January 2018 16:12:28
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your
integration
(not voting, but) +1 to the general idea of API versioning as a separate
initiative.
- Rohit
<https://cloudstack.apache.
ct: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your
integration
Hi
On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> We've come across a pull request which changes the event description to
> use/export UUIDs instead of the numeric internal ID of a re
day, December 29, 2017 2:28:52 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your
integration
Hi Rohit,
This will break billing for us. We use Ubersmith.
If this change is made, please make it optional (global
+1 for this change as far as I am concerned, seems a good one.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: "dev" , "users"
> Sent: Thursday, 28 December, 2017 09:52:37
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Changing events to in
+1 on API versioning and make it really RESTful (cherry on top).
I'm willing to participate on this change if voted for.
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >
> > We've come across a p
Hi
On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> We've come across a pull request which changes the event description to
> use/export UUIDs instead of the numeric internal ID of a resource. I'm not
> sure if this could potentially break any external integration such as
> billing, cr
