Re: Travis failing on test 'test_project_limits'

e.org Subject: Travis failing on test 'test_project_limits' Hi, Folks. I have seen PRs with Travis failing on test 'test_project_limits'. Some of those PRs are the following: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2275 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2274 https://git

Travis failing on test 'test_project_limits'

Hi, Folks. I have seen PRs with Travis failing on test 'test_project_limits'. Some of those PRs are the following: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2275 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2274 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2270 https://github.com/apache/

Re: Travis failing on PRs

Yadav Sent: 11 July 2017 17:20:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Travis failing on PRs All, Please see: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2017-06-19-trusty-updates-2017-Q2 <https://blog.travis-ci.com/2017-06-19-trusty-updates-2017-Q2>OracleJDK7 is no longer supported by Travis, s

Travis failing on PRs

All, Please see: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2017-06-19-trusty-updates-2017-Q2 OracleJDK7 is no longer supported by Travis, switching to oraclejdk7 yields error. Please help review and merge before 4.10 branch is cut and master is

Re: Travis Failing

, >>> >>> Rohit Yadav >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Will Stevens [mailto:wi

Re: Travis Failing

ondon WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 2:01 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Travis Failing >> >> I am not sure wh

Re: Travis Failing

Saturday, April 9, 2016 2:01 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Travis Failing > > I am not sure who has control of travis and how that works. I have not > had a chance to get my head into that aspect yet. > > Can someone have a look at the following issue which seems to

RE: Travis Failing

, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 2:01 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Travis Failing I am not sure who has control of travis and how that works. I have not had a chance to get my

Re: Travis Failing

Thanks for the clarification seb. That helps me understand how to troubleshoot this. I am open to others helping me troubleshoot this though. Any takers? ;) On Apr 8, 2016 4:50 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > Will, the way travis works is that it reads what is in .travis.yml at the > root of o

Re: Travis Failing

Will, the way travis works is that it reads what is in .travis.yml at the root of our repo. If you check it, you will see that it uses scripts in /tools to make a fresh build of the simulator, start the simulator and run the tests. Everyone who has a fork will end up with Travis runs in their t

Travis Failing

I am not sure who has control of travis and how that works. I have not had a chance to get my head into that aspect yet. Can someone have a look at the following issue which seems to be happening to a bunch of travis builds right now. Requirement 'tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-*.tar.gz' looks like a

RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

. Everything was tested using the Simulator and my environment: Cheers, Wilder From: Wilder Rodrigues Sent: donderdag 11 september 2014 11:25 To: 'Ian Duffy' Cc: CloudStack Dev; int-toolkit; int-cloud Subject: RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 Hi Ian, One job is fixed. What happened? I

RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

bothering you with that, I will fix it. Cheers, Wilder From: Wilder Rodrigues Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:44 PM To: 'Ian Duffy' Cc: CloudStack Dev; int-toolkit; int-cloud Subject: RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 Okay… I’m cloning it in a different place, just to m

RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

Rodrigues Cc: CloudStack Dev; int-toolkit; int-cloud Subject: Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 > You clone the “test-cmd-rebase” branch, right? Yes positive: $ git status On branch test-cmd-rebase Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/test-cmd-rebase'. Try your work against

Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

gt; > I executed the first set of tests travis does and seen some failures: > > === TestName: test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Status : EXCEPTION === > > === TestName: test_deployvm_firstfit | Status : EXCEPTION === > > === TestName: test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Status : EXCEPTI

RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

35 To: Wilder Rodrigues Cc: CloudStack Dev; int-toolkit; int-cloud Subject: Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 HI Wilder, I cloned your branch, compiled it and ran it in simulator mode. mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run -D simulator I browsed about the UI for a bit, I seen an exception

Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

:i...@ianduffy.ie] > *Sent:* woensdag 10 september 2014 9:05 > *To:* CloudStack Dev > *Cc:* int-toolkit; int-cloud > *Subject:* Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 > > > > Hi Wilder, > > > > The travis stuff is experimental. > > > > I will take

RE: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

] Sent: woensdag 10 september 2014 9:05 To: CloudStack Dev Cc: int-toolkit; int-cloud Subject: Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18 Hi Wilder, The travis stuff is experimental. I will take a look at this for you and see if its anything to be concerned about. Thanks, Ian On 10 September

Re: [TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

Hi Wilder, The travis stuff is experimental. I will take a look at this for you and see if its anything to be concerned about. Thanks, Ian On 10 September 2014 07:00, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: > Hi guys, > > Last night I sent a pull request, after rebasing and fixing some conflicts > in Virtua

[TRAVIS] - failing for pull request #18

Hi guys, Last night I sent a pull request, after rebasing and fixing some conflicts in VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl class. Unfortunately, the 3 builds are not okay on Travis. For the first job, I got the following: Still running (30 of 30): ./tools/travis/before_script.sh Timeout (30 mi