Re: database creator

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:33:28PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > I have some queries regarding Database Creator: > > Can this feature be tested on 4.1 ? > > Could someone also provide more details on the following: > > 1. Outline the exact steps that are involved in rolling upgrade proc

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1966 Primary Storage Limits are not validated while deploying the VM

Nitin, Sailaja is testing this feature and I think she covered all the possible operations related to this feature in the Test cases she shared with the community. --Sanjay > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Mehta > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:12 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: strange output on cs4.0.1 gui when restarted

Jason, Just to clarify, you only saw this in the global settings page ? The rest of the UI is fine ? thanks -sebastien On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Jason Pavao wrote: > Sure! It'll be my first bug! Exciting! > > Issue CLOUDSTACK-2050 - encode.api.response in global settings when set to > tr

[QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: "Storage Backup Object Store Plugin Framework"

Hi, Test plan for the feature "Storage Backup Object Store Plugin Framework" is developed and placed @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage_Backup_ObjectStore_Plugin_TestPlan Please review and let me know your comments. Test cases are mentioned in excel sheet named "Ob

Re: [DOCS][TRANSLATIONS] Upate

On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Milamber wrote: > > > Le 16/04/2013 13:41, Gavin Lee a ecrit : >> Yes, Traditional Chinese moving very quickly. >> Hopefully, the other languages can have more contributors. >> >> For the UI part, I saw the characters are not recognizable (browser >> encoding set

Re: apidocs build failing on master?

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 03:09:39PM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running into the following error when trying mvn install -P > developer,systemvm -Dnonoss on top of master: > > > [INFO] > > [INFO] Bu

Re: Add/Remove Network for VM : VMware Support

FS is available at : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+Remove+Networks+to+VMs+%28Enhanced%29 Thanks, Saksham On Monday 15 April 2013 11:11 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote: > Following the discussion on bug: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 , there need

Connection to http://repo.maven.apache.org refused

Escuxe me Rohit recently I have problems building CS4.1 branch, when I pull on 04.16. I got this error: WARNING] The requested profile "deps" could not be activated because it does not exist. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (def

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1966 Primary Storage Limits are not validated while deploying the VM

I see thanks Sanjay. When you see a bug in your area its generally a good practice to see holistically something similar you missed while feature development :). On 17/04/13 12:41 PM, "Sanjay Tripathi" wrote: >Nitin, >Sailaja is testing this feature and I think she covered all the possible >oper

Re: database creator

On 17/04/13 12:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:33:28PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: >> >> I have some queries regarding Database Creator: >> >> Can this feature be tested on 4.1 ? >> >> Could someone also provide more details on the following: >> >> 1. Outl

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

Hi, On 04/17/2013 01:44 AM, Guangjian Liu wrote: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1 Anybody can help about it! Environment: 1. Server A: CS 4.0.1 OS: RHEL 6.2 x86-64 2. Server B: Ceph 0.56.4 OS: RHEL 6.2 x86-64 3. Server C: KVM/Qemu OS: Ubuntu 12.04 compile libvirt and Qemu as do

Re: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering

Thanks for sharing this with the community Prachi. I read the wiki and had a few questions. Is there a requirement doc for this ? I wanted to understand the use cases for this. Since all the attributes are visible in service offering to the end user what is it we are trying to do here ? Give the

Re: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

On 17/04/13 12:28 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:33:40PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: >> I am not able to start user Vms successfully using the build from >>master. I am testing with Xenserver 6.0.2 hosts. >> User Vm starts successfully but it gets to stopped sta

Re: [RFC][FS]PVLAN for isolation within a VLAN

Sheng, Thanks for the FS. Couple of points in FS that made me curious of the rational behind it. Why do you want to all the end user VM's (except for DHCP server VM) in shared network to be connected only to I-port's. This means that even VM's of same user can not talk to each other, right? Is'nt

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

Thanks for your mail, you suggest compile libvirt with RBD enable. I already build libvirt-0.10.2.tar.gz as document http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/libvirt/ in my SERVER C(Ubuntu 12.04), Shall I build libvirt-0.10.2.tar.gz with RBD enable? use ./configure --enable-rbd instead autogen.sh? cd lib

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

Me too not seen issues with Xen6.1 with latest templates. Able to deploy VMs and VMs are up and running state. Build number 219 Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 April 2013 12:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACL-2046 Primary Storage & Secondary Storage is max limit is set 0 with listResourceLimits API response as ROOT admin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10566/#review19312 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On April 17, 2013, 6:38 a.m.,

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACL-2046 Primary Storage & Secondary Storage is max limit is set 0 with listResourceLimits API response as ROOT admin

> On April 17, 2013, 10:20 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote: > > Ship It! Someone with the right karma should commit this change. - Devdeep --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10566/#rev

Re: database creator

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 02:07:20PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > On 17/04/13 12:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > > >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:33:28PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > >> > >> I have some queries regarding Database Creator: > >> > >> Can this feature be tested on 4.1

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

Hi, On 04/17/2013 11:37 AM, Guangjian Liu wrote: Thanks for your mail, you suggest compile libvirt with RBD enable. I already build libvirt-0.10.2.tar.gz as document http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/libvirt/ in my SERVER C(Ubuntu 12.04), Shall I build libvirt-0.10.2.tar.gz with RBD enable? use

physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Hi, While setting up the environment with the latest master code, the "createNetwork" API fails with this error message: "failed to create a guest network for basic zone Error: Specified physical network id is in incorrect state:Disabled". I checked the DB and found that in physical_network tab

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/ --- (Updated April 17, 2013, 11:09 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters

> On April 16, 2013, 3:12 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java, line 342 > > > > > > So this is available only at zone level and not at the global level is > > it ? By default e

VM with multiple nics connected to vpc n/w and isolated n/w - what is the usecase?

Currently I see that we allow VM to have multiple nics one in VPC n/w another in isolate network. Is there any use case for this? Thanks, SWAMY

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:52:08AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:10:01AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > > > > If it does not cost much, let's introduce a new dependency for requesting > > stuff (get or post etc.) using "requests" [1] for both marvin and > > cloudm

Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-1849 [AWS Style Health Checks] Creation of LB Health Check policy fails if the value of "Unhealthy Threshold" parameter is 3 or more.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10570/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy, Vijay Venkatachalam, and Ram Ganesh

devcloud hanging

<<< text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1: Unrecognized >>> <>

Re: devcloud hanging

On Apr 17, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > I tried both the devcloud and devcloud2 images. both seem to hang when > started with the default (xen) kernel. > I am running macosx 10.6.8 and virtualbox 4.2.12 > I enabled pae > > In both cases it hangs right after loading initial

Review Request: component tests:populate mode in the "services" dictionary from the network type in the list zones API response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10571/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- This

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

I still meet the same result. In ubuntu 12.04, 1. I install libvirt-dev as below, apt-get install libvirt-dev 2. rebuild libvirt, see detail build log in attach. root@ubuntu:~/install/libvirt-0.10.2# ./autogen.sh running CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/bash /bin/bash ./configure --enable-rbd --no-create --no

Re: Connection to http://repo.maven.apache.org refused

4.1 branch uses maven and there is not need to use the deps profile which is gone now. Looks like your command has -P deps, remove it. Next, looks like either there is some connectivity issue, either you're not connected to Internet, your DNS is unable to resolve the domain or the maven repo serve

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1851 [AWS Style Health Checks] Health Check monitor not getting created on Netscaler device in Basic zone setup.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10572/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy, Vijay Venkatachalam, and Ram Ganesh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 03:40 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: >> Thanks, David. >> It is not in the list of changes. > > Sorry about that. I pulled the changes from Jira and it had no "fix > versions" tagged, so it didn't show up in the list of things t

Re: devcloud hanging

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > I tried both the devcloud and devcloud2 images. both seem to hang when > started with the default (xen) kernel. > I am running macosx 10.6.8 and virtualbox 4.2.12 > I enabled pae > Don't enable PAE, importing devcloud2 from the ova

Re: database creator

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > I have some queries regarding Database Creator: > > Can this feature be tested on 4.1 ? > No, it's only in master. But starting 4.2, all ACS versions will have that until they will have dbcreator. For 4.1, we don't have rolling upgr

RE: Cloudstack 4.1

Hey Colm, You can find that information here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release We are not completely on the schedule at the moment, so I don't know the current date we expect the RC1 for 4.1, but it's around the corner. You track the progress on o

[ACS41][Patch Request]

commit 4d0a460bad05bfc89a9f2d93724221c7c517626e Author: Mice Xia Date: Wed Apr 17 21:24:33 2013 +0800 fix CLOUDSTACK 1991 CreateTagsCmd.java, DeleteTagsCmd.java, and ListTagsCmd.java all contain invalid version --- https://re

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:20:16AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 03:40 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Thanks, David. > >> It is not in the list of changes. > > > > Sorry about that. I pulled the changes from Jira

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:20:16AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 03:40 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: Thanks, David. It is not in the list of changes.

Re: VM with multiple nics connected to vpc n/w and isolated n/w - what is the usecase?

Its nice to have for migration, combined with the add/remove nic feature. That was actually the #1 reason I heard about people wanting the add/remove nic at the CS conference, to migrate between networks. Aside from that, I can't think of a reason not to allow it. I can draw up a few arbitrary scen

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

On 17 April 2013 17:10, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:52:08AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:10:01AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> > >> > >> > If it does not cost much, let's introduce a new dependency for requesting >> > stuff (get or post e

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:20:16AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013, at 03:40 PM, Wei Z

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

Hello, I'm -1 on the 4.0.2 release due to the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 our upgrade from version 2.2.13 to 4.0.x is blocked due this issue Regards. Le 16/04/2013 19:52, Joe Brockmeier a écrit : Hi All, I've created a 4.0.2 release, with the following artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 08:50 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Ok solved in 95f87bd96e0db0d061e37245166059d5eb7a073b > > But unfortunately I want to raise > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 which is a blocker > for 4.0.2 and yet still open. > > Nicolas emailed several times

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:36:20PM +0800, Mice Xia wrote: > commit 4d0a460bad05bfc89a9f2d93724221c7c517626e > Author: Mice Xia > Date: Wed Apr 17 21:24:33 2013 +0800 > > fix CLOUDSTACK 1991 CreateTagsCmd.java, DeleteTagsCmd.java, and > ListTagsCmd.java all contain invalid version > > -

Re: Review Request: component tests:populate mode in the "services" dictionary from the network type in the list zones API response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10571/#review19316 --- Ship it! 5ee3cc41fecb08b0dba16341fef12684a50ecc98 - Prasanna Santh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

Hello, Same as Nicolas, as we work together and it prohibits us from upgrading our production platform : I also vote -1 on the 4.0.2 release due to the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 Kind regards, Guillaume On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, wrote: > Hello, > I'm -1

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a time-based bug fix release from going out just because it doesn't fix every bug we know of, only if it introduces a bug. On Apr 17, 2013 8:09 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 08:50 AM, Sebastien Goasg

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

Yes, we have rules. :) A release will pass if it receives 3 binding +1 votes, and more +1 votes than -1 votes in total. On 17 April 2013 15:11, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a > time-based bug fix release from going out just becau

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:11:38AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a > time-based bug fix release from going out just because it doesn't fix every > bug we know of, only if it introduces a bug. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 09:11 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a > time-based bug fix release from going out just because it doesn't fix > every bug we know of, only if it introduces a bug. We don't have any hard and fast rules. It'

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 09:16 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 09:11 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a > > time-based bug fix release from going out just because it doesn't fix > > every bug we know of, only if

[CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 08:20 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > It does not seem to pass the rat test from the testing procedure: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure Based on this - I'm canceling the vote. Thanks to Sebastien for catching this. I

[ACS402] CLOUDSTACK-528 needs love! (Failed to create secondary storage)

Howdy all, As noted in the previous thread, we've stopped the vote on 4.0.2 due to another issue. I'm going to re-roll the release and start the vote again tomorrow. In the meantime, CLOUDSTACK-528 is a problem for at least one user trying to upgrade to 4.0.x. Can we get someone to take a look a

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:10:50PM +0200, Fraysse Guillaume wrote: > Hello, > > Same as Nicolas, as we work together and it prohibits us from > upgrading our production platform : I also vote -1 on the 4.0.2 > release due to the issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 > > >

Cancelling IRC meeting today

Hey all, Unless there's a strenuous objection, I'd like to cancel today's IRC meeting. We have a fair amount of work to do to get 4.1.0 out the door, and some cleanup on 4.0.2. It's probably more productive to work through the meeting time today. I'll send a status update on 4.0.2 in a few minute

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

OK, so the answer is no, we just decide as we go... On Apr 17, 2013 8:15 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:11:38AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Do we have rules set out around this? It seems that we wouldn't stop a > > time-based bug fix release from going out just beca

CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Hello guys, I'm testing an preproduction environment with cs4.0.0 onto centos 5.3. I'm testing a vpc environment. I'm asking why does the tier networks are limited to 200mb/s (network offering DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworksNoLB) ? So in xencenter, if i look at the network tab of m

[DOCS][ACS41] Status Update

Hey all, Just a quick update on the docs status. - Still working on release notes, in the final stretch now. I hope to have something ready to go out with the RC today or mid-day tomorrow. - We still have about 10 issues that can be fixed between now and a release candidate. CLOUDSTACK-1999 and

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2

It's a little more nuanced than that. ;) It's very possible that we would ship a new release that actually introduces known bugs. It is much less likely that we would ship a release that introduces known critical bugs. In the end, it is up to the community to decide. And that is a process of a rele

[ACS402] Status Update

Current status on 4.0.2: - Have stopped the first VOTE and will restart tomorrow. - In addition to CLOUDSTACK-528, we have a few other bugs that could still be attended to if anyone has the time. These are not blockers, but if you have the interest in taking a look, please do! * CLOUDSTACK-643:

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

There's another one in reviewboard: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/ Summary: CLOUDSTACK-1894 User is not able to deploy VMs in a project[permission denied to access the guest network) 2013/4/17 Chip Childers > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:36:20PM +0800, Mice Xia wrote: > > commit 4d0a460bad

Re: [DOCS][ACS41] Status Update

On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > Just a quick update on the docs status. > > - Still working on release notes, in the final stretch now. I hope to > have something ready to go out with the RC today or mid-day tomorrow. > > - We still have about 10 issues that

Re: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Hi Sanjay, You have to enable the physical network explicitly after its creation if you configure CS using APIs. Here is the example of the command: http://localhost:8096/?command=updatePhysicalNetwork&id=&state=Enable d The cloudStack UI automatically does this call for you as the last step of

Virtual Routers Failover

Hi List. I've experienced some erratic behavior when when setting a host in maintenance mode: I had about 6 Virtual routers running and 2 system vms in a given host , after putting this host in maintenance mode the system vms failed over successfully. The problem came in when the VirtualRouter

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

hi, the default value of network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate is 200mbps, you can change it in global setting. Restart management server and network. best, wei 2013/4/17, benoit lair : > Hello guys, > > > I'm testing an preproduction environment with cs4.0.0 onto centos 5.3. > >

Re: CS 4.0.1 | KVM | CentOS 6.3

No the management IP hasn't changed. My question is why when restarting Cloud Management the issue is cleared up. Then almost an hour later, it starts in again; how do I correct this issue? On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Did the management server ip change? It someho

Re: database creator

In my opinion, rolling upgrade may not be an accurate term here for this task. In my previous experience, rolling upgrade is defined as a upgrade process that allows users to keep their existing distributed system running while they upgrade each system gradually. I don't think that this is the case

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

You can change it on the network offering level (networkRate parameter). Create a new network offering with the desired network rate, and upgrade your existing network to the new offering. The advantage of this approach over the global config parameter change is - the global config change will affe

Re: deployDataCenter.py doesn't work for me on master

I copied the vhd-util from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util to scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vhd-util in the tree, but it did not resolve my issue. (The problem is not with the functionality of the vhd-util but a path problem. I get that the vhd-util should be updated and

RE: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

Thanks Prasanna. It was indeed the problem with my service offerings - I had memory requirement set to 124.00 MB not below 64 MB. When I increased it to 200 MB , I don't see the problem anymore. I have always used a service offering with 124.00 MB before on Xenserver 6.0.2 and did not encounter

Re: CS 4.0.1 | KVM | CentOS 6.3

You probably have another MS connecting to the same database? On 4/17/13 9:49 AM, "Maurice Lawler" wrote: >No the management IP hasn't changed. My question is why when restarting >Cloud Management the issue is cleared up. Then almost an hour later, it >starts in again; how do I correct this issu

RE: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Enhanced Baremetal support for Cisco UCS

Hi Parth, The test plan look good to me. Thanks, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Parth Jagirdar [mailto:parth.jagir...@citrix.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:00 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org (dev@cloudstack.apache.org) >Subject: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Enhanced Baremetal s

Re: database creator

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:49:53AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > In my opinion, rolling upgrade may not be an accurate term here for this > task. In my previous experience, rolling upgrade is defined as a upgrade > process that allows users to keep their existing distributed system > running while they

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1894 User is not able to deploy VMs in a project[permission denied to access the guest network)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/ --- (Updated April 17, 2013, 5:21 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil

Re: inheritable componentContexts

On 4/16/13 11:55 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 09:43:47AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >> >> >> On 4/16/13 1:15 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >> >> >This is probably a question for the Spring community but I'll ask here >> >anyway. Every so often when the component

[MERGE] Mixed zone management

Hello, I would like to merge down the 'mixed zone management' support: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-738 This adds a new drop-down to the top of the UI to filter out zones by type - either 'Basic' 'Advanced' or by both basic + advanced (the default). This allows a better wor

[MERGE] Mixed zone management

[Re-sending, accidentally sent to the old incubator list before due to e-mail client autocorrect :)] Hello, I would like to merge down the 'mixed zone management' support: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-738 This adds a new drop-down to the top of the UI to filter out zones by

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1894 User is not able to deploy VMs in a project[permission denied to access the guest network)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/#review19329 --- Commit abbe8ce71fdd96220bc0c7abfb08f7ea00fcb1d0 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1894 User is not able to deploy VMs in a project[permission denied to access the guest network)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/#review19330 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 17, 2013, 5:21 p.m.,

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:27:17PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Thanks, here's one more related to it... > > commit 2057221f4f1fd5afde422b367fc416d4e44275cb > Author: Marcus Sorensen > Date: Tue Apr 16 22:18:38 2013 -0600 > > CLOUDSTACK-2051 - The previous patch ensures that holes in d

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:55:16PM +0800, Mice Xia wrote: > There's another one in reviewboard: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/ > Summary: > CLOUDSTACK-1894 User is not able to deploy VMs in a project[permission > denied to access the guest network) Done

Re: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:25:56AM -0700, Brian Federle wrote: > [Re-sending, accidentally sent to the old incubator list before due to e-mail > client autocorrect :)] > > Hello, > > I would like to merge down the 'mixed zone management' support: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTA

[ACS41] Status Update

Hi all, Here's where we stand on ACS 4.1: One new blocker opened by Marcus today (which he assigned to himself): CLOUDSTACK-2067 KVM virtual machines can fail to start but CS thinks they are running We also need to complete the release notes / upgrade instructions. AFAIK, that's it. So once w

RE: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

Sorry, I'm confused as to what is missing in my merge request. From the wiki: "Send an email with a "[MERGE]" tag in the subject line to the dev list. It's useful to point to the design doc on the wiki, the jira record for the work, and any of the critical discussions that talk about the change

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

Would be great if it passes pep8 also.(just my nitpicky self) On 4/17/13 6:49 AM, "prasanna" wrote: >On 17 April 2013 17:10, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:52:08AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:10:01AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> > >>

Re: database creator

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Min Chen wrote: > In my opinion, rolling upgrade may not be an accurate term here for this > task. In my previous experience, rolling upgrade is defined as a upgrade > process that allows users to keep their existing distributed system > running while they upgrad

Re: devcloud hanging

It used to work for me (back in Jan). Now I'm on 10.8. Some old macbook's have the 32-bit version of OSX and I think they cannot run DevCloud/DevCloud2 From: Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.ap

Re: [ACS41] Status Update

I'm testing the fix for that now. Also, this fix revealed an upstream bug in the management server. There is a path in advanceStart that can allow it to complete and return a null object without having successfully started the VM. The caller of this method (the orch service) doesn't care about the

Re: CS 4.0.1 | KVM | CentOS 6.3

No. I have ONE server running. One MS - One Install of CS - One of everything. All on the same IP address. On Apr 17, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > You probably have another MS connecting to the same database? > > On 4/17/13 9:49 AM, "Maurice Lawler" wrote: > >> No the man

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

yes, you can limit network rate of certain type of networks according to Alena's approach. Maybe we also need to limit the network rate of "VMs" in certain networks? 2013/4/17 Alena Prokharchyk > You can change it on the network offering level (networkRate parameter). > Create a new network off

Re: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Change Account Membership CS-1390

Addition, Verification for successful Move should include following (Applicable to all move test cases):: 1) Ensure VM is functional (Start, Stop and Access) 2) Ensure old owner doesn't have access to it anymore. ŠParth On 4/15/13 10:17 PM, "Parth Jagirdar" wrote: >All, > >Test Plan @ >h

RE: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

Nevermind, I figured it out I think, I'll submit a review board request for this. -Brian -Original Message- From: Brian Federle Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:40 AM To: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org' Cc: Sonny Chhen; Jessica Wang; Pranav Saxena; Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: RE: [MERGE]

Re: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:11:37AM -0700, Brian Federle wrote: > Nevermind, I figured it out I think, I'll submit a review board request for > this. No no, please don't bother doing that! Give me a few more mins to look through things (in a meeting right now). > > -Brian > > -Original Mes

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

I've located the detailed article on how to setup the network throttling in cloudStack: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX132019 The approaches base on the Network type (Guest,Public,Control) and vmType (VR/UserVm/SSVM) We might need to add it to Apache Wiki. -Alena. On 4/17/13 11:09 AM, "

RE: [QA][ACS42] Test Plan for Change Account Membership CS-1390

Parth, As part of verification after the change in ownership is done , can you include the following checks: 1. New owner is able to start the Vm successfully. 2. Original owner is not able to list this Vm. 3. Vm is not part of the original isolated network anymore and cannot be accessed from o

Re: devcloud hanging

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > It used to work for me (back in Jan). Now I'm on 10.8. > Some old macbook's have the 32-bit version of OSX and I think they cannot > run DevCloud/DevCloud2 > DevCloud old and newer both are x86 based and c

Re: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

Here's the content of a great MERGE email that Likitha sent. No need for the reviewboard entry, since you're a committer! Just an update that tells us what to diff against to see the branch vs. master. > Hi all, > > I would like to merge the feature Dedicate Public IP ranges to master. > > Jira

RE: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering

Hi Nitin, Thanks for the feedback. I have added comments inline. -Prachi -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:42 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via Ser

Fwd: createAsync Question

Meant to send this out to the entire list, so others could hear what Edison has to say, as well. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mike Tutkowski Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM Subject: Re: createAsync Question To: Edison Su Ah, I remember our discussion about that more now.

  1   2   >