On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:25 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> > I'm up for it, delivering from an official ASF source gives it a sense of
> > more authenticity (IMHO).
> >
> > Could we host the RPM/DEB repos there as well?
> >
>
> Yes, that's the easy
should we start using packages.apache.org with 4.6, has 4.5 doc point to
apt-get.eu ?
Our URL would be something like this packages.apache.org/cloudstack ?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:25 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> > I'm up for it, delivering
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> I'm up for it, delivering from an official ASF source gives it a sense of
> more authenticity (IMHO).
>
> Could we host the RPM/DEB repos there as well?
>
Yes, that's the easy part. We could turn that on immediately, if we
are willing to package
I'm up for it, delivering from an official ASF source gives it a sense of
more authenticity (IMHO).
Could we host the RPM/DEB repos there as well?
If we some how could come up with a way for the packaging to provide some
sort of proof of what commit it is built from, it would be easier for users
> On 29-May-2015, at 1:19 am, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
> Yes, for the doc on building systemvm template, should we have a jira for
> this?, but pull request is best ;-), the best doc I've found so far about
> this is this blog post: http://bhaisaab.org/logs/building-systemvms/
https://github.com
Not too many years ago, the system VM was distributed from
cloud.com/Citrix, and we didn't like that (including me). I didn't
like it because it put the community at large in a place where we
relied on Citrix to build and distribute. We now have the ability to
build those systemVMs and I'd prefer w
I feel this could be a potential source of problems.
I haven't checked, as our CloudPlatform is running 4.3.x, but if they base
the cloud.com uploads on the CloudPlatform release, it might not refer to
the proper CloudStack version.
For instance, CloudPlatform 4.5.0 was released long before Cloud
Hi Pierre,
yes Im aware of that mifration, but we tried to deploy zone from
scratch...anyway, with hacking the DB, it was fine later, but we postoned
S3 testing for some later stage, and will use probably the migration path
as you suggested.
Thx !
On 29 May 2015 at 01:39, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
Andrija,
Can you redeploy using the 4.5.1 systemvm template and an NFS as secondary
Storage, then use this API:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/updateCloudToUseObjectStore.html
to migrate from NFS to S3 ? Did try that once and had success, you can
refer to "60 Recipes for
". there is reference
to cloud.com repos as well, and this is into the database of CloudStack."
BTW, systemVM 4.5.1 on cloud.com is broken, cat /etc/*release gives version
4.4, and VR fails to start...(we used S3 Secondary Store for testing, so
could not download from apt or shapeblue...
On 29
Hi,
I'm pretty aligned with Rajani concerns, which is why I've always used
apt-get.eu as repo in the docs. Also, recent RCs I've participate, testers
were using systemvm-template from jenkins so systemvm-templates that end up
on apt-get.eu repo are tested one copied from Jenkins. there is referenc
Hello Rohit,
I've tried your process, but my debian7/CS4.51 doesn't work well.
(I have changed in the database, table vm_template, the type USER to
SYSTEM for the sharpeblue systemvm and SYSTEM to USER for the old systemvm)
The Console proxy starts well, but the SSVM started only after 3 manu
e can build templates from the
> source commit a particular release is voted against.
>
> -Koushik
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 May 2015 1:00
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: R
: Thursday, 28 May 2015 1:00
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: SystemVM (kvm) : 3 different versions for the same CloudStack
version (4.5.1)
Rohit, please take Rajani's points seriously. As companies we try to add value
for our customers. As apache committers we are committed to provide
Rohit, please take Rajani's points seriously. As companies we try to add
value for our customers. As apache committers we are committed to provide
users with a base of quality software that is guaranteed by the foundation.
We can mention our respective companies of course but the releases we make,
Hi Milamber,
You can try this:
Upgrade your current host with latest packages libvirt/qemu and kernel. My test
host was on Ubuntu 14.04.2, so your issue could be something due to Debian 7.x
which ships with much older packages compared to my test host, I’ll try to test
with a Debian 7 host lat
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
> > On 26-May-2015, at 6:27 am, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> >
> > I dont think we should mention shapeblue.com/cloud.com templates in the
> > docs. They may not really be from the point where RC is voted. I think it
> > should be the apt-get.eu
dyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 5:28 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SystemVM (kvm) : 3 different versions for the same CloudStack
> version (4.5.1
> On 26-May-2015, at 6:27 am, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
>
> I dont think we should mention shapeblue.com/cloud.com templates in the
> docs. They may not really be from the point where RC is voted. I think it
> should be the apt-get.eu / jenkins.
I’m not sure why this is relevant to the specific iss
5:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: SystemVM (kvm) : 3 different versions for the same CloudStack
version (4.5.1)
I dont think we should mention shapeblue.com/cloud.com templates in the docs.
They may not really be from the point where RC is voted. I think it should be
the apt-get.eu / jenkins.
I dont think we should mention shapeblue.com/cloud.com templates in the
docs. They may not really be from the point where RC is voted. I think it
should be the apt-get.eu / jenkins.
~Rajani
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Milamber,
>
> In theory you should be able to us
On 25/05/2015 11:56, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Milamber,
In theory you should be able to use any of the systemvmtemplates and also from
jenkins.buildacloud.org, but the one I published on packages.shapeblue.com is
the latest and has the few additional improvements, latest packages and
security
Hi Milamber,
In theory you should be able to use any of the systemvmtemplates and also from
jenkins.buildacloud.org, but the one I published on packages.shapeblue.com is
the latest and has the few additional improvements, latest packages and
security updates.
I’ve tested this and it seems to h
23 matches
Mail list logo
