LGTM,
+1
>
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Jul 4, 2016, at 7:57 AM, John Burwell wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Following up on a our discussions about LTS [1], post 4.9 releases [2], and
> 5.0.0/6.0.0 [3], I have as
Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
From: John Burwell
Sent: 06 July 2016 00:46:09
To: Wido den Hollander
Cc: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calendar
Wido,
I don’t think that Rohit is advocating expanding the 4.9.0 scope. Instead
t 4.9.0 out of the door and have LTS based on 4.9.0 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> If Will is not able to find time to work on 4.9 release, maybe someone
> >> else can takeover and help with the 4.9 release by 15th July (at least get
> >> some RCs up for te
not able to find time to work on 4.9 release, maybe someone else
>> can takeover and help with the 4.9 release by 15th July (at least get some
>> RCs up for testing and voting)? LTS can be 4.9.1 etc.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> ____________
ast get some
> RCs up for testing and voting)? LTS can be 4.9.1 etc.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Wido den Hollander
> Sent: 04 July 2016 15:32:45
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 20
release by 15th July (at least get some RCs up
for testing and voting)? LTS can be 4.9.1 etc.
Regards.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 04 July 2016 15:32:45
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2016-2017 Release Cycle and Calenda
> Op 4 juli 2016 om 6:57 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> All,
>
> Following up on a our discussions about LTS [1], post 4.9 releases [2], and
> 5.0.0/6.0.0 [3], I have assembled a release plan for the next 18-20 months in
> the wiki [4]. My original proposal assumed by that 4.9 would be release
