(not voting, but) +1 to the general idea of API versioning as a separate initiative.
- Rohit <https://cloudstack.apache.org> ________________________________ From: Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:37:18 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your integration Hi On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > > We've come across a pull request which changes the event description to > use/export UUIDs instead of the numeric internal ID of a resource. I'm not > sure if this could potentially break any external integration such as > billing, crms etc. so wanted to get your feedback on this. My understanding > is external billing/intergrations would consume from the usage related tables > for data than events table. > > > The PR is https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940 > > > Comments, thoughts? Thanks. Even though I am +1 with this change, we should work towards versioning the API to prevent breaking anything out there. René rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
