- > From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > Not Sure, if it falls under similar lines\requ

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

On 10/04/2013 11:58 AM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: Darren, I think one of the benefits of allowing the priority to be specified in the xml is that it can be configured after deployment. If for some reason two strategies or providers conflict, then their priorities can be changed in XML to re

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On 10/4/13 10:37 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: >> > Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve "assign to me" >> option, and if unassigned goto "component" maintainer? >> >> Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal th

[HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and destroy. For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest call) to track the decomision process. When VM is deployed, we may need to do something else, but also rest based? I can see 2 ways of do

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > destroy. > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest > call) to track the decomision process. > When VM is deployed, we

Re: Review Request 14289: unit test for KVMFencer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14289/#review26691 --- Ship it! master: c9f41d40465e3cc8bd775dcfdeb3fa1907fd1e7f - Darren

Re: Review Request 14471: CloudStack Plugin guide for VXLAN

Hi Prasanna, Thank you for let me know. I'll resubmit the patch, but I cannot find the repository cloudstack-docs.git in the ReviewBoard. Do you know how to send the patch to the repository? Regards, Yoshikazu 2013/10/3 Prasanna Santhanam : > Hi, > > The docs were broken out into a separate repo

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26693 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Oct. 4, 2013, 12:57 a.m., Chris

RE: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > destroy. > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket > (rest call) to track the decomision process. > > When VM is deplo

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12228/ --- (Updated Oct. 4, 2013, 8:19 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

RE: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy > > > and > > destroy. > > > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA > > > ticket > > (rest call) to track the decomision proce

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > > We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and > > destroy. > > > > > > For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket >

  1   2   >