On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:50:52PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Why is the HEAD of 4.1 branch now on 4.1.1? Don't we need a stable 4.1.0 > completed first, before we break 4.1? I ran into several issues today with > this, and then finally now there's not a database upgrade from 4.1.0 to > 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT.
I advanced it, but will revert and then re-advance it when the VOTE closes. I figured that a history of 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT > 4.1.0 > 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT was the most logical thing to do. That being said, yes, we need to get the DB upgrade in place I guess. Should I revert the 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT to 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT?
