Thanks. Is primary storage zone wide too?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Secondary storage is zone wide not pod-specific. > Pod2 probably has some problems (enough shared storage perhaps?). The MS > logs should indicate the problem. > > On 4/11/13 7:03 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >just to clarify I'm using KVM. > > > >Thanks! > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jeronimo Garcia > ><garciaj...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> Thanks for your answer . > >> System vms images are normally in secondary storage , and currently i > >> have 3 pods and one and only secondary storage nfs system, > >> > >> When i shut down all the servers on POD1 , the system vms refused to > >> launch in pod2 , would it be cause Pod2 has to have it's own secondary > >> storage. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Kelven Yang > >><kelven.y...@citrix.com>wrote: > >> > >>> System VMs are tend to be running in stateless mode, instead of > >>>fail-over > >>> of same VM, we are launching new instance of them, this behave is done > >>>for > >>> storage and console proxy system VM, for virtual router system VM, > >>>there > >>> is a redundant configuration, automatic HA would make the redundant > >>> configuration unstable. so in general, system VMs don't use HA offering > >>> purposely. > >>> > >>> Kelven > >>> > >>> On 4/11/13 7:54 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> >Anyone ever bumped into this yet? > >>> > > >>> >Thanks! > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeronimo Garcia > >>> ><garciaj...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi List. > >>> >> > >>> >> Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now , system > >>>vms > >>> >>can > >>> >> only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore pod. > >>> >> > >>> >> I'm guessing this is because the system vm is using a management ip > >>> >> assigned to that specific pod. > >>> >> > >>> >> Is there any HA offering that could make system VMs to failover to > >>> >> different pods/clusters? > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks! > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
