Re: test file sticking around

thanks guys, I did it in an @After-method anyway to make sure it still gets cleaned on exceptions. enjoy https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2384 On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 remove after test finishes. > > > > - Rohit > > > > > >

Re: test file sticking around

+1 remove after test finishes. - Rohit From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 7:17:04 PM To: dev Subject: test file sticking around devs, This has been bugging me but not enough to tackle: a file named 'service

Re: test file sticking around

+1 for removal. Do you need to do this in the @After? If it is a single test method that is creating this file, why not delete it after the assertions? On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > devs, > > This has been bugging me but not enough to tackle: a file named > 'services/se

RE: Test failure on master?

Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Simon Weller Subject: Re: Test failure on master? I can't point to this PR for this, but I have noticed an increase in random failures in my CI runs since this code has gone in. I have not tracked it down to this, but resourc

RE: Test failure on master?

alf Of Will Stevens Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Simon Weller Subject: Re: Test failure on master? Rohit, I have seen quite a few issues with this feature so far. The change you made in #1538 does not change the actual code at all, it just reduces the num

Re: Test failure on master?

the issue on OSX. >> >> Regards. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rohit Yadav >> >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >> www.shapeblue.com >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK >> @shapeblue >> >> -Original Message- &

Re: Test failure on master?

ginal Message----- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:49 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Test failure on master? > > I don't have OSX, but it seems to be working on Travis and Linux env in > general.

RE: Test failure on master?

] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:49 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Test failure on master? I don't have OSX, but it seems to be working on Travis and Linux env in general. I'll send a PR that relaxes malicious client attacks, and ask you to review in your env -- Koushi

RE: Test failure on master?

ent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 12:22 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Test failure on master? I am also seeing the same failure happening randomly. OS X El Capit

Re: Test failure on master?

: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 6:31:23 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Test failure on master? Oh, and it's the OS of my MacBook Pro. > On May 10, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: > > Hi, > > The environment is Mac OS X El Capitan 10.1

Re: Test failure on master?

Oh, and it's the OS of my MacBook Pro. > On May 10, 2016, at 6:59 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: > > Hi, > > The environment is Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11.4. > > Thanks! > Mike > >> On May 10, 2016, at 5:51 AM, Will Stevens wrote: >> >> I think I can verify that this is still happening on mas

Re: Test failure on master?

Hi, The environment is Mac OS X El Capitan 10.11.4. Thanks! Mike > On May 10, 2016, at 5:51 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > I think I can verify that this is still happening on master for him because > you changed the timeout (and the number of tests run, etc) when you pushed > the fix in #1534.

Re: Test failure on master?

I think I can verify that this is still happening on master for him because you changed the timeout (and the number of tests run, etc) when you pushed the fix in #1534. So by looking at the timeout of 6, we can verify that it is the latest code from master being run. I do think we need to rev

Re: Test failure on master?

Mike, Can you comment if you're using latest master. Can you also share the environment where you're running this (in a VM, automated by Jenkins, Java version etc)? Will - I think the issue should be fixed on latest master, but if Mike and others are getting failures I can further relax the te

Re: Test failure on master?

Rohit, can you look into this. It was first introduced in: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493 I thought the problem was fixed with this: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1534 Apparently we still have a problem. This is intermittently emitting false negatives from what I can

RE: Test list

Alive and kicking Kind Regards Giles From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 15 January 2016 14:02 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Test list Hi, Dev list is a bit quite today , just checking everyone is still alive Thanks Glenn [ShapeBlue]

Re: test failure question

I don't see any problem in my env. Anyways, I submitted a pull request to fix this. will push that fix once I get comments, you should be able to use the freshly built marvin in your env with this fix. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/537 ~Talluri On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Daan H

Re: test failure question

Hi Daan, from the output it's exactly the same issue that is causing some of the test suites to not run on some of the travis runs, and that prevented me to fix the fact that tests are considered success when they throw exceptions as we discussed. If you figure it out in the mean while let me know

RE: test discard

5 09:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: test discard Hearing you loud and clear, Rohit. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 January 2015 09:30 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: test discard On We

RE: test discard

Hearing you loud and clear, Rohit. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 07 January 2015 09:30 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: test discard On Wednesday 07 January 2015 02:52 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Ge

Re: test discard

On Wednesday 07 January 2015 02:52 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: Geoff is reporting being blocked when sending to the list testing if I can send emails, from @shapeblue.com account. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhai

Re: Test failure on 4.3 branch

Hi Ian, Thanks for looking into that. From the exception and local testing, I found that the deployment planner failed to find a pool for the system vms for some reason. Anyone know if there was a issue or regression in simulator that got fixed in 4.4/4.5/master as systemvm fails to starts usi

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Pierre, No that is correct. We cannot control the .1 interface which is on the host machine. We can however control .5 and get it to do forwarding On 17 Nov 2014 12:28, "Pierre-Luc Dion" wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I'm trying to run the binary-advanced, in the Public IPs of the zone the > gateway is

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Ian, I'm trying to run the binary-advanced, in the Public IPs of the zone the gateway is 192.168.23.5, should my box have the IP 192.168.23.5 instead of the current 192.168.23.1 ? thanks, On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > So advanced and basic are running

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Pierre, So advanced and basic are running from code on the host machine. Only a NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied. Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and binary-installation-basic. On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Hi Ian, > I'm trying it as it seams quit

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

Hi Ian, I'm trying it as it seams quite strait forward. although, the instruction to install cloudstack [1]: I should run that in the management VM right, not locally ? does IPs are hardcoded somewhere? Thanks, that's awesome to have a local cloudstack running without effort. I'm testing this on

Re: test

sorry for allowing this post, I clicked the accept instead of the reject link. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, 流年似水 wrote: > -- Daan

Re: test day reminder

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/02/2014 09:40 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H all, > > The test day has been a moderate success, I would say. I heard > apologies of people not participating apart from these reactions so > I think we should repeat this effort. Of course we are wor

Re: test day reminder

H all, The test day has been a moderate success, I would say. I heard apologies of people not participating apart from these reactions so I think we should repeat this effort. Of course we are working hard on more forms of continuous integration but these won't suffice before David has 4.5 out the

Re: test day reminder

On 09/30/2014 09:26 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: H all, As you might remember, we agreed on a test day for the master branch on Wednesday the 1st October, during our last meeting in Schihol-Rijk with some folks. Please feel invited to test master so that we can report to our RM for 4.5 for the curre

Re: test day reminder

Instance successfully booted with above noted workaround. Created a ingress security group rule to allow SSH access to the instance. The rule applied as expected and ssh access was allowed. Created an egress security group rule to allow HTTP access out from the instance. The rule applied as expecte

Re: test day reminder

Appear to be able to work around the virtual router issue by modifying the version field in the domain_router table. It will read Cloudstack Release Mon Sep 29 23:17:27 UTC 2014 changing to Cloudstack Release 4.5 Mon Sep 29 23:17:27 UTC 2014 allowed me to boot an instance (note the 4.5 before Mon).

Re: test day reminder

Hi All, Using the following environment: - XenServer 6.2 - The RPM build that was created on October 1st 2015 4:51am http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-master/3361/ - The system vm that was build on September 29th 2015 7:07am http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-mast

Re: test day reminder

I have been looking at using my collegues integration work for the master branch. So far the packaging part is holding my back as it uses 'SNAPSHOT' in the build and does not allow for patch levels (in package.sh) I am looking at a solution. what I am thinking of is making rpms like cloudstack---

Re: test day reminder

I'd be curious to know if it works by re-adding the host. I remember running into situations like this in the past, where the mgmt server was either not fully up or rejecting agents for some reason. On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 09/30/2014 09:26 AM, Daan Hoo

Re: test day reminder

On 09/30/2014 09:26 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H all, > > As you might remember, we agreed on a test day for the master branch on > Wednesday the 1st October, during our last meeting in Schihol-Rijk with > some folks. Please feel invited to test master so that we can report to our > RM for 4.5 f

RE: test case tagging and travis output

if it fails in continuous run, its aconcern to look at. > > Santhosh > > > From: Sebastien Goasguen [run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: test case tag

Re: test case tagging and travis output

guen [run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: test case tagging and travis output > > On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Santhosh Edukulla < > santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > One small note re

RE: test case tagging and travis output

p issue as well, if it fails in continuous run, its aconcern to look at. Santhosh From: Sebastien Goasguen [run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:38 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: test case tagging and travis output On Sep 4

RE: test case tagging and travis output

On 04 September 2014 15:14, Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] wrote: > It seems that CLOUDSTACK-6914 introduced some new tagging scheme for test > and I am assuming the new tagging should exclude the test from the travis > run (makes sense and trying now). The new tagging scheme is not docume

Re: test case tagging and travis output

. > > Regards, > Santhosh > > From: Sebastien Goasguen [run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:19 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Ian Duffy > Subject: Re: test case tagging and travis output > > O

RE: test case tagging and travis output

From: Sebastien Goasguen [run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:19 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Ian Duffy Subject: Re: test case tagging and travis output On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Ian, > > As disc

Re: test case tagging and travis output

On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Ian, > > As discussed off-list I am looking at the failure of extractIso in the fwiw, I removed that test from 4.3 testing. all test seem to pass for 4.3 but Travis still outputs "red" because of some strange return values by Marvin but

Re: Test VM life Cycle

Thanks for looking into it, You did not have to revert the commit, I was just pointing out that it did not seem to have fixed the issue, and that it would be good to get in the habit of testing in our own forks before committing to master. -sebastien On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Sailaja Mada w

RE: Test VM life Cycle

Hi, I have reverted the commit. I will recheck locally and commit the fix. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 September 2014 12:53 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sailaja Mada Subject: Test VM life Cycle Hi Sailaja, Looks

Re: Test Failures

Priyanka, I just ran this on a windows machine in cygwin with latest master. It passed the server package without problems. I am afraid you are on your own at this point unless you can give more data. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > on the latest master? > > I run on a m

Re: Test Failures

on the latest master? I run on a mac and it passes. I'll give it a try on windows later. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using > Cygwin terminal in Windows7 > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daan H

Re: Test Failures

Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using Cygwin terminal in Windows7 On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to > query the stack for the origin of the error. To determine whether i

Re: Test Failures

You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to query the stack for the origin of the error. To determine whether it is an error in the test or in the tested code you would need to have your version of the checked out code. Did you run it repeatedly and bumped into the same e

Re: Test Failures

ya I got the file and xml document also. The content in the file is --- Test set: com.cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResourceTest --

Re: Test Failures

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > C:\cygwin64\home\priya\cloudstack-oss\cloudstack\core\target\surefire-reports in this directory you should find files with stacktraces for the following: Failed tests: testFirewallRulesCommand(com. cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.Vir

Re: Test Failures

This is the snapshot of errors --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResourceTest log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework

Re: Test Failures

Priyanka, what branch? Did you look into the surfire-reports to find out what the test failures are? On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Priyanka Deepala wrote: > After running mvn install -P developer,systemvm > Error:Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:tes

Re: test

No, backlog is to big :) On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > and did it succeed? > > On 8 mei 2014, at 21:08, Nux! wrote: > >> test >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro > -- Daan

Re: test

and did it succeed? On 8 mei 2014, at 21:08, Nux! wrote: > test > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro

RE: Test Issues & Eclipse Errors

All, I've been reading this SO post that seems to shed some light on the issue[0]. If this is the along the right lines, what is the best resolution to the issue? [0] : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8706017/maven-dependency-plugin-goals-copy-dependencies-unpack-is-not-supported-b Regard

Re: test failures

>> > Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" > mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> > Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:34 PM > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" > mailto:

Re: test failures

o:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:34 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: test failures Hi, I wrote those tests a few weeks ago, it

Re: test failures

Hi, I wrote those tests a few weeks ago, it may be my mistake. It works for me after git rebase. Could you send me a full log from the build + testcase output txt/xml file? Thank you, Laszlo On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Min Chen wrote: > I am encountering the same. > > Thanks > -min > > On

Re: test failures

I am encountering the same. Thanks -min On 12/3/13 4:41 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Does anybody experience this test failure on the latest master? > >Results : > >Tests in error: > getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest) > getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize

Re: Test plan for portable ip functionality

Gaurav, Test execution results are updated in a different location for all the features. The one which you are referring here is TestPlan section. Yes you are right that I didn't update all tests with steps. I will be adding all the details soon. Thanks, SWAMY From: Gaurav Aradhye mailto:gau

Re: TEST or integration test?

st mock the db layer. > > To me it would make sense if we use an in memory db like derby for the unit > tests. > > --Alex > > > -Original Message- > > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM >

RE: TEST or integration test?

nit tests. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: TEST or integration test? > > For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are Te

Re: TEST or integration test?

For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are TestNG test cases, requiring DB existence. Thanks -min On 8/6/13 2:59 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage >of maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Prasanna, this category is already added in log4j-cloud.xml.in. Thanks for taking care of this. -min Sent from my iPhone On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: >> Hi Prasanna, >> >>Can you add the following logg

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:04:49PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > Hello Prasanna, > > > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > > test from smoke. But while > > going through various i

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 06:07:24PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > For the following two test failures: > > - > integration.smoke.test_affinity_groups.TestDeployVmWithAffinityGroup.test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup > >It looks to be some issue with

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:33:39PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote: > Hello Prasanna, > > While adding rest of the affinity rules tests I had removed affinity rules > test from smoke. But while > going through various iterations on the review board this hunk to remove test > from smoke was dropped

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

as they may not indicate true failures. > > Prachi > > > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:50 PM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559 > > Here's the latest r

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:11:26PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: > > Hi Prasanna, > > > > Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j > > configuration in your automation run: > > > > > > > > > Should w

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:50:58PM +, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Prasanna, > > Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j > configuration in your automation run: > > > > Should we start including this in the default categories on the cloudstack installations fro

RE: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

disperse the VMs . So we may want to remove the userdispering and userconscentrated planner tests as they may not indicate true failures. Prachi -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:50 PM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: Re: Test

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Hi Prasanna, Can you add the following logging configuration in your log4j configuration in your automation run: I am trying to look into create_template test case failure, but the ms log does not show much information for me to get some clue where it happens wrong.

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #559

Here's the latest run, there are only 7 failures left to have a fully successful run. Test Run: #561 Total:94 Fail :7 Skip :2 name passfailskip test_vm_life_cycle/ 10 0 0 test_glo

Re: Test case execution issue: connect to remote db

Regards, Gaurav | +919028496765 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:26:31PM +0530, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am using a management server and hence db server on remote host which > is > > not local. > > While running test cas

Re: Test case execution issue: connect to remote db

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:26:31PM +0530, Gaurav Aradhye wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using a management server and hence db server on remote host which is > not local. > While running test cases, Whenever I try to get the dbclient, it throws > error " Access denied for user 'username@ip' (using pass

Re: Test halting build every now and then

We should start a bounty on this one. @ke4qqq/@chipc - want to reward the fix at #CCC13? :) On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:57:28PM -0400, Shane Witbeck wrote: > I actually opened an issue for this: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2863 > > I've seen the failure using both wir

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #469

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 07:06:04PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > This is the sample output for the detail requested by Sudha to > automated tests running on jenkins. The email is automated, but > generated on my laptop and I choose to send it. > > If there's further fields to be tweaked, feel

RE: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #469

Thanks Prasanna, This would help to check daily if we are making progress or not on getting the failed TC fixed. Requesting community to see the failed TCs and help to fix product issues. Automation tag has been used for defects logged for the failures. As suggested in IRC Meeting, we can sto

Re: Test Result for test-smoke-matrix #469

This is the sample output for the detail requested by Sudha to automated tests running on jenkins. The email is automated, but generated on my laptop and I choose to send it. If there's further fields to be tweaked, feel free to contribute/request them @ https://github.com/vogxn/jenkins2email On

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I actually opened an issue for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2863 I've seen the failure using both wireless and ether on Mac OS X (10.8.4) from Terminal. Thanks, Shane On Friday, June 14, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > localhost

Re: Test halting build every now and then

not halting. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Sheng Yang > >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Eclipse didn't complain for me. > >> >

Re: Test halting build every now and then

, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Sheng Yang >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Eclipse didn't complain for me. >> >> > > >> >> > > BTW: I am using Linux as development environment. >> >> > > >> >> > > --Sheng >

Re: Test halting build every now and then

n for me. > >> > > > >> > > BTW: I am using Linux as development environment. > >> > > > >> > > --Sheng > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daan Hoogland < > >> > > dhoog

Re: Test halting build every now and then

t;> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daan Hoogland < >> > > dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com >> > > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Macosx? >> > > > Eclipse? >> > > > >&g

RE: Test halting build every now and then

race condition you mentioned seems likely. When irritated by the issue again, I'll try to gather more info. Thanks, Daan Hoogland -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 23:39 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Test halting build every now and then

Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daan Hoogland < > > > dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Macosx? > > > > Eclipse? > > > > > > > > I will try on windows sometime soon (with wireless). > > > > > > > > ---

Re: Test halting build every now and then

gt; > > Macosx? > > > Eclipse? > > > > > > I will try on windows sometime soon (with wireless). > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > > > Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 22:37 > > > To:

Re: Test halting build every now and then

t; > -Original Message- > > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > > Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 22:37 > > To: > > Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then > > > > I tried to look into this, but it's really hard for me to reproduce > i

Re: Test halting build every now and then

rom: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 22:37 > To: > Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then > > I tried to look into this, but it's really hard for me to reproduce it(I've > run the case for 50 times and no show of the issue). > >

RE: Test halting build every now and then

Macosx? Eclipse? I will try on windows sometime soon (with wireless). -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 22:37 To: Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then I tried to look into this, but it's really hard for

Re: Test halting build every now and then

; list, stating a wireless interface on your machine might be the problem. > I > > haven't been able to pinpoint the culprit yet. What is your setup? > > > > Regards, > > Daan Hoogland > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto

Re: Test halting build every now and then

-Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 1:19 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then > > Took five tries to get the build over this hump a moment ago. > > Any thou

RE: Test halting build every now and then

owski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 1:19 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then Took five tries to get the build over this hump a moment ago. Any thoughts on what's going on there? Thanks! On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 a

Re: Test halting build every now and then

Took five tries to get the build over this hump a moment ago. Any thoughts on what's going on there? Thanks! On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if there is a way to stop the build from (very often) > halting here in