---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10703/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 7:06 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
Hi,
Thanks. That was exactly what I was missing. Running now !!
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:07:38PM +0530, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am setting up dev environment following :
> > https://cwiki.apache
So basically you are saying; move to unix (or Cygwin) as a dev platform. I
guess I forgot to say that half my work is on a windows work station. I am
would like eclipse to reload classes on the fly as they are changed.
Thanks for your pointer, though. It is very useful.
Daan Hoogland
-Origi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das.
Description
Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch.
For 2.2.xmessages for zh_CN, and also for ja, the encoding is incorrect and
resource files are not maintained by community.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Milamber wrote:
>
>
> Le 24/04/2013 10:44, Milamber a ecrit :
>
>
>>
>> Le 23
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:08:49AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >
> > > Vijay added the ability to send userdata as POST for the
> > > deployVirtualMachine API in re
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10727/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 8:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit :
Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch.
Thanks. I just update the master branch.
For 2.2.xmessages for zh_CN, and also for ja, the encoding is incorrect and
resource files are not maintained by community.
Yes, the encoding's tra
On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber wrote:
>
>
> Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit :
>> Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch.
>
> Thanks. I just update the master branch.
>
>>
>> For 2.2.xmessages for zh_CN, and also for ja, the encoding is incorrect and
>> resou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 8:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 8:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/#review19694
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Harikrishna Patnala
On April 2, 2013, 1:24 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 9:05 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10773/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Add migration to 4.1.0 in t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10703/#review19695
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Murali Reddy
On April 25, 2013, 7:06 a.m., J
Hello !
iam new with cloudstack
i followed the installation documention
but when i trying to add iso its not be addedd
i checked the log
2013-04-25 00:41:16,783 WARN [storage.download.DownloadMonitorImpl]
(catalina-exec-12:null) There is no secondary storage VM for secondary
storage host nfs://67.2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10772/#review19697
---
Added additional reviewer
- Prasanna Santhanam
On April 25, 2013,
> On April 25, 2013, 8:55 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
> > Ship It!
Not a right time to give comments but came across a difference when comparing
with my patch on master. we need to load vm details "_vmDao.loadDetails(vm)"
before getting the details "vm.getDetail("SSH.PublicKey")". since d
> On April 25, 2013, 9:34 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Added additional reviewer
Both patches are same except the unit tests that we added on master.
- Harikrishna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10700/#review19700
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On April 22, 2013, 9:02 a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10740/#review19701
---
Can you resubmit the patch after changing scope_id/scope_name to zon
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 10:18 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Chod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10774/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, edison su, Chiradeep Vittal,
Hi,
I was able to only run management server. Now stuck at step-8. I tried
running it both way (mvn and python).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py", line 469, in
deploy.deploy()
File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py", line 452, in deploy
Sorry. Understood now that the step-8 above will do add
datacenter/pod/cluster/host etc. Need help only in step-8.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Dharmesh Kakadia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was able to only run management server. Now stuck at step-8. I tried
> running it both way (mvn and python).
>
>
Heya,
Comments inline.
I ran through the entire procedure I use to test the setup and documented it as
detailed as possible. Hope this helps:
#
# CentOS KVM installation
#
Base installation:
CentOS 6.2 Basic Server
Upgraded to CentOS 6.4:
# yum update
Install Virtualization
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:24:20PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10766/
I'm unclear about the current state of this review request. There is
the actual patch for the review [1] and an attached patch [2].
Which should be applied?
-chip
[1] https://reviews.apache.o
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:20:38PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> While releasing the documentation today I went ahead and wrote up a
> draft on the wiki so that anyone can do this in the future. Please have
> a look and suggest changes (or make them yourself, it's a wiki!)
>
> https://cwiki.apac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10766/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 1:28 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:37:08PM -0400, Han,Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone encounter the following error when building Whirr?
Wrong list?
Sorry, I attached the patch rather than updating the review diff because it
was just a quick idea and I wanted to get some feedback on it. After
working a bit more, I came up with a better solution based on that idea and
updated the diff with it.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Chip Childers wro
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:29:55AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Sorry, I attached the patch rather than updating the review diff because it
> was just a quick idea and I wanted to get some feedback on it. After
> working a bit more, I came up with a better solution based on that idea and
> updat
yes
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:29:55AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > Sorry, I attached the patch rather than updating the review diff because
> it
> > was just a quick idea and I wanted to get some feedback on it. After
> > working a bi
Sorry, I should have mentioned in my first response that I had just removed
the attachment from the review request. That would have clarified things.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> yes
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 25,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10766/#review19702
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On April 25, 2013, 1:28 p.m.,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013, at 08:27 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:20:38PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > While releasing the documentation today I went ahead and wrote up a
> > draft on the wiki so that anyone can do this in the future. Please have
> > a look and suggest change
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:33:43AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Sorry, I should have mentioned in my first response that I had just removed
> the attachment from the review request. That would have clarified things.
>
Done!
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> > y
Hi all,
The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting another 4.1.0
voting round. Help please!
CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate host to
run VM (Unassigned)
CLOUDSTACK-2172 Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed (Unassigned)
CLOUDSTACK-2190 DEB p
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013, at 08:27 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:20:38PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > > While releasing the documentation today I went ahead and wrote up a
> > > draft on the wiki so that any
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting another 4.1.0
> voting round. Help please!
>
> CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate host
> to run VM (Unassigned)
> CLOUDSTACK-2172 U
Hi Meng,
I believe you are asking this in the context of the Google Summer of Code.
Please put [GSOC] at the start of your subject line, that way we can filter
your question.
That said Chip is partially right (in that it's a Whirr question but for a
Cloudstack project :) ) and you should send
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:03:03AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi Meng,
>
> I believe you are asking this in the context of the Google Summer of Code.
> Please put [GSOC] at the start of your subject line, that way we can filter
> your question.
Ah! I see the context now. Yes, GSOC in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10776/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri,
and
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:01:11AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting another 4.1.0
> > voting round. Help please!
> >
> > CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10773/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 2:14 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Descriptio
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:40:30PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:01:11AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Chip Childers
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting anoth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10773/#review19703
---
Commit 41e6e9f30f035d9bd99d1aa3f4279ff748e8bcd4 in branch refs/heads
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013, at 08:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> PEBKAC errors are useful for others to know about... ;-)
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/blog/2013/04/25/reverting-an-svn-commit/
There ya go.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Folks,
The Xen hackathon is being held in Dublin, Ireland on May 16/17th.
Is anyone interested to go there and actually work on improving Xen/XCP support
in CloudStack ?
-Sebastien
There was a discussion regarding API name alias [1]. After adding API name
alias, we still need to have different response tags for backward
compatibility.
New: ..
Old: ..
If we are to use the same API, networkId and aclId both have to be made
optional. Would it better to have new API createNe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10776/
---
(Updated April 25, 2013, 2:40 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna San
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10773/#review19704
---
Commit 099677a1244cd55fb98d3c40ee7881223dd9ac7c in branch refs/heads
Hi
I am new in Devcloud and I want to push my algorithm in Devcloud.
I have two questions :
1) From where I should start, my mean is developing requirements.
2) I study on VMs scheduling and provisioning Algorithms please tell me which
package is for scheduling and provisioning in Cloud Stack
Hi,
Can someone please review / triage and help resolve CLOUDSTACK-2194?
-chip
I can take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2126.
Thanks
-min
On 4/25/13 6:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The following bugs are currently blocking me from starting another 4.1.0
>voting round. Help please!
>
>CLOUDSTACK-2158 'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate
>host to run V
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:18:52AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> I can take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2126.
Thank you Min!
I still need someone to look at the allocator bug (2158) and the DB
upgrade issue (2194).
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 4/25/13 6:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >The
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:22:58PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> I see where David is coming from.
>
> The longer you leave a release branch, the harder it becomes to QA, the
> harder it comes to test, and the harder it becomes to release. As has been
> mentioned already, you can think of this as a
Prasanna, I updated CLOUDSTACK-2126 with my comment. That is the intended
change done in list API performance improvement work, and I don't see any
issues by having the consistent UserVmResponse for both deployVMCmd and
listVMsCmd. Every BaseResponse class has jobId and jobStatus as serialized
fiel
Did we actually process IP Clearance for these? The summary of the
review board record implies that we did.
I do *not* see it listed on the official IP Clearance page [1]. Is this
the code that was under discussion to be granted by Citrix to ASF (but
was developed by Clogeny)? AFAIK, this was
REST based service is postponed, no active progress from mysids either.
Thanks
-min
On 4/25/13 1:10 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Prasanna Santhanam
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:08:49AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> >
>> > On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:38
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:30:08AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Prasanna, I updated CLOUDSTACK-2126 with my comment. That is the intended
> change done in list API performance improvement work, and I don't see any
> issues by having the consistent UserVmResponse for both deployVMCmd and
> listVMsCmd. E
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10774/#review19706
---
Did not test your patch but saw the diff. Mostly looks good, we'll w
Not quite : I emailed Ashutosh about the controversial subject earlier
today. We marked off 'ipclearance' as a point-in-time. This was when
(January?) the tests were contributed to ASF and went into some legal
issues. It is the point-in-time that is referred to in the request not
the code itself. T
I can take a look at it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41] New blocker for 4.1 - CLOUDSTACK-2194 - Upgrade from
> 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to encryption
In 4.0, CS has special code to return job status for a VM returned from
listVMsCmd. During API performance refactoring, I have a created a DB view
user_vm_view that joins async_job table just for that purpose and used
that view to uniformly generate UserVmResponse. So the same code will be
applied
That's odd - listXxx commands don't do async at all and shouldn't be
generating jobstatus,jobid etc. So I'm not sure why that was added in
(prior?) 4.0. I'd like to take that out too if there's no real reason
behind it.
--
Prasanna.,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:57:02AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> In
Give me a shout if you'rein town and I'll come for drinks and meet some of
you folks.
On 25 April 2013 15:34, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Xen hackathon is being held in Dublin, Ireland on May 16/17th.
>
> Is anyone interested to go there and actually work on improving Xen/XCP
> s
This would make a good blog post and tweet!
On 9 April 2013 21:25, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Folks, [BCC: users@]
>
> Apache Software Foundation (ASF) has been accepted has a mentoring
> organization for the 2013 Google Summer of Code.
>
> If you wish to be a mentor for a student to work on a
As a new user (as of today) i can say the following from my personal
experience:
The biggest hurdle (in an enterprise setting) is getting the packages for
your platform.Building packages from source is nice and all, but in my case
i don't have Internet access in the datacenter. So the whole maven
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25:12PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Not quite : I emailed Ashutosh about the controversial subject earlier
> today. We marked off 'ipclearance' as a point-in-time. This was when
> (January?) the tests were contributed to ASF and went into some legal
> issues. It is
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0700, Edison Su wrote:
> I can take a look at it.
Thanks for stepping up Edison!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subjec
Totally agree.
Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126,
and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status
in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so that
we can have consistent response return in various scenarios. I
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Totally agree.
>
> Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126,
> and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status
> in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so
Thanks Chip, will do that.
-min
On 4/25/13 10:37 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
>> Totally agree.
>>
>> Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126,
>> and we both agree that we should only return async job Id a
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Totally agree.
>
> Chip and others, Prasanna and I exchanged ideas about CLOUDSTACK--2126,
> and we both agree that we should only return async job Id and job status
> in queryAsyncJob and listAsyncJob commands, not in any other APIs so
JobId/JobStatus were introduced to the list* responses on purpose. Some of
the CS customers wanted to see what async jobs that are currently being
executed on the object, just by looking at the result of list* command.
So removing async job params from the list response is not a good idea as
custo
CLOUDSTACK-2158 is a blocker bug for 4.1.0, and I need an allocator
expert to review and fix if required.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2158
'userconcentratedpod_firstfit failed to find alternate host to run VM
Marcus laid out the situation in the bug itself.
Help please!
-c
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:48:02AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> JobId/JobStatus were introduced to the list* responses on purpose. Some of
> the CS customers wanted to see what async jobs that are currently being
> executed on the object, just by looking at the result of list* command.
>
> So
Alena is right. They were introduced eons ago for customers to figure out
which objects still had pending jobs on them without having the need to know
the async job ID in the first place. I'm not sure who's using that now but if
you remove it, it may cause existing customers that do rely on th
On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit :
> >> Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch.
> >
> > Thanks. I just update the master branch.
> >
> >>
> >> For 2.2.
I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-2158
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 6:55 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Blocker and critical issues stopping me from spinning out a
new RC for 4.1
Hi al
Looking at it.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
CLOUDSTACK-2158 is a blocker bug for 4.1.0, and I need an allocator expert to
thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:56 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
>
> Looking at it.
>
> -Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers
I looked at it a bit, still beyond me, but the actual null pointer is:
for(HostAllocator allocator : _hostAllocators) {
_hostAllocators is locally defined in this file, but empty. I'm not sure
what should be calling 'setHostAllocators'.
protected List _hostAllocators;
public List g
It should be set by Spring by looking at the applicationContext or
componentContext
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Allocator Expert Needed!
I looked
Hi,
Comments Inline.
Thanks,
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: MEHDI ALI SOLTANI [mailto:mehdi_alisolt...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:34 AM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: DISCUSS
Hi
I am new in Devcloud and I want to push my algorithm in Devcloud.
I hav
Affinity/anti-affinity UI is now ready in master.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian Federle [mailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:08 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle
Cc: Sonny Chhen; Animesh Chaturvedi; Jessica Wang
Subject: [MERGE] UI support
Found the issue, in the applicationContext .xml , the context of the
'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' needs to include the list of allocators.
This will ensure that when this component is loaded by Spring, the allocators
gets initialized.
Will put in the fix now.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Messa
On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Jörgen Maas wrote:
> As a new user (as of today) i can say the following from my personal
> experience:
>
>
Welcome - and thanks for pushing the feedback.
> The biggest hurdle (in an enterprise setting) is getting the packages for
> your platform.Building packages fr
Hi,
I'm getting an out of memory error when trying to run the management server
from Eclipse.
In my Debug Configuration, for my Goal I use the following:
-pl client jetty:run
Under the Environment tab, I have MAVEN_OPTS set to the following:
-XX:MaxPermSize=1024m -Xmx1024m -Xdebug
-Xrunjdwp:tr
I didn't mark this one as a blocker, but it's still pretty bad for someone
managing VMs in an automated fashion. Trying to stop a VM when the KVM
agent is disconnected reports success.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2195
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 02:01:56PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> I didn't mark this one as a blocker, but it's still pretty bad for someone
> managing VMs in an automated fashion. Trying to stop a VM when the KVM
> agent is disconnected reports success.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit :
Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for master branch.
>>>
>>
Hugo:
1. Your instructions here are for CentOS 6.4 environment.
However, ASF 4.2 Cloudstack is currently only supported on CentOS 6.3,
** NOT CentOS 6.4 **
Since ASF 4.2 Cloudstack has product features requiring openvswitch
support ,
That is why we need to have openvswitch
Le 25/04/2013 20:18, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit :
On Apr 25, 2013, at 1:54 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2013, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Apr 25, 2013, at 4:48 AM, Milamber >
wrote:
Le 25/04/2013 08:05, Gavin Lee a ecrit :
Done for zh_CN translation on transifex for m
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run
Hangs at following.. With out of memory.
Suggestions?
System…Info
Running OS X,
Tomcat 6.0.33,
java version "1.6.0_45"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_45-b06-451-11M4406)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.45-b01-451, mixed mode)
(One hicc
Hey Angeline,
> -Original Message-
> From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com]
> Sent: donderdag 25 april 2013 23:07
> To: Hugo Trippaers; ''; Sheng Yang; Edison Su
> Subject: RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 Cent
> OS 6.3 OVS support in KVM
>
> Hugo:
>
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
.. Parth
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sanjay Tripathi
Subject: [DOC][Review] Document ability to delete events and alerts
Hi,
Docum
Chip,
I just added the fix for CLOUDSTACK-2158 to master. Here is the commit info to
cherry-pick:
Commit hash:232d44bf6e31898887b324bcdebbc659423917e4
In the applicationContext .xml , the context of the
'UserConcentratedPodPlanner' needs to include the list of allocators.
This will e
I did further analysis on the issue (CLOUDSTACK-2126) and checked the
code back in 3.0.x and 4.0 branch, and found the following:
1. Showing pending job information for ListXXX api has been broken since
3.0.6. Based on ML discussion, this feature is requested by customers, so
we should fix this in
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
