I think this is only on jenkins.b.o, I’m able to build it locally.
> On 14-Jan-2015, at 8:20 pm, sebgoa wrote:
>
> is there a temporary build issue with 4.3:
>
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> Downloading:
> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.3.2/cloudstack
Perfect - thanks!
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Due to disk space issues, the old job was removed. The new one I added
> never worked.
> Nevertheless, for 4.3.2 no new systemvms are necessary so we can use the
> ones from 4.3.1;
>
> http://packages.shapeblue
Hi Mike,
Due to disk space issues, the old job was removed. The new one I added never
worked.
Nevertheless, for 4.3.2 no new systemvms are necessary so we can use the ones
from 4.3.1;
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.3/4.3.1/
> On 17-Dec-2014, at 6:57 pm, Mike Tutkowski
> wro
Thanks Rohit, I'll build something from the 4.4 branch tomorrow.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2014 10:28:07 PM
&g
Hi Lucian,
On 19-Aug-2014, at 11:06 pm, Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hitting some issues with 4.3 and I'm hopeful I'll get luckier with 4.4. I
> know it suffers from some bugs here and there so my question is, should I
> decide to upgrade today, should I go for 4.4 proper or some git branch?
You
Ian,
It works in 4.3 as well. I would recommend to use 4.4-forward , which contains
good fixes for both simulator and other framework to deploy and run.
We kept a wiki for 4.4-forward branch with all information on how to run and
use simulator, deploy and test.
https://cwiki.apache.org/conflu
Hollander (w...@widodh.nl); Hugo Trippaers
>> > Subject: RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
>> >
>> > May be this can be a quick hackathon in collab. Copying Wido and Hugo
>> >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Ab
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl); Hugo Trippaers
> > Subject: RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
&g
In 4.3 :
For CPVM : Set consoleproxy.url.domain to empty
For SSVM : Set secstorage.encrypt.copy to false
If its an upgrade from 4.3 RC itself, the value for
secstorage.ssl.cert.domain should have been null.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 3:52 PM, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 14.04.2014 20:51, Amogh Vasekar wr
On 14.04.2014 20:51, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Hi,
Is it an upgrade or a fresh 4.3 install for the other set-up you
mentioned?
If it is a fresh set-up, those fields should be NULL since we default
everything to HTTP now.
It's an upgrade from some 4.3 RC..
If I wanted to disable SSL altogether, wh
Hi,
Is it an upgrade or a fresh 4.3 install for the other set-up you mentioned?
If it is a fresh set-up, those fields should be NULL since we default
everything to HTTP now.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 11:33 AM, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 14.04.2014 19:08, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
>> Can you change it to "*.d
On 14.04.2014 19:08, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Can you change it to "*.domain.tld" and try?
Thanks,
Amogh
Thanks Amogh, that did the trick!
Do not that I have the same problem with a default installation using
realhostip, it's good to be fixed.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technol
Can you change it to "*.domain.tld" and try?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 10:59 AM, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 14.04.2014 18:57, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
>> Hi,
>> What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
>
>It's "domain.tld".
>
>--
>Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>Nux!
>www.nux.
On 14.04.2014 18:57, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Hi,
What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
It's "domain.tld".
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
On 14.04.2014 16:21, Nux! wrote:
Hello,
I run my own "realhostip" and today by chance I needed to download a
template from ACS 4.3, but instead of getting a link looking like
http://1-2-3-4.mydomain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 I got with just the top
domain: http://domain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 which end u
Hi,
What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 8:21 AM, "Nux!" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I run my own "realhostip" and today by chance I needed to download a
>template from ACS 4.3, but instead of getting a link looking like
>http://1-2-3-4.mydomain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 I
; -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl); Hugo Trippaers
> Subject: RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
[mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl); Hugo Trippaers
Subject: RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
May be this can be a quick hackathon in collab. Copying Wido and Hugo
May be this can be a quick hackathon in collab. Copying Wido and Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:18 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.3 system vm template
On 10/04/14 5:24 pm, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
>> "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical²,
>> The pop up does not go away breaking the build job.
>>
>> Guys, find the solution !
>>
>> -abhi
>
>
>This sort
On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
"DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical²,
The pop up does not go away breaking the build job.
Guys, find the solution !
-abhi
This sort of works for me:
(I'm downgrading to the vulnerable versio
On 10/04/14 4:23 pm, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
>> "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical²,
>> The pop up does not go away breaking the build job.
>>
>> Guys, find the solution !
>>
>
>We may need to use a
On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
"DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical²,
The pop up does not go away breaking the build job.
Guys, find the solution !
We may need to use a preseed file then. Not sure how easy this is or
how we
I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
"DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical²,
The pop up does not go away breaking the build job.
Guys, find the solution !
-abhi
On 10/04/14 3:32 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek"
wrote:
>
>
>On 10/04/14 3:04 pm, "Nux!" wrote:
>
>>On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abh
On 10/04/14 3:04 pm, "Nux!" wrote:
>On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>>> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog
>>> logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase
>>> iptables
>>> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-ye
On 10.04.2014 10:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog
logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase
iptables
apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install
openssh-server openssl e2fsprogs dhcp3-clien
> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog
> logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase
> iptables
> apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install
> openssh-server openssl e2fsprogs dhcp3-client tcpdump socat wget
>
>
> -Harikrishn
On 10.04.2014 08:31, Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
On 4.3 this env var is already there.
install_packages() {
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical
# Basic packages
apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog
logrotate cron chkconfig insserv net-tool
On 4.3 this env var is already there.
install_packages() {
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical
# Basic packages
apt-get --no-install-recommends -q -y --force-yes install rsyslog logrotate
cron chkconfig insserv net-tools ifupdown vim-tiny netbase iptables
apt-get --
On 09.04.2014 21:44, Rayees Namathponnan wrote:
Hi All,
4.3 system vm template job failing; looks like build falling after
the getting updated openssl 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/140/console
Rajesh
Would this affect VMware vSphere servers as well or just Xen?
Thanks
ilya
On 2/24/14, 10:15 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote:
This commit will resolve the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6159
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:
On 24.03.2014 22:26, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
Possibly as recent work has been done on the SG iptables bits to fix
some serious issues, some others may have been introduced.
Here's the default output of iptables-save in a KVM agent:
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/88208/39569972/
The critical line is: "-
nt: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:20 PM
To:
dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
John,
I could not reproduce this broken build on 4.3 after wiping out my entire
repository.
1. rm -rf ~/.m2/repository
2.
n get a fix right away
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:20 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
>
> John,
>
> I c
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:45 AM
> To: dev; Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: [4.3][CLOUDSTACK-6232]isolated network can no longer reserve ip
> range
>
> Animesh, I really feel for you in your role as relea
al Message-
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:26 AM
>> To: dev
>> Subject: Re: [4.3] CLOUDSTACK cidr list length
>>
>> H Animesh,
>>
>> tyhe other one is for 6232 and I cherrypicked it wit
6 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [4.3] CLOUDSTACK cidr list length
>
> H Animesh,
>
> tyhe other one is for 6232 and I cherrypicked it without recompile, hence the
> tabs to spaces commit.
>
> I am still in discussion with Alena about it. She thinks it is incomplete. It
&
H Animesh,
tyhe other one is for 6232 and I cherrypicked it without recompile,
hence the tabs to spaces commit.
I am still in discussion with Alena about it. She thinks it is
incomplete. It is functional for us, but she might be right anyway.
I don't think it will compile with the trivial one bu
I see your this commit + one another f78e7ae51f55da17ed5ba239f99457ee8bc7c4d8
for CLOUDSTACK-6232
That is it right so two commits.
There is one more I just saw that is mostly checkstyle fixes
0379dbb489b2502b8cf89583afd1a1f3baec93a3 which is trivial
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Kinsella
Done
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 2:08 PM
> To:
> Subject: [4.3][Cherry-pick] realhostip changes
>
> Animesh - please pick the commit below from 4.3-forward into 4.3. This is for
> CLOUDSTACK-6204.
>
> 2fe7aeea23dde
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 8:41 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>
> I have a review request sitting at https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/ - that
> works for me
our next RC.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 4:14 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>>
>> David was seeing this as well. This is is a d
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>
> David was seeing this as well. This is is a documented problem at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAMPART-393.
>
> I just spun up a VM at AWS using a 64 bit amazon linux api. Ran the
> commands below, got
this is an issue or not and if so if we can get a fix right away
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
John,
I could not re
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 4.3 vote
>
> John,
>
> I could not reproduce this broken build on 4.3 after wiping out my entire
> repository.
> 1. rm -rf ~/.m2/repository
> 2. mvn clean install -Pawsapi
>
> My build is successful.
>
> Can someone
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
The dependency's actually been broken for a very long time, apparently. On a
clean box with no maven repository cache (rm -rf ~/.m2/repository), awsapi (and
therefore RPMs) will not build.
It looks like Noa saw similar iss
haturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:07 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] developer mysql dependencies
>
> Done
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > Sent: W
AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
FYI I'm still -1 until CLOUDSTACK-6156 and
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18392/ is addressed.
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> wrote:
John when was the dependency broken? Are you not able to build AWSAPI?
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:00 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>
> FYI I'm still -1
2014 7:58 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>>
>>
>> On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Nux! wrote:
>>
>>> On 05.03.2014 15:52, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>> Working on it now, waiting on 1 last thing for realhostip changes
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.3 vote
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
> > On 05.03.2014 15:52, Animesh Chaturv
On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 05.03.2014 15:52, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> Working on it now, waiting on 1 last thing for realhostip changes
>
> So, does the realhostip "feature" disappear starting with 4.3?
if that's the case we need to put this on the release notes. Happy to
On 05.03.2014 15:52, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Working on it now, waiting on 1 last thing for realhostip changes
So, does the realhostip "feature" disappear starting with 4.3?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Working on it now, waiting on 1 last thing for realhostip changes
From: Giles Sirett [mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.3 vote
I've lost track a little of the 4.3 vote.
Last I saw was that 6th round had been cancel
Done
From: Murali Reddy
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:53 AM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [4.3][Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6162:support OVS as connectivity service
provider
Can you please cherry-pick below commits
BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-6162: UI > zone > physical netw
Done
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:29 PM
> To:
> Subject: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] developer mysql dependencies
>
> Dearest RM - would like the following commits from 4.3-forward picked into
> 4.3.
>
> To the best
Done
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 2:45 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6186
>
> Hi Animesh - Can you please cherry pick the following commit from 4.3-
> forward to 4.3?
>
>
Done
> -Original Message-
> From: Min Chen
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:25 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: Re: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6174, CLOUDSTACK-6175
>
> Animesh,
>
> Can you cherry pick
Done
> -Original Message-
> From: Likitha Shetty
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:39 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Subject: [4.3] [Cherry-pick] CLOUDSTACK-6146
>
> Animesh,
>
> Can you cherry pick 8cb03ddb2387c7aebf20dc0aa011e41f227e9f68 and
> c652f
H Qian,
Submit a bug report in jira [1].
If you have a fix for the 'master' branch submit a review request in
the review board [2] be sure to add enough contents to the fields and
set the group to 'cloudstack'. Find the people most involved with the
code you changed and ask them to review.
If you
On 03.03.2014 17:18, Marcus wrote:
What is your overprovisioning set to? The dashboard might be correct,
for example if you have 3.17T and set overprovision to 3 you'll have
9.51T of allocatable space.
Marcus,
That's the thing, I played with overprovisioning, but then set
everything back to 1
What is your overprovisioning set to? The dashboard might be correct,
for example if you have 3.17T and set overprovision to 3 you'll have
9.51T of allocatable space.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Nux! wrote:
> On 03.03.2014 08:39, Nux! wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm on 4.3 rev 4440 (latest RC). Af
On 03.03.2014 08:39, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
I'm on 4.3 rev 4440 (latest RC). After playing around with
overprovisioning I'm left out with this in the Dashboard:
9.52 TB of (local) storage instead of 3.17 TB (although the
individual primary storage entry in Infrastructure shows the right
thing)
119.95 G
On 03.03.2014 09:14, Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
Hi,
In case of KVM we read the socket count from the parameter ‘sockets’
in NodeInfo class.
Can you check with the command “virsh nodeinfo” ?
How many cores do you have per cpu ?
Indeed it seems like libvirt issue:
virsh nodeinfo
CPU model:
Hi,
In case of KVM we read the socket count from the parameter ‘sockets’ in
NodeInfo class.
Can you check with the command “virsh nodeinfo” ?
How many cores do you have per cpu ?
Thanks
Harikrishna
On 02-Mar-2014, at 7:50 pm, Nux! wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Which script is responsible for gettin
Animesh,
Can you cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3?
4c83f80c809674cb8ff9561d546a6ade25d983f8
CLOUDSTACK-6174: Provide separate option for Windows Server 2012 R2 as
an OS type when registering template.
94257c0fc85c7178e6ca3146662de08feee2c290
CLOUDSTACK-6175:s3.
This commit will resolve the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6159
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:39 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject:
a bug id associated with it.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:07 AM
>>> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
>>> Cc: dev
>>> Subject: Re: [4.3]
>>>
>>
an.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:07 AM
>> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
>> Cc: dev
>> Subject: Re: [4.3]
>>
>> no, it is for a bug in the nicira base private gateways. unrelated.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Animesh Chaturv
Can you log a separate bug then? At this point all commits to 4.3-forward
should have a bug id associated with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:07 AM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: de
no, it is for a bug in the nicira base private gateways. unrelated.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> What is this fix for? Is this for CLOUDSTACK-6069?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 1
What is this fix for? Is this for CLOUDSTACK-6069?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:25 AM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: dev
> Subject: [4.3]
>
> Animesh,
>
> Can you please cherry-pick 5af163ff7f658c30c6d93
Hiroaki I am waiting on resolution on concern from Alena in other thread
-Original Message-
From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick
Hi,
I found that our plugin was
Pulling in to 4.3 now
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 6:10 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: 4.3 commit cherry pick
Hi Animesh,
Please cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch
Hi Animesh,
Please cherry pick the following commits from 4.3-forward to 4.3 branch.
7255e50f2051aff1cb5e1991e2dde4ef48f57454
888b90677623da745a01db0a5087272f0dabe42c
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 30-Jan-2014, at 2:36 PM, Jayapal Reddy wrote:
> Hi Animesh,
>
> Can you please cherry pick commit to 7255e5
Hi,
I found that our plugin was broken, so please cherry pick
db3dc2ee17c699f1abf42ea2fbe09ec2748caa4a in 4.3-forward.
(2014/01/30 18:06), Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:
> Hi Animesh,
>
> Can you please cherry pick commit to 7255e50f2051aff1cb5e1991e2dde4ef48f57454
> 4.3 branch
> from 4.3-forward
Sure will do
Thanks
Animesh
On Jan 29, 2014, at 6:02 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote:
> Hi Animesh,
>
> Seems we need another RC, so I'd like to include this fix in the new build.
> It's already in 4.3-forward branch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> commit 441d02dd402e632c3eba1062a55fc0d752e76003
> Author: Sheng Yan
Thanks Rayees, great!!!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Rayees Namathponnan
wrote:
> Timeout failures are intermediate, If we re-run these test individually
> test gets pass.
>
> I observed similar issues in previous run also, in my analysis I didn¹t
> see any product failures with this run.
>
>
Timeout failures are intermediate, If we re-run these test individually
test gets pass.
I observed similar issues in previous run also, in my analysis I didn¹t
see any product failures with this run.
Regards,
Rayees
On 1/21/14 7:28 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:43 AM,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Rayees Namathponnan
wrote:
> Total : 444
> Failed : 28
> Skip: 22
>
> Most the failures are due to timeout error
>
> Regards,
Rayees, one litle query. Are those timeout issues intermittend over
runs? Meaning do different tests fail each run? Do you have da
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:39:14PM +0100, sebgoa wrote:
> >>
> >> IMHO we need running integration tests for master, and we need
> >> integration tests for specific releases.
> >>
> >> I would not delete the view, I would just make sure that there are
> >> different test-* jobs for master and for
On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
wrote:
>
>
> On 21/01/14 6:00 pm, "sebgoa" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes sebastiean, they both contain same jobs but in a different view
>>> which is not very useful (I rea
On 21/01/14 6:00 pm, "sebgoa" wrote:
>
>On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
> wrote:
>
>> Yes sebastiean, they both contain same jobs but in a different view
>> which is not very useful (I realised it after I created one). We can
>> remove the view cloudstack-qa-4.3.
>> I¹ll
On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
wrote:
> Yes sebastiean, they both contain same jobs but in a different view
> which is not very useful (I realised it after I created one). We can
> remove the view cloudstack-qa-4.3.
> I¹ll go ahead and remove it.
then we need different
Yes sebastiean, they both contain same jobs but in a different view
which is not very useful (I realised it after I created one). We can
remove the view cloudstack-qa-4.3.
I¹ll go ahead and remove it.
I have fixed all the infra issues that we were facing in test jobs and now
I have scheduled tes
Talluri,
Is there a difference between:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/
and
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-regression-matrix/
they have the same jobid…seems to be the same jobs ?
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Srikan
Rayees, cloudstack-qa jobs are based on master branch, we need to be checking
the results for cloudstack-qa-4.3 that Talluri just setup friday.
-sebastien
On Jan 17, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Rayees Namathponnan
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here 4.3 BVT automation result on Xen,
> http://jenkins.builda
Has gotten it back
f0ad14e23574041ee75eb4e34bdbab69f05c909b
thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 10:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 4.3 : Developer Profil
/message/3ch4lgaq4yjaop7e?q=darren+shepherd+mvn
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Frank Zhang [frank.zh...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 6:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented
Sorry this was by a
Sorry this was by a mistake.
The maven build costs too long so I comment tools out as it's rarely used by
developer build. later on I found there is
a profile called 'impatient' which does exactly the same thing.
before bring it back, I wonder if it's right to put 'tools' in developer
profile? I
This is caused by this commit: 23841e3369877e404e4c7f4000a1ee540d1dcfa8.
I am working on the fix.
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 6:06 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.3 build faili
Re-created the build; build completed successfully.
Not sure, what happened last time; Thanks Min.
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.3 build failing
Rayees, I just built latest 4.3 on my laptop using "mvn clean install
-Psystemvm", it works fine.
Thanks
-min
On 12/10/13 2:31 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>That test I put in about one year ago, since then nothing has been
>changed. Strange why is it suddenly broken. I will try myself to see.
>
>Than
That test I put in about one year ago, since then nothing has been
changed. Strange why is it suddenly broken. I will try myself to see.
Thanks
-min
On 12/10/13 2:21 PM, "Rayees Namathponnan"
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>4.3 build failing, due to test failure in "API Rate Limit"; someone
>please look t
Perfect. Thank you...
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Done, pushed to 4.3 and MASTER branch.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Stevens
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Sheng...
> >
> > Will
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> >
> > >
Done, pushed to 4.3 and MASTER branch.
--Sheng
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thanks Sheng...
>
> Will
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>
> > OK, I would take it.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --Sheng
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Ste
Thanks Sheng...
Will
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> OK, I would take it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules
> in
> > the Palo Alto p
OK, I would take it.
Thanks!
--Sheng
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Hey all,
> There is currently a bug in the implementation of egress firewall rules in
> the Palo Alto plugin.
>
> Here is the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5425
>
> I have attach
Oops, not the same problem. 5408 is out of system memory, different than
the one I mentioned about Min¹s fix which is about JVM heap
Kelven
On 12/9/13, 2:53 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>This issue is caused by trying to solve a mysterious JVM incompatibility
>issue in a wrong trying in commit
>ed0
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
