it could be per cluster or per host (local storage) at the moment. I
believe after the storage refactor work happens is when support for zone
wide primary *might* become a reality.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Is primary storage zone wide too?
>
>
>
> On
Thanks.
Is primary storage zone wide too?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Secondary storage is zone wide not pod-specific.
> Pod2 probably has some problems (enough shared storage perhaps?). The MS
> logs should indicate the problem.
>
Secondary storage is zone wide not pod-specific.
Pod2 probably has some problems (enough shared storage perhaps?). The MS
logs should indicate the problem.
On 4/11/13 7:03 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote:
>just to clarify I'm using KVM.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jeronimo Garci
just to clarify I'm using KVM.
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Thanks for your answer .
> System vms images are normally in secondary storage , and currently i
> have 3 pods and one and only secondary storage nfs system,
>
> When i shut down all the se
Hi.
Thanks for your answer .
System vms images are normally in secondary storage , and currently i have
3 pods and one and only secondary storage nfs system,
When i shut down all the servers on POD1 , the system vms refused to
launch in pod2 , would it be cause Pod2 has to have it's own second
System VMs are tend to be running in stateless mode, instead of fail-over
of same VM, we are launching new instance of them, this behave is done for
storage and console proxy system VM, for virtual router system VM, there
is a redundant configuration, automatic HA would make the redundant
configura
Is this on vSphere?
For other hypervisors, theoretically HA can start it on other clusters
(since the control ip is link local). But if there is capacity available
on the first cluster, why not restart it on the original cluster?
On 4/11/13 7:54 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote:
>Anyone ever bumped
Anyone ever bumped into this yet?
Thanks!
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now , system vms can
> only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore pod.
>
> I'm guessing this is because the
Hi List.
Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now , system vms can
only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore pod.
I'm guessing this is because the system vm is using a management ip
assigned to that specific pod.
Is there any HA offering that could make syste
