-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hello guys, > > I was wondering what is the current support for implementing > virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by > googling apart from it has been built into OpenStack already. > > The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be > increasing the number of devices you can attach to a vm, but also, > and that's what I am interested in is the ability to use discard > and reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. > There are also talks about having a greater performance advantage > as well. > Not done yet, but something which crossed my mind. Shouldn't be a real problem to do however, it's just a small XML change in the Agent. Would you mind opening a ticket in Jira? Wido > Thanks > > Andrei > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2mQ+AAoJEAGbWC3bPspCIbAQAKmMyO5sOfMwVBvYsAZ0sBKZ CvjLfI+D59uH28qj80QD/Ti83JBlq1qmbGbPWlVgZkjSyWQMM0NrJ20R4sP8dXGr kbotx25VkfMI0UqwnhplIldMmnI2ELTuLcPRUG8n6zfDDXEjZt9+iyJc94loRg7U srHoCMDEnT+In9AtzDbzWOeZwXLYFTaajzwgDAQtJUn0xNL9v73C3cE0m72DkvPe tHmgWJJ7aWJPseQ9SjZXj5j7GAHkZMhsLaIajVnrMvg+kXUNUnqcRXqdxdxeZIiw J0ak9ztQd3tiLHl4qd4qjRaeROUP2TWzb5rFVATv3Ofd5g3MF0hvR/0+1T7cVD03 Mg5cA9geHBpQvbe5Wy1c67n2zePpRP6coHb4HNIIb0EhlvaM6MzrFEvXvutnK9QF lMAZ5z6apQUnYLUio/G7vp//yd636LUlW9cIVsyqw4TQ41JfiPYwFZvghMAjt2nk 3SNTBkqnPmbpCT+X5dpoSqLPVhtnkg1SO2rwy1+sggvO/EGapjQ2tWqWeAbVQmPd 1n8AYijmexFkk+sQQHGiEeff+Al65/WTeh9y9vFZKtoVyIiUOuK141Jr1LeuoDtN wXhmuyo7otWWZjt9l5+lPFqZLNoAp59stcTLzS5/DnGl+z5n6pgtp/Q6d7o4HMH0 Aj4TGPb16qm1nql6SAsZ =NzP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
