Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Daan, I have the following issues with OSGi: Complexity: Building OSGi components adds a tremendous amount of complexity to both the building drivers and debugging runtime issues. Additionally, OSGi has a much broader feature set than I think CloudStack needs to support. Therefore, driver

Re: UNABLE TO INSTALL a new VM instance on the HOST from a ISO

I guess you need to follow #3 in https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-templates-secondary-storage-troubleshooting.html From: Punith s mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday 21

Re: 4.2 S3 storage question

I guess you need to check your global settings for them. ++---+- --+ | name | value | description | +-

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:07:27AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rayees Namathponnan > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > cs-maven.midokura.com is down ? I am unable to create new build > > > > Is there a reason this isn't on maven central. > The original jars were serve

Re: [Doc] Please review: External SNMP and Syslog manager alerts

Doc looks good to me. Thanks, Anshul On Wednesday 21 August 2013 04:36 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi, > Documentation on sending administrator alerts to external SNMP or Syslog > managers is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link > below. This is checked in to both master

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

John, You do want 'In-process Installation and Upgrade', 'Introspection' and 'Discoverability' says that you do want flexibility. You disqualify Spring and OSGi on this quality however. If we can restrict the use of bundles to those that adhere to some interfaces we prescribe I don't think either

Re: Review Request 13627: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3441

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13627/#review25365 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Aug. 17, 2013, 9:32 a.m., Kou

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:15:21PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:07:27AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rayees Namathponnan > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > cs-maven.midokura.com is down ? I am unable to create new build > > > >

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hi, Looks like I'm receiving cloudstack-dev mails delayed; thanks for the heads-up Prasanna. cs-maven.midokura.com seems to be up and working from here - I've cleared my local cache and am rebuilding 4.2 to make sure. Rayees, what error are you getting exactly? Thanks, Dave. On Wed, Aug 21,

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hi, My 4.2 build worked fine with an empty repo. Prasanna filled me in on IM that Rayees was getting "Unknown host cs-maven.midokura.com", and we figured it's likely a DNS issue. Rayees, could you try switching to Google DNS servers (8.8.8.8) temporarily, clear your DNS cache etc? I'm certaily se

Review Request 13706: test_snapshots.py : Fixed test case test_03_snapshot_detachedDisk

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13706/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Re: Review Request 13627: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3441

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13627/#review25366 --- Commit 502c1db1030cfa01850127ba8a8e5e7b1eaf8ead in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13706: test_snapshots.py : Fixed test case test_03_snapshot_detachedDisk

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13706/#review25367 --- Can you please file a 'Test' issue on jira for this? - Prasanna San

Re: Review Request 13706: test_snapshots.py : Fixed test case test_03_snapshot_detachedDisk

> On Aug. 21, 2013, 9:56 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Can you please file a 'Test' issue on jira for this? Created Test issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4422 - Gaurav --- This is an automatically generated

Re: Review Request 13706: test_snapshots.py : Fixed test case test_03_snapshot_detachedDisk

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13706/#review25369 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 21, 2013, 9:35 a.m., Gaurav

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/ --- (Updated Aug. 21, 2013, 10:47 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, venkata swam

RE: [Doc] Cisco VNMC Doc Is Ready for Review

Thanks Sailaja and Koushik. I have fixed the following defects: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3115 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4416 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-906 From: Sailaja Mada Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 4:23 PM To: Radhika Pu

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Dave, Any chance you can get the midokura jars published to maven central? On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:13:11PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi, > > My 4.2 build worked fine with an empty repo. > > Prasanna filled me in on IM that Rayees was getting "Unknown host > cs-maven.midokura.com", and we f

RE: regarding issues related ceph integration with cloudstack

Can you please update the FS (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/RBD+improvements+based+on+new+Storage+subsystem) with below requested details(in my previous mail) .as mainly seeing the issues during/due to file system conversation happening on background from QCWo2 to RAW

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:43:17PM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Leaky Abstraction: Plugins are registered through a Spring > configuration file. In addition to being operator unfriendly (most > sysadmins are not Spring experts nor do they want to be), we expose > the core bootstrapping mechanism

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hi Chip, I'll certainly look into it. As I mentioned in my mail, my impression was that it took months for the Netscaler guys to get their jars published there. If it turns out to be a major project, I don't know if I'll have the time for it straight away. Does anyone have any pointers on the pu

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hey Dave, Never had to do it myself, but this page seems to have the basics on it: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 21 aug. 2013, at 16:11, Dave Cahill mailto:dcah...@midokura.com>> wrote: Hi Chip, I'll certainly l

Re: Secondary IP (4.1.1)

Jayapal,You say "you can add the below rules on that host" the rules I provided is a direct extract of what rules that are listed presently. Would I simply duplicate the same rules to allow a secondary IP to pass through, or is it more involved then that?Also, you mention a manipulation required in

Re: Instance Names

Hello,I did just find that CLOUDSTACk-778, reviewing it it seems to me that does not quite answer my question; unless I am missing an obvious point, which I will not let, I find myself doing that more then I would like.URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-778Is this correct?- Mauri

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:11:33PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I'll certainly look into it. > > As I mentioned in my mail, my impression was that it took months for the > Netscaler guys to get their jars published there. If it turns out to be a > major project, I don't know if I'll h

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

I also agree with this. Spring XML should always be treated as code not really configuration. It's not good to have a sysadmin touch spring config and frankly it's just mean to force them to. I would ideally like to see that registering a module is as simple as putting a jar in a directory.

4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

Per our earlier discussion 4.2-forward branch is created - please don't commit to 4.2, consider that frozen, and use 4.2-forward. If a patch needs to make it in, please send a mail to the list to alert Animesh to the fact and he can pull it over. --David -- Forwarded message -- F

JSESSIONID from API

Hi, someone know how to obtain the JSESSIONID cookie from the login API command? http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/root_admin/login.html thanks!

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

Sure. Thanks for the info. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary Per our earlier discussion 4.2-forward bra

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

How about documentation ? Reviews are still going on. -Radhika -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary Per our earlier discussion 4

RE: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hi Dave, This issue got resolved after changing the DNS server. Thanks Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:13 AM To: CloudStack Dev; Dave Cahill Subject: Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ? Hi, My 4.2

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

I will also cherry-pick doc commits > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:55 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary > > How about documenta

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

Just to make 100% sure, this means we should now commit all doc updates to both: master 4.2-forward Please let us know if that's incorrect. Jessica T. From: Animesh Chaturvedi [animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:35 AM To: d

Re: [Doc] Please review: External SNMP and Syslog manager alerts

Thanks for the quick turn-around, Anshul! Jessica T. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Anshul Gangwar wrote: > Doc looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Anshul > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 04:36 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > > Hi, > > Documentation on sending administrator alerts to external SNMP or

Re: [Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

Nitin, Thanks for the quick response. Jessica T. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > LGTM. > Thanks very much Jessica :) > > From: Jessica Tomechak > Date: Tuesday 20 August 2013 2:55 PM > To: Nitin Mehta > Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" , " > us...@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: [Doc] Please review: Update base image of VMs doc

Hari, Thanks for the quick check. I have closed the bug based on your OK. Jessica T. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Harikrishna Patnala < harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thank you Jessica for the update. Changes looks good for me. > > -Harikrishna > > On 21-Aug-2013, at 3:30 AM,

Unable to create volume - volume size xxxx, but the maximum size allowed is 0 Gb.

I get the error message: 'volume size , but the maximum size allowed is 0 Gb.' when I attempt to create a new volume. It is thrown from VolumeApiServiceImpl.validateVolumeSizeRange(int size). Unless I'm missing something, it looks like '_maxVolumeSizeInGb' is never initialized in VolumeApiS

RE: Unable to create volume - volume size xxxx, but the maximum size allowed is 0 Gb.

In 4.2 branch it gets initialized from config property "storage.max.volume.size". Storage DEFAULT management-server storage.max.volume.size 2000The maximum size for a volume (in GB). Which branch are you in? Master. Maybe some missing commit in master. > -Original Message- > F

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

Yes but do send an email to list and cc me for picking up docs > -Original Message- > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:44 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary >

Re: Unable to create volume - volume size xxxx, but the maximum size allowed is 0 Gb.

Yeah, I'm on master. That setting is set to 2000 (as found through the UI). On Aug 21, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Koushik Das wrote: > In 4.2 branch it gets initialized from config property > "storage.max.volume.size". > Storage DEFAULT management-server storage.max.volume.size 2000 > T

Re: Unable to create volume - volume size xxxx, but the maximum size allowed is 0 Gb.

It looks like in 4.2 it is set in VolumeApiServiceImpl.configure(), but that method does not exist in master (and the history only goes back 8 days). On Aug 21, 2013, at 3:08 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: > Yeah, I'm on master. That setting is set to 2000 (as found through the UI). > > On

Introduction

All, I want to introduce myself to the Apache CloudStack community. I've have had a long love/hate relationship with CloudStack over the years, but recently I've decided to fully dedicate myself to working on this platform (again). Just a little about me, well okay, this might be a little long.

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25378 --- There are hard coded IPs for netscaler devices; its very hard to man

Re: Introduction

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:16:49PM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > All, > > I want to introduce myself to the Apache CloudStack community. Welcome (back?) Darren!

Re: Introduction

Good to have you back :-) Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 21 aug. 2013, at 21:16, Darren Shepherd wrote: > All, > > I want to introduce myself to the Apache CloudStack community. I've have > had a long love/hate relationship with CloudStack over the years, but > recently I've decided to

RE: Introduction

Welcome back! > -Original Message- > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:17 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Introduction > > All, > > I want to introduce myself to the Apache CloudStack community. I've have had

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review25387 --- Commit 42e4b74402ec5aa254a5bdc714f1446894aff3af in branch refs/heads

Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes

>From 4.2-forward: (1) Commit aeb962ad13dba2f67ed582862e47657ef89b28b6 in branch refs/heads/4.2-forward from [~jessica.tomec...@citrix.com] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=aeb962a

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review25389 --- Commit 9cfd434640cf51bbd591ef4f34f90163ebb255df in branch refs/head

Re: Agent State missing or Disconnected for SSVM

I just got the same error, then found it's due to: 2013-08-22 00:20:14,759 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable to start agent: Resource class not found: com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource due to: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.cloud.storage.resource.Pre

Source NAT not applied on network startup (See Jira CLOUDSTACK-234)

Hi Murali, After this change [1], how do Source NAT IPs get applied to a network on network startup / first VM launch? Previously, applyIpAssociations would get called as part of reprogramNetworkRules, but this change introduces what it calls "a lazy approach". From what I can see, this means tha

Re: Agent State missing or Disconnected for SSVM

Thanks On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > I just got the same error, then found it's due to: > > 2013-08-22 00:20:14,759 ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:null) Unable > to start agent: Resource class not found: > com.cloud.storage.resource.PremiumSecondaryStorageResource d

Re: Source NAT not applied on network startup (See Jira CLOUDSTACK-234)

Also, I tried to find the code review for this change, but couldn't track it down - could someone point me to it? On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi Murali, > > After this change [1], how do Source NAT IPs get applied to a network on > network startup / first VM launch? >

RE: Instance Names

Maurice, Sorry the link is a feature to name instances ACS and show in hypervisor with ACS name. This is not going to help your current problem. I think Marcus gave you a correct solution, if all you need to change is UUID, then test is on 1 VM, make sure all functions well, and then proceed to

RE: Introduction

Welcome back Darren! Seems like we have a lot in common, I tend to leave "no's and not's" quite often! Since your experience was based on older CS 2.x system, I wonder how different (better or worse) it is now? Are we closer to GoDaddy hybrid solution? -Original Message- From: Frank Z

RE: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

Rayees, good point. But is it related to this fix? Probably we can have that as a separate patch? This patch is for handling NS device add and remove in setupClass/teardown for fixing failures in NS tests. I would imagine not just Netscaler IP, but also the public and private interfaces happens

Api doc categories

I've spent a few minutes trying to figure out how API commands are linked with their categories in the API documentation. I read the doc about annotations and generating the docs. I see the known_categories in gen_toc.py, but I don't see any place in the annotations where one might define a specifi

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25398 --- Commit 1c31ee22d40d77c10593d87b8237cd0489d192cc in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25397 --- Commit 1c31ee22d40d77c10593d87b8237cd0489d192cc in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25399 --- Commit e4b5d4d62e0e3c90407f426f3de1bd300b9c0359 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25400 --- Commit e4b5d4d62e0e3c90407f426f3de1bd300b9c0359 in branch refs/heads

Review Request 13727: Fix to attach uploaded volume to a stopped VM test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4425 R

RE: JSESSIONID from API

As mentioned in the doc link, you will get the sessionkey in the login command response. This login API command will give you the sessionkey in the response (with default CS username and password): http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=login&username=admin&password=password --Sanjay > -

Re: Review Request 13627: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3441

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13627/#review25402 --- Commit 5528ba4b20593e1c883507a1e161ccb48fffa57b in branch refs/head

Review Request 13728: Fix iso usage event count to match the number of image stores

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13728/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4437 R

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25403 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 21, 2013, 10:47 a

Re: Review Request 13727: Fix to attach uploaded volume to a stopped VM test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/#review25404 --- test/integration/component/test_stopped_vm.py

Re: Review Request 13727: Fix to attach uploaded volume to a stopped VM test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 6:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S

Re: Review Request 13727: Fix to attach uploaded volume to a stopped VM test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 6:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S

Review Request 13730: CLOUDSTACK-1853 Alerts-SNMP:No alerts generated for router vm when VM stopped unexpectedly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13730/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi. Bugs: ht

Re: Source NAT not applied on network startup (See Jira CLOUDSTACK-234)

Adding Chiradeep for guidance, as Murali seems to be away at the moment. Prasanna kindly verified that this is an issue with Virtual Router as well as MidoNet, so I have filed a bug against 4.2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4442 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Dave Cahill