Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM

2015-02-10 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
CLOUDSTACK-8239 Has been created Thanks Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Wido den Hollander" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 8:04:16 PM > Subject: Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM

2015-02-10 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Wido, sure will do! Andrei - Original Message - > From: "Wido den Hollander" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 8:04:16 PM > Subject: Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Ha

Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM

2015-02-10 Thread Wido den Hollander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hello guys, > > I was wondering what is the current support for implementing > virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by > googling apart from it has been built into OpenSta

CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM

2015-02-10 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Hello guys, I was wondering what is the current support for implementing virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by googling apart from it has been built into OpenStack already. The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing the number of dev