Sorry for digging up an old thread.

Hit this issue today on trying to build the 32 bit template.

The upgrade of libssl was occurring with apt-get update

To work around this I just added a default value via the pre-seed file.

libssl1.0.0 libssl1.0.0/restart-services boolean true
libssl1.0.0:i386 libssl1.0.0/restart-services boolean true
libssl1.0.0:amd64 libssl1.0.0/restart-services boolean true


On 10 April 2014 22:26, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the proper way to update the systemvm-template? I already have
> systemvm-xenserver-4.3 registered as I've upgraded from 4.2.1, should I
> delete that first or use another name?
>
> --
> Erik Weber
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Rayees Namathponnan <
> rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > This is fixed in commit
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=0965fdb9f8f3cad8629761884eab16b2503cca1a
> >
> > New templates available at
> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rayees
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Wido den Hollander (w...@widodh.nl); Hugo Trippaers
> > Subject: RE: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
> >
> > May be this can be a quick hackathon in collab. Copying Wido and Hugo
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 9:18 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: 4.3 system vm template job failing in jenkins
> > >
> > > On 10/04/14 5:24 pm, "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 10.04.2014 11:17, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> > > >> I have tried with both the options now i.e. -qq and by removing
> > > >> "DEBIAN_PRIORITY=critical², The pop up does not go away breaking
> > > >> the build job.
> > > >>
> > > >> Guys, find the solution !
> > > >>
> > > >> -abhi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >This sort of works for me:
> > > >
> > > >(I'm downgrading to the vulnerable version)
> > > >
> > > >root@v-45-VM:~# aptitude install libssl1.0.0=1.0.1e-2+deb7u4 The
> > > >following packages will be DOWNGRADED:
> > > >   libssl1.0.0
> > > >0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and
> > > >34 not upgraded.
> > > >Need to get 0 B/3,027 kB of archives. After unpacking 52.2 kB will be
> > > >freed.
> > > >Preconfiguring packages ...
> > > >dpkg: warning: downgrading libssl1.0.0:i386 from 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 to
> > > >1.0.1e-2+deb7u4
> > > >(Reading database ... 24354 files and directories currently
> > > >installed.) Preparing to replace libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6
> > > >(using
> > > >.../libssl1.0.0_1.0.1e-2+deb7u4_i386.deb) ...
> > > >Unpacking replacement libssl1.0.0:i386 ...
> > > >Setting up libssl1.0.0:i386 (1.0.1e-2+deb7u4) ...
> > > >
> > > >root@v-45-VM:~# "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y
> > > >-qq --force-yes libssl1.0.0 Preconfiguring packages ...
> > > >(Reading database ... 24354 files and directories currently
> > > >installed.) Preparing to replace libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.1e-2+deb7u4
> > > >(using
> > > >.../libssl1.0.0_1.0.1e-2+deb7u6_i386.deb) ...
> > > >Unpacking replacement libssl1.0.0:i386 ...
> > > >Setting up libssl1.0.0:i386 (1.0.1e-2+deb7u6) ...
> > > >Checking for services that may need to be restarted...done.
> > > >Checking init scripts...
> > > >
> > > >Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade:
> > > >[ ok ] Restarting OpenBSD Secure Shell server: sshd.
> > > >[ ok ] Stopping NTP server: ntpd.
> > > >[ ok ] Starting NTP server: ntpd.
> > > >[ ok ] Stopping daemon monitor: monit.
> > > >[ ok ] Starting daemon monitor: monit.
> > > >
> > > >Services restarted successfully."
> > > >
> > > >I tried disabling the $post script, but apparently there is no way to
> > > >do this in Debian.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is it possible for someone on the thread to test it out. I can get
> > > back to this tomorrow.
> > >
> > > -abhi
> > > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to