it could be per cluster or per host (local storage) at the moment. I believe after the storage refactor work happens is when support for zone wide primary *might* become a reality.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Jeronimo Garcia <garciaj...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks. > > Is primary storage zone wide too? > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > Secondary storage is zone wide not pod-specific. > > Pod2 probably has some problems (enough shared storage perhaps?). The MS > > logs should indicate the problem. > > > > On 4/11/13 7:03 PM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >just to clarify I'm using KVM. > > > > > >Thanks! > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jeronimo Garcia > > ><garciaj...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> Hi. > > >> > > >> Thanks for your answer . > > >> System vms images are normally in secondary storage , and currently i > > >> have 3 pods and one and only secondary storage nfs system, > > >> > > >> When i shut down all the servers on POD1 , the system vms refused to > > >> launch in pod2 , would it be cause Pod2 has to have it's own > secondary > > >> storage. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Kelven Yang > > >><kelven.y...@citrix.com>wrote: > > >> > > >>> System VMs are tend to be running in stateless mode, instead of > > >>>fail-over > > >>> of same VM, we are launching new instance of them, this behave is > done > > >>>for > > >>> storage and console proxy system VM, for virtual router system VM, > > >>>there > > >>> is a redundant configuration, automatic HA would make the redundant > > >>> configuration unstable. so in general, system VMs don't use HA > offering > > >>> purposely. > > >>> > > >>> Kelven > > >>> > > >>> On 4/11/13 7:54 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" <garciaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> >Anyone ever bumped into this yet? > > >>> > > > >>> >Thanks! > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> >On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeronimo Garcia > > >>> ><garciaj...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >> Hi List. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now , system > > >>>vms > > >>> >>can > > >>> >> only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore > pod. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> I'm guessing this is because the system vm is using a management > ip > > >>> >> assigned to that specific pod. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Is there any HA offering that could make system VMs to failover to > > >>> >> different pods/clusters? > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Thanks! > > >>> >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
