removing
> > > haproxy), and see if the problem persists?
> > >
> > > Is your Galera cluster healthy? Could you be seeing latency on commit?
> > >
> > >
> > > ________
> > > From: Andrija Panic
>
f the problem persists?
> >
> > Is your Galera cluster healthy? Could you be seeing latency on commit?
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Andrija Panic
> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 7:42 AM
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apach
ne 8, 2015 7:42 AM
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [HELP needed] haproxy vs mysql client timeout
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running into intermittent problems with ACS 4.5.1 mgmt server - it
> seems it's loosing connection to the haproxy/m
...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [HELP needed] haproxy vs mysql client timeout
Hi,
I'm running into intermittent problems with ACS 4.5.1 mgmt server - it
seems it's loosing connection to the haproxy/mysql, since we are using
haproxy VIP to in db.properties
Hi,
I'm running into intermittent problems with ACS 4.5.1 mgmt server - it
seems it's loosing connection to the haproxy/mysql, since we are using
haproxy VIP to in db.properties, and this haproxy is using 1 galera node in
the backend section...(2 others are backup etc).
haproxy timeout is 100sec
anic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 15 April 2015 16:39
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to update - issue solved
e same.
>
> Regards
> Sadhu
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2015 16:39
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM a
: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
Hi guys,
just to update - issue solved:
Deleted the 5th row, so only 4 additional rows left (as original keystore table
layout prior to replacing certificate)
The problem was actually, while URL encoding ROOT CA and Intermediate CA, the
plus
gt; )
>
> Regards
> Sadhu
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 April 2015 23:19
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and S
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
Thanks Suresh.
2 identical sequence numbers means: first occurence is OLD Intermediate
CA(from 1 year ago), and the second occurence is the new one just uploaded (it
happened I
adhu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 April 2015 22:56
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
>
> Hi Lucian
>
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2015 22:56
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
Hi Lucian
yes it is *.domain.com (from 4.3.1 onwards)...
I
..@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 7 April, 2015 17:42:35
> > Subject: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > our SSL just expired, and I needed to upload new ROOT CA, Intemediata
> ROOT
>
ic"
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 April, 2015 17:42:35
> Subject: {HELP-NEEDED] Replace Root CA etc, for CPVM and SSVM
> Hi guys,
>
> our SSL just expired, and I needed to upload new ROOT CA, Intemediata ROOT
> CA, and at
Hi guys,
our SSL just expired, and I needed to upload new ROOT CA, Intemediata ROOT
CA, and at the end SSL for sever and a private key.
I uploaded new ROOT CA, and after CPVM rebooted, also uploaded Intermediate
ROOT CA, via API, with URL encoded stuff - checked in database all seems OK.
But aft
> From: "Andrija Panic"
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2015 21:25:24
> > Subject: Re: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
>
> > I would be very glad to see this patch/imrovement.
> >
> > Since it
, 16 March, 2015 21:25:24
> Subject: Re: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
> I would be very glad to see this patch/imrovement.
>
> Since it seems that I hit this problem 5-6 months ago (when we tried to
> move instance to assign it to another account, and that failed) -but I
> never de
6:00:00:97"
> > >> >> >> > "46.232.180.181" "255.255.255.0" "46.232.180.1" "Ip4"
> > "vlan://500"
> > >> >> "212"
> > >> >> >> > "Dhcp" "Deallo
t; >> > 11:06:56" "vlan://500" \N "0" "User" "2014-09-02 09:03:11"
> >> "2014-09-02
> >> >> >> > 09:06:56" \N \N "0" "1"
> >> >> >> > "2897" "aab5d28
quot;Create" "DirectNetworkGuru" \N "1"
> >> "2014-09-02
> >> >> >> > 11:06:56" "vlan://500" \N "0" "User" "2014-09-02 09:03:11"
> >> "2014-09-02
> >> >> >>
t; > "Dhcp" "Deallocating" "Create" "DirectNetworkGuru" \N "1"
>>> "2014-09-02
>>> >> >> > 11:06:56" "vlan://500" \N "0" "User" "2014-09-02 09:03:11"
>>&g
t; "2014-09-02
>> >> >> > 09:06:56" \N \N "0" "1"
>> >> >> > "2897" "aab5d282-e9d5-4c4f-91c9-bfae88f404d6" "1304"
>> >> "06:6e:0c:00:00:9c"
>> >> >> > "46.232.180.186" &q
ot;DirectNetworkGuru" \N "0" "2015-02-11
> >> >> 14:32:00"
> >> >> > "vlan://500" \N "0" "User" "2015-02-11 13:31:59" \N \N \N "0" "1"
> >> >> > "2235" &quo
t;0" "User" "2015-02-11 13:31:59" \N \N \N "0" "1"
>> >> > "2235" "30865e2e-083e-4e8a-bccf-c24bf403dece" "1488"
>> "06:b8:b4:00:00:a1"
>> >> > "46.232.180.191" "255.25
t;User" "2014-12-02 13:31:08" "2014-12-02
> >> > 13:58:11" \N \N "0" "1"
> >> > "2642" "233d03e4-360f-4bbe-8b9c-882468bc9c7b" "1706"
> "06:f8:36:00:00:a7"
> >> > "46.232.180.
quot; \N \N "0" "1"
>> > "2642" "233d03e4-360f-4bbe-8b9c-882468bc9c7b" "1706" "06:f8:36:00:00:a7"
>> > "46.232.180.197" "255.255.255.0" "46.232.180.1" "Ip4" "vlan://500" &qu
;212"
> "Dhcp" "Deallocating" "Create" "DirectNetworkGuru" \N "1" "2015-01-21
> 19:46:10" "vlan://500" \N "0" "User" "2015-01-21 17:27:13" "2015-01-21
> 18:46:10&quo
t;
> > "46.232.180.197" "255.255.255.0" "46.232.180.1" "Ip4" "vlan://500" "212"
> > "Dhcp" "Deallocating" "Create" "DirectNetworkGuru" \N "1" "2015-01-21
> > 19:46:10" "vla
7d4937020" "1102" "06:ac:4e:00:00:54"
"46.232.180.205" "255.255.255.0" "46.232.180.1" "Ip4" "vlan://500" "212"
"Dhcp" "Deallocating" "Create" "DirectNetworkGuru" \N "1&qu
t;> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Andrija Panic"
>>> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.ap
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Andrija Panic"
>> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Sunday, 15
c"
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Sunday, 15 March, 2015 16:19:07
> > Subject: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right
> before
> >
16:19:07
> Subject: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
> Hi guys,
>
> we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right before
> that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
>
> And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used for SHARED GUEST network
> anymore.
> And some V
Hi Laszlo,
here is the mgmt log:
http://pastebin.com/3Zt4EDfM
I found a strange line in the middle of the long exception stuff:
- at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy240.startRouter(Unknown Source)
As far as I can see, by the mounting secondary storage /template/2/615/
folder in the agent logs - this is
Hi Andrija,
Could you also share management server logs?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right before
> that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
>
> And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used
irt packages?
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Andrija Panic"
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent:
5 March, 2015 16:19:07
> Subject: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
> Hi guys,
>
> we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right before
> that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
>
> And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used for SHARED GUEST network
> any
Hi guys,
we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right before
that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used for SHARED GUEST network
anymore.
And some VMs are down - and cant be started because they depend on this
VR...
VPC VRs are c
No idea, it's been mostly off of my radar. I just happened to try to
test a few fixes and 4.2 was having problems with local storage. At
the least I'd say it's not a good idea for someone to use it (or any
non-production version) right now if they're setting up cloudstack for
the first time.
On W
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not
> sure if that is related.
The master / 4.2 quality seems to be churning a ton... this isn't a
good sign IMO. Did we cram in too much at the end again?
Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not
sure if that is related.
On Aug 7, 2013 1:32 PM, "Sarath Chandra"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could
> not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if
Hi All,
Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could
not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if it helps. But I
seem to be going wrong in some place.
Can some one kinldy go though the below setup and tell me if its right. I
am stuck since a week trying
@cloudstack.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen
Subject: Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
Great stuff, thanks Prasanna!
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> I think Citrix has done this, at least that's why comes out of the db now:
>
> |
> http://download.cloud.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>> Why would your primary (local) storage have a different IP than
> > > host-corporate-ip?
> > > >>> There is also a flag system.vm
gt;
> > >>> From: Sarath Chandra > sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com>>
> > >>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> > mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> > >>> Date: Tuesday
t; >>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM
> >>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org&g
ot;dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>>> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM
>>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>>> mailto:dev@cloudst
;dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM
>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
>> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.or
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate any
> VMs (both sys
.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
H
Hi All,
I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate
any VMs (both system & guest vms). I am seeing the following errors:
ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c)
ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[2-1-null-null-null
Ntwk[202|Control|3]
CloudStack 101? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-101.html
> -Original Message-
> From: gaurav jain [mailto:tashan1...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 02 July 2013 5:29 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: help needed
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I am complete
Hello Everyone,
I am completely new to cloudstack, to be more precise
I am completely new to how these cloud services work.
How should I begin with this? Moreover I have to give
a project proposal on a project on cloudstack, for which I
need to start with it.
Thank You
Gaurav
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:52:08AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Kelven:
>
> Any chance you can help with this? If not, anyone you'd recommend to
> pick this up?
>
> --David
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers w
Kelven:
Any chance you can help with this? If not, anyone you'd recommend to
pick this up?
--David
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> CLOUDSTACK-2064 - "The Vmware template dosent have permissions to be
>> c
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> CLOUDSTACK-2064 - "The Vmware template dosent have permissions to be
> copied from secondary storage."
>
> I need someone to grab this one and work on resolving it please!
>
> -chip
Help is still needed on this bug. Anyone care to
CLOUDSTACK-2064 - "The Vmware template dosent have permissions to be
copied from secondary storage."
I need someone to grab this one and work on resolving it please!
-chip
CLOUDSTACK-528 is a problem that's blocking upgrades for 2.x.
Help needed from someone familiar enough with this, and perhaps with an
environment to replication and retest.
Interesting log lines:
2013-05-03 15:10:22,351 WARN [storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource]
(TP-Processor21
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like we are still having troubles with the upgrade path for 2.x to
> 4.1.0. It may just be a documentation issue, but I would love if
> someone could step up and figure out if (1) the docs are wrong, or (2)
> if we have a
Hi all,
Looks like we are still having troubles with the upgrade path for 2.x to
4.1.0. It may just be a documentation issue, but I would love if
someone could step up and figure out if (1) the docs are wrong, or (2)
if we have a code bug.
This is related to the systemvm upgrade that's required
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:10:11PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> The DB version is set to 4.1.0 on my dev systems, so I think somehow the
> SNAPSHOT was added to the db version only when we hit 4.1.1.
>
> I think it makes sense to roll back to your 4.1.0 if/when possible, that
> way if we need w
The DB version is set to 4.1.0 on my dev systems, so I think somehow the
SNAPSHOT was added to the db version only when we hit 4.1.1.
I think it makes sense to roll back to your 4.1.0 if/when possible, that
way if we need work on the RC we can without rolling forward and back each
time the vote fa
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:01:30PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> So if I understand correctly, when the vote fails it will auto revert so we
> can work on the 4.1 branch again? For the moment it's kind of stuck in
> limbo, but maybe that's how it's meant to be. I suppose we work on the
> branch f
So if I understand correctly, when the vote fails it will auto revert so we
can work on the 4.1 branch again? For the moment it's kind of stuck in
limbo, but maybe that's how it's meant to be. I suppose we work on the
branch from the commit where the RC was cut, and then apply any patches
after the
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:55:11PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0
> > completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with
> > this, and then fi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:50:52PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0
> completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with
> this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to
> 4.1.1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0
> completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with
> this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to
> 4.1.1-SNAPSHO
Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0
completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with
this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to
4.1.1-SNAPSHOT.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Yup
Yup - The script I used to update versions was incomplete. Fixed and
will attempt the process again now.
Thanks Mice!
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> chip,
>
> in tools/apidoc/pom.xml
> -
> ../../client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/
> +
> ../../client/target
chip,
in tools/apidoc/pom.xml
-
../../client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.1.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/
+
../../client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.1.1-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/
-mice
2013/4/22 Chip Childers
> I was about to release the RC for voting, when I hit an error building
> from the 4.1 branch via the follow
I was about to release the RC for voting, when I hit an error building
from the 4.1 branch via the following command:
mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install
Does anyone know what's going wrong here?
Snipped output below:
[INFO] -
Thanks. Applied to master as well.
-min
On 4/12/13 11:56 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:40:35AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
>> Chip, patch for CLOUDSTACK-1987 is submitted for review:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10432/.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -min
>
>Applied! Please make sure
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:40:35AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Chip, patch for CLOUDSTACK-1987 is submitted for review:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10432/.
>
> Thanks
> -min
Applied! Please make sure it gets into master.
commit dd486efb77d2dad63991975fd06d033dfa8db445
Author: Min Chen
Date:
>> >> >Hi Ryan,
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes Sure, my bad, will look at the patch first.
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Prachi
>> >> >
>> >> >-Original Message-
>> >> >From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
>> >> >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:46 PM
>> >> >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >Subject: Re: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
>> >> >
>> >> >Could you look at this first?
>> >> >
>> >> >https://reviews.apache.org/r/10426/
>> >> >
>> >> >On Apr 11, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Prachi Damle
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
; wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Ryan,
> >> >
> >> >Yes Sure, my bad, will look at the patch first.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Prachi
> >> >
> >> >-Original Message-
> >> >From: Ryan Dietrich
On 12/04/13 2:41 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
>CLOUDSTACK-1934 NPE with listSupportedNetworkServices after upgrade from
>4.0 to 4.1 (Ubuntu MS)
>Unassigned
Submitted patch for 1934.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:11:23PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need your help clearing out the following bugs... if you have one
> assigned to you, please see if you can get it completed. If you have
> any time available, and think you can help resolve one of the unassigned
> one
t;>
>> On 4/11/13 5:52 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Ryan,
>> >
>> >Yes Sure, my bad, will look at the patch first.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Prachi
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >Fro
achi
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:46 PM
> >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
> >
> >Could you look at this
Sure, my bad, will look at the patch first.
>
>Thanks,
>Prachi
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:46 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [ACS41] Help needed clearing b
Hi Ryan,
Yes Sure, my bad, will look at the patch first.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
Could you look at this
pril 11, 2013 5:17 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
>
> Probably, it's a setup issue, e.g openvswitch doesn't work. I'll take a look
> QA's environment, if it's still there.
>
>> -Original Mess
I will take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1987.
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 5:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
Probably, it's a setup issue, e.g openvswitch do
tack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Help needed clearing bugs!
>
> I haven't even touched openvswitch, or I'd take a look at 1978. Is that a
> prerequisite for duplicating the issue?
> On Apr 11, 2013 3:41 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>
> > about CLOUDSTAC
I haven't even touched openvswitch, or I'd take a look at 1978. Is that a
prerequisite for duplicating the issue?
On Apr 11, 2013 3:41 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
> about CLOUDSTACK-1978, it looks like the problem at hypervsor host side,
> the hypervisor host is either failed to setup the VNC listen
I believe I have a fix for CLOUDSTACK-1987.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10426/
On Apr 11, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> about CLOUDSTACK-1978, it looks like the problem at hypervsor host side,
> the hypervisor host is either failed to setup the VNC listening interface
> or failed to c
about CLOUDSTACK-1978, it looks like the problem at hypervsor host side,
the hypervisor host is either failed to setup the VNC listening interface
or failed to configure firewall properly, could KVM developer pick this
up(I assume it is KVM hypervisor)?
Kelven
On 4/11/13 2:11 PM, "Chip Childers"
Hi all,
I need your help clearing out the following bugs... if you have one
assigned to you, please see if you can get it completed. If you have
any time available, and think you can help resolve one of the unassigned
ones, please jump in! We're obviously behind the schedule that we set
for our
88 matches
Mail list logo
