Hey hey,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:50 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley wrote:
>>> Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
>>> 50 commit emails, when it stopped
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 11:50 pm, David Nalley wrote:
> Yes, GH PR is exactly like the Review Board emails in this particular
> aspect. My question is why is this merged into master rather than a
> feature branch, and why no [MERGE] email as per:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley wrote:
>> Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
>> 50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, )
>> We have passed feature freeze for 4.5.0, so I am confused
Hi David,
On 23-Sep-2014, at 8:31 pm, David Nalley wrote:
> Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
> 50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, )
> We have passed feature freeze for 4.5.0, so I am confused as why this
> was merged. Is there a reason not to revert al
Hey David,
This is one of the requests that came in using the “new" github pull request
thing. The big advantage is that we leverage the nice things from github. Part
of doing it that way means we keep the history of the original developer
intact. With review board we typically get one smashed
Where was the merge request for this huge merge to master? (it was at
50 commit emails, when it stopped sending, )
We have passed feature freeze for 4.5.0, so I am confused as why this
was merged. Is there a reason not to revert all of this?
--David
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, wrote:
> Rep
