Hi all,
We need to go with api versioning at some point. However, it may not be right to park this till we get api versioning done. Even if we add a global configuration, at some point the dependent apps need to work with uuids and its again some more work is needed on this. Instead let the dependent apps (if there are not too many) plan to work with uuid before 4.12 (may be they can continue using the id based on type of data) and we can give the heads up about the same in the documentation of 4.11. Thanks, Subhash ________________________________ From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> Sent: 01 January 2018 16:12:28 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your integration (not voting, but) +1 to the general idea of API versioning as a separate initiative. - Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> [https://cloudstack.apache.org/images/monkey-144.png]<https://cloudstack.apache.org/> Apache CloudStack: Open Source Cloud Computing<https://cloudstack.apache.org/> cloudstack.apache.org CloudStack is open source cloud computing software for creating, managing, and deploying infrastructure cloud services ________________________________ From: Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:37:18 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your integration Hi On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > We've come across a pull request which changes the event description to > use/export UUIDs instead of the numeric internal ID of a resource. I'm not > sure if this could potentially break any external integration such as > billing, crms etc. so wanted to get your feedback on this. My understanding > is external billing/intergrations would consume from the usage related tables > for data than events table. > > > The PR is https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940 > > > Comments, thoughts? Thanks. Even though I am +1 with this change, we should work towards versioning the API to prevent breaking anything out there. René rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> [http://www.shapeblue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png]<http://www.shapeblue.com/> Shapeblue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/> www.shapeblue.com Rapid deployment framework for Apache CloudStack IaaS Clouds. CSForge is a framework developed by ShapeBlue to deliver the rapid deployment of a standardised ... 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue DISCLAIMER ========== This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
