Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread David Nalley
Sysadmins generally enjoy a single source of truth about what packages are installed on a machine. Telling folks to use gem, pypi and rpm/yum leads to many, occasionally conflicting, reports of what is actually installed on a machine. Hence the suggestion for OS-native packages. On Fri, May 1, 201

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread sebgoa
On May 1, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Jeff Moody wrote: > Rohit, > > I understand and have no issues with this, however, I can forsee parts > of our support organization wanting a binary package (from Citrix) > when this change hits. > > I was just adding my $0.02 to the discussion of "does anyone use t

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread Jeff Moody
Rohit, I understand and have no issues with this, however, I can forsee parts of our support organization wanting a binary package (from Citrix) when this change hits. I was just adding my $0.02 to the discussion of "does anyone use the AWS API" and expressing that my employer has little to no co

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Jeff, Thanks for sharing. ec2stack is available from pypi, so while we can build debs/rpms it can be easily installed using “pip install ec2stack”. The only migration path required by your users would be to change the consumer URL and re-register apikey/secretkey. > On 01-May-2015, at 3:11

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread Jeff Moody
As this change will likely affect Citrix CloudPlatform, I can say that at Datapipe we offer the AWS API endpoint to customers because we had a request for it in the past. It was used once by a customer who then changed to using the native CloudStack API. When this change hits a release of Citrix C

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread sebgoa
On May 1, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > OK, I do not want to push a formal point, just warning. > understood. let's see if other folks are worried about ec2interface upgrade/change. > Op vr 1 mei 2015 om 09:57 schreef Wido den Hollander : > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread Daan Hoogland
OK, I do not want to push a formal point, just warning. Op vr 1 mei 2015 om 09:57 schreef Wido den Hollander : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 01-05-15 09:17, sebgoa wrote: > > > > On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Rohit Yadav > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>> On 30-Apr

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread Wido den Hollander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01-05-15 09:17, sebgoa wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> On 30-Apr-2015, at 7:43 pm, Daan Hoogland >>> wrote: >>> >>> We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually >>> using it. >

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-05-01 Thread sebgoa
On Apr 30, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi, > >> On 30-Apr-2015, at 7:43 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> >> We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually using it. > > The migration path would be documenting the change as part of the release > notes to simply switch

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-04-30 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi, > On 30-Apr-2015, at 7:43 pm, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually using it. The migration path would be documenting the change as part of the release notes to simply switch from using the consumer URL server_ip:7080/awsapi to setting up

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-04-30 Thread Daan Hoogland
We will have to provide a migration path if anybody is actually using it. Biligual auto correct use. Read at your own risico On 30 Apr 2015 19:36, "David Nalley" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just d

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-04-30 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just did not work for me, after > few hours I gave up and used ec2stack which worked out of the box and > certainly felt more friendly to work with. I remembered we discussed removing >

Re: RFC: Removing 1M lines of junk

2015-04-30 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
-Sebastien > On 30 Apr 2015, at 19:23, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was testing awsapi with 4.5 today and it just did not work for me, after > few hours I gave up and used ec2stack which worked out of the box and > certainly felt more friendly to work with. I remembered we discussed